Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Why the UK Voted for Brexit: David Cameron's Great Miscalculation: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics

Autor Andrew Glencross
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 3 noi 2016
This book studies the unprecedented decision of 23 June 2016, which saw the UK electorate vote to leave the EU, turning David Cameron’s referendum gamble into a great miscalculation. It analyzes the renegotiation that preceded the vote, before examining the campaign itself so as to understand why the government’s strategy for winning foundered. It then evaluates the implications that this decision has for the country’s international relations as well as for its domestic politics. The author’s final reflections are on the political philosophy of Brexit, which is founded on a critique of representative democracy. Yet the use of direct democracy to trigger EU withdrawal leaves the supposedly sovereign British people at an impasse. For it is up to the people’s representatives to negotiate the terms of Brexit. By engaging with a highly charged political debate in an accessible and non-partisan manner this book will appeal to a broad readership of academics, policy-makers, journalists, and interested citizens.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics

Preț: 44106 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 662

Preț estimativ în valută:
8441 8768$ 7011£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 04-18 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781137590008
ISBN-10: 1137590009
Pagini: 95
Ilustrații: VIII, 82 p. 3 illus. in color.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.31 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2016
Editura: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Colecția Palgrave Pivot
Seria Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics

Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Cuprins

Chapter 1 Introduction: The Great Miscalculation.- Chapter 2 The Forty-Year “Neverendum” on the UK’s Relationship with Europe.- Chapter 3 Renegotiating Terms of EU Membership Prior to the referendum.- Chapter 4 The EU Referendum Campaign.- Chapter 5 The Unfinished Business of Brexit.- Chapter 6 Rousseau’s Revenge: The Political Philosophy of Brexit.- References.- Index.

Recenzii

“Very readable and very to the point, Why The UK Voted For Brexit is a brave and altogether timely book, which absolutely needs to be read by anyone and everyone who actually cares about Britain and it’s future.” (David Marx, David Marx Book Reviews, davidmarxbookreviews.wordpress.com, July, 2017)  
“It is the first substantial treatment of the political processes underpinning the EU referendum … . this work succeeds in carrying through a coherent message that combines historical, analytical and theoretical perspectives. … Its detailed and historically sensitive discussion of the referendum process will nevertheless remain an important document for those seeking to understand this momentous event, while its theoretical foray opens up comparative analyses with broader global phenomena driven by ‘Rousseau’s revenge’.” (Chris Moreh, LSE Review of Books, blogs.lse.ac.uk, March, 2017)

Notă biografică

Andrew Glencross is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Politics and International Relations, Aston University, UK. He has published widely on the politics of European integration in journals such as Journal of Common Market Studies, International Affairs, Political Studies, and The Political Quarterly. He is a Senior Fellow of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, Philadelphia.

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This book studies the unprecedented decision of 23 June 2016, which saw the UK electorate vote to leave the EU, turning David Cameron’s referendum gamble into a great miscalculation. It analyzes the renegotiation that preceded the vote, before examining the campaign itself so as to understand why the government’s strategy for winning foundered. It then evaluates the implications that this decision has for the country’s international relations as well as for its domestic politics. The author’s final reflections are on the political philosophy of Brexit, which is founded on a critique of representative democracy. Yet the use of direct democracy to trigger EU withdrawal leaves the supposedly sovereign British people at an impasse. For it is up to the people’s representatives to negotiate the terms of Brexit. By engaging with a highly charged political debate in an accessible and non-partisan manner this book will appeal to a broad readership of academics, policy-makers, journ
alists, and interested citizens.Andrew Glencross is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Politics and International Relations, Aston University, UK. He has published widely on the politics of European integration in journals such as Journal of Common Market StudiesInternational Affairs, Political Studies, and The Political Quarterly. He is a Senior Fellow of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, Philadelphia.


Caracteristici

Provides one of the first studies into the causes and effects of the dramatic result of the referendum on Britain's membership of the EU
Traces the history of Euroscepticism in Britain before analysing the 2016 referendum campaign on both sides
Uses the Brexit result to develop discussions concerning sovereignity and direct democracy in Britain