An Unprecedented Election: Media, Communication, and the Electorate in the 2016 Campaign
Editat de Benjamin R. Warner, Dianne G. Bystrom, Mitchell S. McKinney, Mary C. Banwarten Limba Engleză Paperback – 27 dec 2023
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 197.17 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Bloomsbury Publishing – 27 dec 2023 | 197.17 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 420.81 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Bloomsbury Publishing – 20 feb 2018 | 420.81 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 197.17 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 296
Preț estimativ în valută:
37.75€ • 38.94$ • 31.29£
37.75€ • 38.94$ • 31.29£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 20 februarie-06 martie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9798765118115
Pagini: 456
Dimensiuni: 156 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.64 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Pagini: 456
Dimensiuni: 156 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.64 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Caracteristici
Presents contributions from top scholars in political communication representing the very best doctoral programs in the field, including numerous past presidents of the National Communication Association's political communication division
Notă biografică
Benjamin R. Warner, PhD, is assistant professor of communication at the University of Missouri.Dianne G. Bystrom, PhD, is director of the Carrie Chapman Catt Center for Women and Politics at Iowa State University.Mitchell S. McKinney, PhD, is professor of communication at the University of Missouri and currently serves as faculty fellow for academic personnel in the Office of the Provost.Mary C. Banwart, PhD, is associate professor in the Communication Studies Department at the University of Kansas and director of the Institute for Leadership Studies.
Cuprins
Introduction Understanding the Unprecedented 2016 Campaign: Two Historical Candidacies Yield an Unexpected ResultBenjamin R. Warner and Dianne G. BystromPart One Media CoverageChapter 1 Selective Exposure and Homophily During the 2016 Presidential CampaignNatalie Jomini Stroud and Jessica R. CollierChapter 2 What Mobilizes Partisans? Exploring the Underlying Pathways Between Partisan Media and Political ParticipationHeesook Choi, Benjamin R. Warner, and Freddie J. JenningsChapter 3 Media Event Influence in the 2016 Race: The Debates, Trump Groping Tape, and the Last-Minute FBI AnnouncementEsther Thorson, Samuel M. Tham, Weiyue Chen, and Vamsi KanuriChapter 4 The Rhetoric of Impossible Expectations: Media Coverage of Hillary Clinton's 2016 General Election CampaignKristina Horn SheelerChapter 5 Depends on Who Is Asking: An Endorsement Experiment During the 2016 Presidential ElectionKalyca Becktel and Kaye D. SweetserChapter 6 Attributions of Incivility in Presidential Campaign NewsAshley MuddimanChapter 7 Fact-Checking and the 2016 Presidential Election: News Media's Attempts to Correct Misleading Information from the DebatesDaniela V. Dimitrova and Kimberly NelsonChapter 8 "I'm About to Be President; We're All Going to Die": Baldwin, Trump, and the Rhetorical Power of Comedic Presidential ImpersonationWill Howell and Trevor Parry-GilesPart Two Campaign CommunicationChapter 9 Processing the Political: Presidential Primary Debate "Live-Tweeting" as Information ProcessingJosh C. Bramlett, Mitchell S. McKinney, and Benjamin R. WarnerChapter 10 Donald Trump and the Rejection of the Norms of American Politics and RhetoricRobert C. RowlandChapter 11 "The Greatest Country on Earth": The Evolution of Michelle Obama's American DreamRyan Neville-Shepard and Meredith Neville-ShepardChapter 12 Loss of Faith: A Realignment of Religion on the Campaign TrailBrian KaylorChapter 13 Late Night with Donald Trump: An Exploration of the Combined Effects of Political Comedy and Political AdvertisingFreddie J. Jennings, Calvin R. Coker, Josh C. Bramlett, Joel Lansing Reed, and Joshua P. BoltonChapter 14 Going on Defense: The Unprecedented Use of Defensive Appeals in 2016 U.S. Presidential DebatesCorey B. DavisChapter 15 Gender and Videostyle in 2016: Advertising in Mixed-Gender Races for the U.S. HouseKelly L. Winfrey and James M. SchnoebelenChapter 16 From Interactivity to Incitement: Ubiquitous Communication and Elite Calls for ParticipationJoshua M. Scacco, Kevin Coe, and Delaney HarnessPart Three Communication Attitudes and Behaviors of the ElectorateChapter 17 Corn Belt Controversy: Intraparty Divisions and Political Cynicism at the 2016 Iowa CaucusesJoel Lansing Reed, Sopheak Hoeun, Josh C. Bramlett, Molly Greenwood, and Grace HaseChapter 18 Exploring and Explaining Communication, Knowledge, and Well-Being Sex Differences Related to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary SeasonR. Lance Holbert, Esul Park, and Nicholas W. RobinsonChapter 19 Gender and the Vote in the 2016 Presidential ElectionKate KenskiChapter 20 #election#elección: Latino Twitter Users and Reactions to Presidential Political GaffesSamantha HernandezChapter 21 Analyzing Tweets About the 2016 U.S. Presidential "Blunder" ElectionMichael W. KearneyChapter 22 Understanding the Authoritarian Voter in the 2016 Presidential ElectionSumana ChattopadhyayChapter 23 Social Dominance, Sexism, and the Lasting Effects on Political Communication from the 2016 ElectionMary C. Banwart and Michael W. KearneyAbout the Editors and ContributorsIndex
Recenzii
Any researcher, from the mildly curious to the 24-hour-cable-news-cycle obsessed, will find something of interest in these pages.
This scholarly, balanced compilation effectively sheds light on an election that continues to confound experts and prognosticators alike, presenting not only original insights into the events and outcomes of 2016 but also clues of what may lie ahead. VERDICT Political junkies and undergraduate/graduate students will find this a clear-sighted resource.
This volume adds to the literature by offering a look at this event through an academic lens situated in the communication discipline. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.
These academic studies are built around carefully defined hypotheses with narrowly drawn results and therefore do not provide a blueprint for future candidates to follow. Their value is to portray how the 2016 election broke all the rules. Because this research was conducted soon after the election, the dynamics of the campaign and the perceptions and opinions of the American electorate were captured while the campaign cycle was still fresh in the public mind, providing a rich resource for scholars as we get further removed from this tumultuous election.
This scholarly, balanced compilation effectively sheds light on an election that continues to confound experts and prognosticators alike, presenting not only original insights into the events and outcomes of 2016 but also clues of what may lie ahead. VERDICT Political junkies and undergraduate/graduate students will find this a clear-sighted resource.
This volume adds to the literature by offering a look at this event through an academic lens situated in the communication discipline. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.
These academic studies are built around carefully defined hypotheses with narrowly drawn results and therefore do not provide a blueprint for future candidates to follow. Their value is to portray how the 2016 election broke all the rules. Because this research was conducted soon after the election, the dynamics of the campaign and the perceptions and opinions of the American electorate were captured while the campaign cycle was still fresh in the public mind, providing a rich resource for scholars as we get further removed from this tumultuous election.