Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Adjudicative Competence: The MacArthur Studies: Perspectives in Law & Psychology, cartea 15

Autor Norman G. Poythress Jr., Richard J. Bonnie, John Monahan, Randy Otto, Steven K. Hoge
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 7 sep 2012
Adjudicative competence remains an important topic of research and practice in psychology and law. In the five sections of Adjudicative Competence: The MacArthur Studies, the authors present not only a summary of the research of the MacArthur studies on competence but also an examination of the underlying theoretical work of Professor Richard Bonnie. It is the first publication to encapsulate the scope and significance of both the studies themselves and Bonnie's contributions. There is no other source available that addresses this range of topics.
Given its breadth and scope, this book will be a "must have" for forensic mental health professionals, an important volume for lawyers, and a vital academic reference work.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 69145 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer Us – 7 sep 2012 69145 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 64153 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer Us – 31 aug 2002 64153 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Perspectives in Law & Psychology

Preț: 69145 lei

Preț vechi: 81347 lei
-15% Nou

Puncte Express: 1037

Preț estimativ în valută:
13233 13698$ 11185£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 05-19 martie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781461346296
ISBN-10: 1461346290
Pagini: 184
Ilustrații: XIV, 165 p.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 10 mm
Greutate: 0.27 kg
Ediția:Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2002
Editura: Springer Us
Colecția Springer
Seria Perspectives in Law & Psychology

Locul publicării:New York, NY, United States

Public țintă

Professional/practitioner

Cuprins

1: The Nature of Competence to Participate in Adjudication.- Study 1.- Study 2.- Study 3.- Study 4.- Study 5.- Conclusion.- 2: Adjudicative Competence in Legal Theory and Practice.- Toward a Theory-Based Understanding.- Values Served by the Competence Requirement.- Components of Adjudicative Competence.- Limits of the Unitary View.- Competence Adjudication in Practice.- 3: Development of an Adjudicative Competence Research Measure: The Network’s Adjudicative Competence Research Agenda.- The Limitations of First Generation Measures of Adjudicative Competence.- The Research Agenda.- Design and Development of the MacSAC-CD.- The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Field Studies.- Method.- Results I—Main Field Study (Male Defendants).- Results II—Female Defendants.- Discussion.- 4: Research Issues in Adjudicative Competence.- Study 1: Diagnosis, Mental Status, and Legal Capacity.- Discussion.- Study 2: A Comparison of Criteria for Adjudicative Competence.- Results.- Discussion.- Study 3: Comparison of Adjudicative Competence and Civil Competence.- Results.- Discussion.- 5: Development of the Macarthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (The MacCAT-CA).- The MacCAT-CA.- The NIMH Norming Study.- Method.- Results.- Discussion.- 6: New Research on Adjudicative Competence.- The Competence-Related Abilities of Youth in Juvenile Court.- The Competence-Related Abilities of Youth in Criminal Court.- The MacCAT-CA and Defendants with Mental Retardation.- Competence Assessment in Other Countries.- Conclusion.- References.