Bootstrapping Stationary ARMA-GARCH Models
Autor Kenichi Shimizuen Limba Engleză Paperback – 27 ian 2010
Preț: 367.36 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 551
Preț estimativ în valută:
70.31€ • 73.28$ • 58.53£
70.31€ • 73.28$ • 58.53£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 06-20 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9783834809926
ISBN-10: 3834809926
Pagini: 148
Ilustrații: 148 p. 12 illus.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.18 kg
Ediția:2010
Editura: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
Colecția Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
Locul publicării:Wiesbaden, Germany
ISBN-10: 3834809926
Pagini: 148
Ilustrații: 148 p. 12 illus.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.18 kg
Ediția:2010
Editura: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
Colecția Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
Locul publicării:Wiesbaden, Germany
Public țintă
ResearchCuprins
Bootstrap Does not Always Work.- Parametric AR(p)-ARCH(q) Models.- Parametric ARMA(p, q)- GARCH(r, s) Models.- Semiparametric AR(p)-ARCH(1) Models.
Notă biografică
Dr. Kenichi Shimizu completed his doctoral thesis at the Department of Mathematics at the Technical University, Braunschweig.
Textul de pe ultima copertă
Bootstrap technique is a useful tool for assessing uncertainty in statistical estimation and thus it is widely applied for risk management. Bootstrap is without doubt a promising technique, however, it is not applicable to all time series models. A wrong application could lead to a false decision to take too much risk.
Kenichi Shimizu investigates the limit of the two standard bootstrap techniques, the residual and the wild bootstrap, when these are applied to the conditionally heteroscedastic models, such as the ARCH and GARCH models. The author shows that the wild bootstrap usually does not work well when one estimates conditional heteroscedasticity of Engle’s ARCH or Bollerslev’s GARCH models while the residual bootstrap works without problems. Simulation studies from the application of the proposed bootstrap methods are demonstrated together with the theoretical investigation.
Kenichi Shimizu investigates the limit of the two standard bootstrap techniques, the residual and the wild bootstrap, when these are applied to the conditionally heteroscedastic models, such as the ARCH and GARCH models. The author shows that the wild bootstrap usually does not work well when one estimates conditional heteroscedasticity of Engle’s ARCH or Bollerslev’s GARCH models while the residual bootstrap works without problems. Simulation studies from the application of the proposed bootstrap methods are demonstrated together with the theoretical investigation.