Understanding the Evolving Meaning of Reason in David Novak's Natural Law Theory: Philosophy of Religion - World Religions, cartea 10
Autor Jonathan L. Milevskyen Limba Engleză Hardback – 26 ian 2022
Preț: 531.22 lei
Preț vechi: 647.83 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 797
Preț estimativ în valută:
101.65€ • 107.19$ • 84.63£
101.65€ • 107.19$ • 84.63£
Carte indisponibilă temporar
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789004504356
ISBN-10: 9004504354
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill
Seria Philosophy of Religion - World Religions
ISBN-10: 9004504354
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill
Seria Philosophy of Religion - World Religions
Cuprins
Introduction
1David Novak’s Two Accounts of Natural Law
2The Significance of Natural Law to Novak’s Thought
3The Purpose of this Text
4Previous Scholarship
1 The Changing Content of Natural Law
1Introduction
2A Chronology of Novak’s Natural Law Theory
2.1Law and Theology in Judaism
2.2The Image of the Non-Jew in Judaism
2.3Halakhah in a Theological Dimension
2.4“Natural Law and Normative Judaism”
2.5“The Commandments: Divine Will or Divine Wisdom”
2.6“Natural Law, Halakhah, and the Covenant”
2.7Jewish Social Ethics
2.8Review of Menachem Elon’s “Jewish Law”
2.9“Religious Communities, Secular Society, and Sexuality”
2.10 Natural Law in Judaism
2.11 Talking with Christians
2.12 “The Universality of Jewish Ethics: A Rejoinder to Secularist Critics”
2.13 The Sanctity of Human Life
2.14 Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue
2.15 Zionism and Judaism: A New Theory and Jewish Justice: The Contested Limits of Nature, Law, and Covenant
2.16 “Does Natural Law Need Theology?”
3Analysis
4Conclusion
2 The Context of Novak’s Natural Law Theory
1Introduction
2The Philosophical Impact
2.1Is Natural Law a Legal or Theological Concept?
2.2Is Natural Law Autonomous or Heteronomous?
2.3Is There any Content to the Natural Law?
2.4Is the Noahide Code Aufgehoben by the Mosaic Law?
3Conclusion
3 The Theological Impact of a Changing Natural Law Theory
1Introduction
2The Significance of Redemption for Novak
3The Context for this Analysis
4A Chronology of Novak’s Treatment of Redemption
4.1Halakhah in a Theological Dimension and “The Role of Dogma in Judaism”
4.2Jewish-Christian Dialogue
4.3Jewish Social Ethics
4.4The Election of Israel
4.5Natural Law in Judaism
4.6Covenantal Rights
4.7Talking with Christians
4.8Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue
4.9“Does Natural Law Need Theology?”
5Analysis
6Can a Passive Messianist be a Natural Law Theorist?
7Considering Leora Batnitzky’s Question
8Conclusion
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
1David Novak’s Two Accounts of Natural Law
2The Significance of Natural Law to Novak’s Thought
3The Purpose of this Text
4Previous Scholarship
1 The Changing Content of Natural Law
1Introduction
2A Chronology of Novak’s Natural Law Theory
2.1Law and Theology in Judaism
2.2The Image of the Non-Jew in Judaism
2.3Halakhah in a Theological Dimension
2.4“Natural Law and Normative Judaism”
2.5“The Commandments: Divine Will or Divine Wisdom”
2.6“Natural Law, Halakhah, and the Covenant”
2.7Jewish Social Ethics
2.8Review of Menachem Elon’s “Jewish Law”
2.9“Religious Communities, Secular Society, and Sexuality”
2.10 Natural Law in Judaism
2.11 Talking with Christians
2.12 “The Universality of Jewish Ethics: A Rejoinder to Secularist Critics”
2.13 The Sanctity of Human Life
2.14 Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue
2.15 Zionism and Judaism: A New Theory and Jewish Justice: The Contested Limits of Nature, Law, and Covenant
2.16 “Does Natural Law Need Theology?”
3Analysis
4Conclusion
2 The Context of Novak’s Natural Law Theory
1Introduction
2The Philosophical Impact
2.1Is Natural Law a Legal or Theological Concept?
2.2Is Natural Law Autonomous or Heteronomous?
2.3Is There any Content to the Natural Law?
2.4Is the Noahide Code Aufgehoben by the Mosaic Law?
3Conclusion
3 The Theological Impact of a Changing Natural Law Theory
1Introduction
2The Significance of Redemption for Novak
3The Context for this Analysis
4A Chronology of Novak’s Treatment of Redemption
4.1Halakhah in a Theological Dimension and “The Role of Dogma in Judaism”
4.2Jewish-Christian Dialogue
4.3Jewish Social Ethics
4.4The Election of Israel
4.5Natural Law in Judaism
4.6Covenantal Rights
4.7Talking with Christians
4.8Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue
4.9“Does Natural Law Need Theology?”
5Analysis
6Can a Passive Messianist be a Natural Law Theorist?
7Considering Leora Batnitzky’s Question
8Conclusion
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
Notă biografică
Jonathan L. Milevsky, Ph.D. (2017), McMaster University, is a graduate of Ner Israel Rabbinical College in Baltimore, MD. He has published articles in the Journal of Religious Ethics, Canadian Jewish Studies, Journal of Textual Reasoning, Jewish Studies Internet Journal, and Hakira, and has two forthcoming entries in the Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception. He is a lecturer in the Department of Jewish History at Tanenbaum Community Hebrew Academy in Toronto, Canada and is a distinguished fellow at the Broughton Park Dialogue Group in the UK.