A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence: Volume 11: Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World
Autor Gerald J. Postemaen Limba Engleză Hardback – 5 aug 2011
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 590.37 lei 39-44 zile | |
SPRINGER NETHERLANDS – 22 oct 2016 | 590.37 lei 39-44 zile | |
Hardback (1) | 917.36 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
SPRINGER NETHERLANDS – 5 aug 2011 | 917.36 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 917.36 lei
Preț vechi: 1118.73 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 1376
Preț estimativ în valută:
175.62€ • 183.24$ • 147.21£
175.62€ • 183.24$ • 147.21£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 13-27 martie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789048189595
ISBN-10: 9048189594
Pagini: 650
Ilustrații: XXV, 618 p.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 41 mm
Greutate: 1.2 kg
Ediția:2011
Editura: SPRINGER NETHERLANDS
Colecția Springer
Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands
ISBN-10: 9048189594
Pagini: 650
Ilustrații: XXV, 618 p.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 41 mm
Greutate: 1.2 kg
Ediția:2011
Editura: SPRINGER NETHERLANDS
Colecția Springer
Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands
Public țintă
ResearchCuprins
A Note on the Author.- General Editor’s Preface to Volumes 11 and 12 of the Treatise.- Preface to Volume 11.- Acknowledgements .- Part I – Prologue.- Chapter 1 - Analytic Jurisprudence Established.- Chapter 2 - Justice Holmes: A New Path for American Jurisprudence.- Chapter 3 - Realism and Reaction.- Chapter 4 - Implicit Law and Principles of Legality.- Chapter 5 - Economic Jurisprudence.- Chapter 6 - Critical Jurisprudence and the Rule of Law.- Chapter 7 - Hart’s Critical Positivism.- Chapter 8 - Positivism Extended: Institutions, Sources, Authority, and Law and Moral Reasoning.- Chapter 9 - Positivism Challenged: Interpretation, Integrity, and Law.- Chapter 10 - The Incorporation Debate.- Chapter 11 - Conventions and the Foundations of Law.- Chapter 12 - Analytic Jurisprudence Confronted.- Chapter 13 - Concluding Note.- Bibliography.- Index of Subjects.- Index of Names.
Recenzii
“Gerald Postema surveys developments in the twentieth century. ... Every thinking lawyer should be informed and stimulated by these books, and as for the iurisperiti, any unthinking lawyers should acquire them in order to stimulate thought.” (Andrew Halpin, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, September, 2017)
“The volume is a magisterial achievement, and should serve as a valuable resource for specialists and non-specialists alike for years to come. … the chapters are helpfully written as mostly self-standing expositions of a manageable number of theorists and arguments; the result is that the chapters and subsections are useful essays in their own right, for both research and pedagogical purposes.” (Michael Sevel, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, ndpr.nd.edu, April, 2015)
“A book for sophisticated students of legal theory where one learns more and better what the best 20th century jurisprudential works contained and what they should have said or failed insaying. … Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World is a brilliant book and, for the rest of us incapable of achieving anything like this … it is simply breathtaking.” (Richard Bronaugh, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 27 (2), July, 2014)
“The volume is a magisterial achievement, and should serve as a valuable resource for specialists and non-specialists alike for years to come. … the chapters are helpfully written as mostly self-standing expositions of a manageable number of theorists and arguments; the result is that the chapters and subsections are useful essays in their own right, for both research and pedagogical purposes.” (Michael Sevel, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, ndpr.nd.edu, April, 2015)
“A book for sophisticated students of legal theory where one learns more and better what the best 20th century jurisprudential works contained and what they should have said or failed insaying. … Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World is a brilliant book and, for the rest of us incapable of achieving anything like this … it is simply breathtaking.” (Richard Bronaugh, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 27 (2), July, 2014)
Notă biografică
Gerald J. Postema has published extensively in legal and political philosophy and ethics. In 2011 he published Legal Philosophy in the 20th Century: The Common Law World, He wrote Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (Clarendon 1986/1989) and edited Racism and the Law (Kluwer 1997); Rationality, Conventions, and the Law (Kluwer 1998); Jeremy Bentham: Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy (Ashgate 2002) and Philosophy and the Law of Torts (CUP 2001). He is associate editor of the 12 volume, Treatise in the Philosophy of Law (Springer 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011).
Textul de pe ultima copertă
Volume 11, the sixth of the historical volumes of A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, offers a fresh, philosophically engaged, critical interpretation of the main currents of jurisprudential thought in the English-speaking world of the 20th century. It tells the tale of two lectures and their legacies: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.’s “The Path of Law” (1897) and H.L.A. Hart’s Holmes Lecture, “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals” (1958). Holmes’s radical challenge to late 19th century legal science gave birth to a rich variety of competing approaches to understanding law and legal reasoning from realism to economic jurisprudence to legal pragmatism, from recovery of key elements of common law jurisprudence and rule of law doctrine in the work of Llewellyn, Fuller and Hayek to root-and-branch attacks on the ideology of law by the Critical Legal Studies and Feminist movements. Hart, simultaneously building upon and transforming the undations of Austinian analytic jurisprudence laid in the early 20th century, introduced rigorous philosophical method to English-speaking jurisprudence and offered a reinterpretation of legal positivism which set the agenda for analytic legal philosophy to the end of the century and beyond. A wide-ranging debate over the role of moral principles in legal reasoning, sparked by Dworkin’s fundamental challenge to Hart’s theory, generated competing interpretations of and fundamental challenges to core doctrines of Hart’s positivism, including the nature and role of conventions at the foundations of law and the methodology of philosophical jurisprudence.
Caracteristici
First-ever multivolume treatment of all important issues in the legal philosophy-field A classical reference work Edited by the renowned theorist Enrico Pattaro and his team