Examines how violence was described and evaluated in the foundational texts of Islam How was violence justified in early Islam? What role did violent actions play in the formation and maintenance of the Muslim political order? How did Muslim thinkers view the origins and acceptability of violence? These questions are addressed by an international range of eminent authors through both general accounts of types of violence and detailed case studies of violent acts drawn from the early Islamic sources. Violence is understood, widely, to include jihād, state repressions and rebellions, and also more personally directed violence against victims (women, animals, children, slaves) and criminals. By understanding the early development of Muslim thinking around violence, our comprehension of subsequent trends in Islamic thought, during the medieval period and up to the modern day, become clearer. Key Features - Examines the portrayal of violence in a variety of different intellectual contexts - Takes a broad understanding of violence - from warfare between Muslims (and between Muslims and others) to individual acts of violence - Enables a better informed debate about the nature of violence in early Islam - Includes contributions from leading international experts including Michael Cooperson, Maribel Fierro, Geert Jan van Gelder, Christopher Melchert, John T. Nawas, Andrew Rippin and Dominique Urvoy István Kristó-Nagy is a Lecturer in Arab and Islamic Studies at the University of Exeter. He is the author of La pensée d'Ibn al-Muqaffac (2013) Robert Gleave is Professor of Arabic Studies at the University of Exeter and was Director of the Legitimate and Illegitimate Violence Project 2010-13. His most recent publications include Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory (Edinburgh University Press, 2012) Cover image: Bahram Gur and Azada, ceramic plate 12/13th Century, image courtesy of Metropolitan Museum of Art. Cover design: [EUP logo] www.euppublishing.com