Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason
Autor Federico Zuoloen Limba Engleză Hardback – 18 iul 2020
Reconstructing the epistemic nature of disagreement about animals, Zuolo proposes a novel form of public justification to find principles acceptable to all. By setting out a unified framework which honours the liberal principles of respect for diversity, a robust liberal political theory capable of dealing with diverse forms of disagreement, and even some forms of radical dissent, is achieved.
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 379.22 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Springer International Publishing – 18 iul 2021 | 379.22 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 385.44 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Springer International Publishing – 18 iul 2020 | 385.44 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 385.44 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 578
Preț estimativ în valută:
73.79€ • 76.81$ • 60.75£
73.79€ • 76.81$ • 60.75£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 01-15 februarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9783030495084
ISBN-10: 3030495086
Pagini: 280
Ilustrații: XIII, 280 p. 3 illus.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 mm
Greutate: 0.54 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2020
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Palgrave Macmillan
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland
ISBN-10: 3030495086
Pagini: 280
Ilustrații: XIII, 280 p. 3 illus.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 mm
Greutate: 0.54 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2020
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Palgrave Macmillan
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland
Cuprins
Chapter 1. Introduction.- Chapter 2. Animal Treatment as a Matter of Reasonable Disagreement.- Chapter 3. Public Justification and the Disagreement on Animals.- Chapter 4. Views on the Moral Status of Animals.- Chapter 5. Applying Public Justification: Interests, Principles, and Competing Reasons.- Chapter 6. Addressing Unlawfulness: Admissible and Non-Admissible Forms of Protest.- Chapter 7. Conclusion.
Recenzii
“The application of the views on animals directly to the question of policy is certainly more determinate and helpful. … Zuolo has provided the first substantial engagement with political legitimacy and public justification in the context of animal political philosophy, and for that reason his work deserves consideration.” (Marcus Schultz-Bergin, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)
Notă biografică
Federico Zuolo is Associate Professor in Political Philosophy at the University of Genoa, Italy. Previously, he was Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Senior Fellow at the Universities of Berlin and Hamburg in Germany, and research fellow at the University of Pavia, Italy.
Textul de pe ultima copertă
This book explores the problem of disagreement concerning the treatment of animals in a liberal society. Current laws include an unprecedented concern for animal welfare, yet disagreement remains pervasive. This issue has so far been neglected both in political philosophy and animal ethics. Although starting from disagreement has been the hallmark of many politically liberal theories, none have been devoted to the treatment of animals, and conversely, most theories in animal ethics do not take the disagreement on this issue seriously. Bridging this divide with a change of perspective, Zuolo argues that we should begin from the disagreement on the moral status of animals and the treatment we owe them.
Reconstructing the epistemic nature of disagreement about animals, Zuolo proposes a novel form of public justification to find principles acceptable to all. By setting out a unified framework which honours the liberal principles of respect for diversity, a robust liberal political theory capable of dealing with diverse forms of disagreement, and even some forms of radical dissent, is achieved.
Reconstructing the epistemic nature of disagreement about animals, Zuolo proposes a novel form of public justification to find principles acceptable to all. By setting out a unified framework which honours the liberal principles of respect for diversity, a robust liberal political theory capable of dealing with diverse forms of disagreement, and even some forms of radical dissent, is achieved.
Caracteristici
Reconstructs the epistemic nature of disagreement about animals Proposes a liberal political theory that seeks to outline an inclusive set of principles that can be accepted by all Considers diverse views including animal rights, utilitarianism, feminism and environmentalism to understand what values underpin peoples' views on animals