Assessing the Common European Asylum System: Discretionary implementation and street-level bureaucracy: Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law, cartea 25
Autor Radu-Mihai Triculescuen Limba Engleză Hardback – 31 oct 2024
Din seria Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law
- 18% Preț: 842.36 lei
- 18% Preț: 871.63 lei
- 18% Preț: 748.42 lei
- 18% Preț: 926.81 lei
- 18% Preț: 812.96 lei
- 18% Preț: 961.42 lei
- 18% Preț: 971.31 lei
- 18% Preț: 852.65 lei
- 18% Preț: 763.06 lei
- 18% Preț: 1185.52 lei
- 18% Preț: 832.88 lei
- 18% Preț: 1056.86 lei
- 18% Preț: 963.07 lei
- 18% Preț: 1035.93 lei
- 18% Preț: 712.65 lei
- 18% Preț: 1028.75 lei
- 18% Preț: 857.61 lei
- 18% Preț: 985.58 lei
Preț: 749.09 lei
Preț vechi: 913.52 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 1124
Preț estimativ în valută:
143.41€ • 149.06$ • 118.90£
143.41€ • 149.06$ • 118.90£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 17-22 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789004700819
ISBN-10: 9004700811
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.48 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law
ISBN-10: 9004700811
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.48 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law
Notă biografică
Radu-Mihai Triculescu is a postdoctoral research fellow at LMU Munich, where he researches synchronisation and time in policymaking, with a specific focus on asylum policy. He is the author of Dublin is Dead: A study in delegitimation (2022).
Cuprins
List of Tables
1Introduction
1 Engaging with the State of the Art
2 The ceas: A Long Journey to Ambiguous Complexity
2Discretionary Implementation: Ambiguity and the Work of Street-Level Bureaucrats
1 Discretionary Implementation in Multilevel EU
2 The Breeding Ground for Ambiguity in Multilevel Governance
3 Role Theory and Ambiguity
3The Common European Asylum System
1 Dublin Regulation
2 euaa and eurodac
2.1The European Union Agency for Asylum (euaa)
2.2eurodac
3 Receptions Conditions Directive
4 Qualifications Directive
4.1The Qualification Directive at First Glance: A Literal Analysis of Discretionary Clauses
5 Procedures Directive
5.1Untangling the Procedures Directive: A Literal Analysis of Provisions
4Interpretive Ambiguities: Case Law and Guidance
1 The Union’s Approach to National Implementation Post-2015
2 Case Law
3 Interpretive Ambiguities: The Work of the cjeu in Identifying and Dispelling Ambiguities
3.1General Provisions (Articles 1–3)
3.2Assessment of Applications for International Protection (Articles 4–8)
3.3Qualifications for Being a Refugee (Articles 9–12)
3.4Chapter iv – Refugee Status (Articles 13–14)
3.5Qualification for Subsidiary Protection (Articles 15–19)
3.6Chapter vi – Subsidiary Protection Status (Articles 18–19)
3.7Content of international Protection and Administrative Cooperation (Articles 20–37); Final Provisions
4 Judicial and Legislative Analysis of the Procedures Directive
4.1Initiating the Procedures: Rules for Lodging an Application for Asylum
4.2Procedural Guarantees
4.3The Personal Interview
4.4Procedural Guarantees for an Individual Assessment
4.5Guarantees for the Examination Procedure at First Instance
4.6Withdrawal of International Protection and Effective Remedy
5 Conclusions
5National Implementation of the ceas: The Case of Romania
1 Constitution, Human Rights, and Good Governance
2 oug 57/2019 – The Administrative Code
3 Managing Asylum in Romania
3.1The Structure and Role of The General Inspectorate for Immigration (igi)
3.2Law 122/2006 regarding Asylum in Romania and Its Norms of Implementation
3.3Scope and Definitions in the Law
3.4Procedural Guarantees
3.5Street-Level Bureaucrats in Law 122
3.6First Instance Decisions – Architecture, Rights, and Obligations
4 Conclusion
6National Implementation of the ceas: The Case of the Netherlands
1 The Principles of Governance: The Dutch Constitution
2 Public Service in the Netherlands
2.1The General Administrative Law Act
3 Entering the Asylum Procedure
3.1General Procedure
3.2Conditions of Work: Implementing Provisions at the Street-Level
3.3European Framework and Safe Countries of Origin
3.4Institutional Capacity
3.5Work Guidance
3.6Credibility Assessment
4 Conclusion
7Beyond Black on White: A Nuanced View of Discretion
1 European Ambiguity
2 Building the Discretionary Space
3 Final Thoughts on Discretionary Implementation
Bibliography
Index
1Introduction
1 Engaging with the State of the Art
2 The ceas: A Long Journey to Ambiguous Complexity
2Discretionary Implementation: Ambiguity and the Work of Street-Level Bureaucrats
1 Discretionary Implementation in Multilevel EU
2 The Breeding Ground for Ambiguity in Multilevel Governance
3 Role Theory and Ambiguity
3The Common European Asylum System
1 Dublin Regulation
2 euaa and eurodac
2.1The European Union Agency for Asylum (euaa)
2.2eurodac
3 Receptions Conditions Directive
4 Qualifications Directive
4.1The Qualification Directive at First Glance: A Literal Analysis of Discretionary Clauses
5 Procedures Directive
5.1Untangling the Procedures Directive: A Literal Analysis of Provisions
4Interpretive Ambiguities: Case Law and Guidance
1 The Union’s Approach to National Implementation Post-2015
2 Case Law
3 Interpretive Ambiguities: The Work of the cjeu in Identifying and Dispelling Ambiguities
3.1General Provisions (Articles 1–3)
3.2Assessment of Applications for International Protection (Articles 4–8)
3.3Qualifications for Being a Refugee (Articles 9–12)
3.4Chapter iv – Refugee Status (Articles 13–14)
3.5Qualification for Subsidiary Protection (Articles 15–19)
3.6Chapter vi – Subsidiary Protection Status (Articles 18–19)
3.7Content of international Protection and Administrative Cooperation (Articles 20–37); Final Provisions
4 Judicial and Legislative Analysis of the Procedures Directive
4.1Initiating the Procedures: Rules for Lodging an Application for Asylum
4.2Procedural Guarantees
4.3The Personal Interview
4.4Procedural Guarantees for an Individual Assessment
4.5Guarantees for the Examination Procedure at First Instance
4.6Withdrawal of International Protection and Effective Remedy
5 Conclusions
5National Implementation of the ceas: The Case of Romania
1 Constitution, Human Rights, and Good Governance
2 oug 57/2019 – The Administrative Code
3 Managing Asylum in Romania
3.1The Structure and Role of The General Inspectorate for Immigration (igi)
3.2Law 122/2006 regarding Asylum in Romania and Its Norms of Implementation
3.3Scope and Definitions in the Law
3.4Procedural Guarantees
3.5Street-Level Bureaucrats in Law 122
3.6First Instance Decisions – Architecture, Rights, and Obligations
4 Conclusion
6National Implementation of the ceas: The Case of the Netherlands
1 The Principles of Governance: The Dutch Constitution
2 Public Service in the Netherlands
2.1The General Administrative Law Act
3 Entering the Asylum Procedure
3.1General Procedure
3.2Conditions of Work: Implementing Provisions at the Street-Level
3.3European Framework and Safe Countries of Origin
3.4Institutional Capacity
3.5Work Guidance
3.6Credibility Assessment
4 Conclusion
7Beyond Black on White: A Nuanced View of Discretion
1 European Ambiguity
2 Building the Discretionary Space
3 Final Thoughts on Discretionary Implementation
Bibliography
Index