U.S. Supreme Court Precedents on Arbitration: Shaping the American Arbitration Law and Practice: International Litigation in Practice, cartea 14
Editat de Kabir Duggal, Yasmine Lahlou, Carlos Alberto Carmona, Gustavo Favero Vaughnen Limba Engleză Hardback – 19 dec 2024
Preț: 756.37 lei
Preț vechi: 922.40 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 1135
Preț estimativ în valută:
144.74€ • 151.79$ • 120.70£
144.74€ • 151.79$ • 120.70£
Carte nepublicată încă
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789004715813
ISBN-10: 9004715819
Pagini: 458
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria International Litigation in Practice
ISBN-10: 9004715819
Pagini: 458
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria International Litigation in Practice
Notă biografică
Kabir Duggal is an attorney in Arnold and Porter's New York office, a Lecturer-in-Law at Columbia Law School, an adjunct Professor at Fordham Law School, and a Course Director and a Faculty Member for the Columbia Law School-Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Comprehensive Course on International Arbitration.
Yasmine Lahlou, Partner, Chaffetz Lindsey, has over 20 years of experience in international arbitration. Initially trained in Paris and admitted in Paris and New York, she is experienced in civil and common law systems. Yasmine has been counsel in dozens of arbitrations conducted under the ICC, ICDR, LCIA, UNCITRAL and ad hoc rules.
Carlos Alberto Carmona is a Professor of Procedural Law and Arbitration at the University of Sao Paulo, a Partner of Marques Rosado, Toledo Cesar & Carmona Advogados, and former President of the Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual (Brazilian Institute of Procedural Law).
Gustavo Favero Vaughn (LL.M, Columbia Law School) is a Partner at Cesar Asfor Rocha Advogados. He has worked as an International Lawyer at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, teaches at the Brazilian Institute of Capital Markets (Ibmec), in São Paulo, is an Alumni Advisor at the American Review of International Arbitration (ARIA) and Academic Coordinator at Arbitration Channel He has been appointed to serve as an administrative judge of the São Paulo Bar Association’s Ethics and Disciplinary Court.
Yasmine Lahlou, Partner, Chaffetz Lindsey, has over 20 years of experience in international arbitration. Initially trained in Paris and admitted in Paris and New York, she is experienced in civil and common law systems. Yasmine has been counsel in dozens of arbitrations conducted under the ICC, ICDR, LCIA, UNCITRAL and ad hoc rules.
Carlos Alberto Carmona is a Professor of Procedural Law and Arbitration at the University of Sao Paulo, a Partner of Marques Rosado, Toledo Cesar & Carmona Advogados, and former President of the Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual (Brazilian Institute of Procedural Law).
Gustavo Favero Vaughn (LL.M, Columbia Law School) is a Partner at Cesar Asfor Rocha Advogados. He has worked as an International Lawyer at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, teaches at the Brazilian Institute of Capital Markets (Ibmec), in São Paulo, is an Alumni Advisor at the American Review of International Arbitration (ARIA) and Academic Coordinator at Arbitration Channel He has been appointed to serve as an administrative judge of the São Paulo Bar Association’s Ethics and Disciplinary Court.
Cuprins
Notes on Contributors
Editors’ Note
1 Supreme Court Case Law on Arbitration through a Restatement Lens
George A. Bermann
2 The Evolution of Arbitration in Light of Supreme Court Decisions
Peter J. Messitte, Carlos Mário da Silva Velloso, Erico Bomfim de Carvalho and João Carlos Banhos Velloso
3 The Importance of the U.S. Supreme Court in Shaping U.S. Arbitration Law & Practice
Daniel Schimmel, Shrutih Tewarie and James Fullmer
4Prima Paint Corporation v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Company (1967)
R. Doak Bishop and Marcio Vasconcellos
5Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Cas. Co. (1968): The Supreme Court’s Fractured Interpretation of “Evident Partiality” under the Federal Arbitration Act and Its Legacy
Ank Santens, Surya Gopalan and Stephen Hogan-Mitchell
6Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. (1974)
Michael B. Carlinsky and Andre Luis Monteiro
7Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. et al., 473 US. 614 (1985)
Sherman Kahn
8Shearson/Am. Exp., Inc v. Mcmahon (1987)
Steven Skulnik
9 Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (1989)
Peter Fox
10First Options of Chicago, Inc v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995): To Delegate or Not to Delegate, Forty Years On
Kabir Duggal, Yasmine Lahlou, Carlos Alberto Carmona and Gustavo Favero Vaughn
11Vimar Seguros y Reaseguros, s.a. v. m/v Sky Reefer et al. (1995)
Rodrigo Tannuri, Matheus Soubhia Sanches, Felipe Conrado and Rekha Rangachari
12Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S. 52 (1995)
Caline Mouawad and Alex Lupsaiu
13Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002)
Gary L. Benton
14PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Book (2003)
Samaa Haridi and Jessica Beess und Chrostin
15Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle (2003): The Supreme Court’s First Look at Class Action Arbitrability
Andrew Behrman, Yining Bei and Zeinab Bailoun
16Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (2004)
Preeti Bhagnani and Stephen Hogan-Mitchell
17Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., v. Cardegna (2006)
Lea Haber Kuck
18Hall Street Associates, l.l.c. v. Mattel, Inc. (2008): The Scope and Limits of Party Autonomy: Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards
Peter B. Rutledge
19Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009)
Dana MacGrath
20Rent-A-Center West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010)
Zachary Kady and Rahim Moloo
21Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662 (2010): The Impact of the Stolt-Nielsen Decision on Class-Action Arbitration
Andrew Finn and Pedro José Izquierdo
22Granite Rock Co. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters (2010)
Steven Skulnik
23at&t Mobility llc v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011)
Grant Hanessian
24Oxford Health Plans llc v. Sutter (2013)
James Hosking, Gretta Walters and Marcel Engholm
25American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant (2013)
Fabiano Robalinho, Caetano Berenguer and João Lucas Bevilacqua
26bg Group, Plc v. Republic of Argentina, 572 U.S. 25 (2014)
Elliot Friedman and Cameron Russell
27Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019): The Supreme Court Limits Class Arbitration
John Fellas
28New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira, 139 S. Ct. 532 (2019)
Michael A. Fernández
29Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc. (2019): The Henry Schein Dispute—Uncertainty Regarding Arbitral Jurisdiction and the End of the Wholly Groundless Exception
Mark Kantor
30ge Energy Power Conversion France sas Corp v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, llc (2020): Application of U.S. Domestic Arbitration Law to Non-Signatory Enforcement of International Arbitration Agreements, and other Potential Impacts of Domestic Arbitration Doctrines in International Contexts
Ari D. MacKinnon, Jonathan I. Blackman and Katie L. Gonzalez
31zf Automotive, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, llp v. Fund for Protection of Investors’ Rights in Foreign States (2022)
Flávio Luiz Yarshell and Rafael Stefanini Auilo
32Morgan V. Sundance, Inc. (2022)
Liz Snodgrass and Laura França Pereira
33Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022)
Eduardo Damião Gonçalves, Arthur Gonzalez Cronemberger Parente and Laura Lambert da Costa
34Coinbase v. Bielski (2023): Shift from Judicial Discretion to a Mandatory Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of an Interlocutory Appeal from the Denial of a Motion to Compel Arbitration
Boaz S. Morag and Peter E. Carzis
35Cmb Monaco V. Smagin (2023)
Katharine Menéndez de la Cuesta and Rafael Francisco Alves
36Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski et al. (2024): Delegation versus Forum Selection Clause, Contradictory Contracts, and Kompetenz-Kompetenz Doctrine
Peter C. Sester
Index
Editors’ Note
1 Supreme Court Case Law on Arbitration through a Restatement Lens
George A. Bermann
2 The Evolution of Arbitration in Light of Supreme Court Decisions
Peter J. Messitte, Carlos Mário da Silva Velloso, Erico Bomfim de Carvalho and João Carlos Banhos Velloso
3 The Importance of the U.S. Supreme Court in Shaping U.S. Arbitration Law & Practice
Daniel Schimmel, Shrutih Tewarie and James Fullmer
4Prima Paint Corporation v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Company (1967)
R. Doak Bishop and Marcio Vasconcellos
5Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Cas. Co. (1968): The Supreme Court’s Fractured Interpretation of “Evident Partiality” under the Federal Arbitration Act and Its Legacy
Ank Santens, Surya Gopalan and Stephen Hogan-Mitchell
6Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. (1974)
Michael B. Carlinsky and Andre Luis Monteiro
7Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. et al., 473 US. 614 (1985)
Sherman Kahn
8Shearson/Am. Exp., Inc v. Mcmahon (1987)
Steven Skulnik
9 Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (1989)
Peter Fox
10First Options of Chicago, Inc v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995): To Delegate or Not to Delegate, Forty Years On
Kabir Duggal, Yasmine Lahlou, Carlos Alberto Carmona and Gustavo Favero Vaughn
11Vimar Seguros y Reaseguros, s.a. v. m/v Sky Reefer et al. (1995)
Rodrigo Tannuri, Matheus Soubhia Sanches, Felipe Conrado and Rekha Rangachari
12Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S. 52 (1995)
Caline Mouawad and Alex Lupsaiu
13Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002)
Gary L. Benton
14PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Book (2003)
Samaa Haridi and Jessica Beess und Chrostin
15Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle (2003): The Supreme Court’s First Look at Class Action Arbitrability
Andrew Behrman, Yining Bei and Zeinab Bailoun
16Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (2004)
Preeti Bhagnani and Stephen Hogan-Mitchell
17Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., v. Cardegna (2006)
Lea Haber Kuck
18Hall Street Associates, l.l.c. v. Mattel, Inc. (2008): The Scope and Limits of Party Autonomy: Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards
Peter B. Rutledge
19Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009)
Dana MacGrath
20Rent-A-Center West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010)
Zachary Kady and Rahim Moloo
21Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662 (2010): The Impact of the Stolt-Nielsen Decision on Class-Action Arbitration
Andrew Finn and Pedro José Izquierdo
22Granite Rock Co. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters (2010)
Steven Skulnik
23at&t Mobility llc v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011)
Grant Hanessian
24Oxford Health Plans llc v. Sutter (2013)
James Hosking, Gretta Walters and Marcel Engholm
25American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant (2013)
Fabiano Robalinho, Caetano Berenguer and João Lucas Bevilacqua
26bg Group, Plc v. Republic of Argentina, 572 U.S. 25 (2014)
Elliot Friedman and Cameron Russell
27Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019): The Supreme Court Limits Class Arbitration
John Fellas
28New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira, 139 S. Ct. 532 (2019)
Michael A. Fernández
29Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc. (2019): The Henry Schein Dispute—Uncertainty Regarding Arbitral Jurisdiction and the End of the Wholly Groundless Exception
Mark Kantor
30ge Energy Power Conversion France sas Corp v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, llc (2020): Application of U.S. Domestic Arbitration Law to Non-Signatory Enforcement of International Arbitration Agreements, and other Potential Impacts of Domestic Arbitration Doctrines in International Contexts
Ari D. MacKinnon, Jonathan I. Blackman and Katie L. Gonzalez
31zf Automotive, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, llp v. Fund for Protection of Investors’ Rights in Foreign States (2022)
Flávio Luiz Yarshell and Rafael Stefanini Auilo
32Morgan V. Sundance, Inc. (2022)
Liz Snodgrass and Laura França Pereira
33Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022)
Eduardo Damião Gonçalves, Arthur Gonzalez Cronemberger Parente and Laura Lambert da Costa
34Coinbase v. Bielski (2023): Shift from Judicial Discretion to a Mandatory Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of an Interlocutory Appeal from the Denial of a Motion to Compel Arbitration
Boaz S. Morag and Peter E. Carzis
35Cmb Monaco V. Smagin (2023)
Katharine Menéndez de la Cuesta and Rafael Francisco Alves
36Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski et al. (2024): Delegation versus Forum Selection Clause, Contradictory Contracts, and Kompetenz-Kompetenz Doctrine
Peter C. Sester
Index