Building Resilience and Planning for Extreme Water-Related Events: Palgrave Studies in Climate Resilient Societies
Autor Teresa Sprague, Kathrin Prenger-Berninghoffen Limba Engleză Paperback – 25 dec 2018
This
book
discusses
what
it
means
for
cities
to
work
toward
and
achieve
resilience
in
the
face
of
climate
change.
The
content
takes
an
urban
planning
perspective
with
a
water-related
focus,
exploring
the
continued
global
and
local
efforts
in
improving
disaster
risk
management
within
the
water
sphere.
Chapters
examine
four
cities
in
the
US
and
Germany
-
San
Francisco,
San
Diego,
Solingen
and
Wuppertal
-
as
the
core
case
studies
of
the
discussion.
The
chapters
for
each
case
delve
into
the
current
status
of
the
cities
and
issues
resilience
must
overcome,
and
then
explore
solutions
and
key
takeaways
learned
from
the
implementation
of
various
resilience
approaches.
The
book
concludes
with
a
summary
of
cross-cutting
themes,
best-practice
examples
and
a
reflection
on
the
relevance
of
the
approaches
to
cases
in
the
wider
developing
world.
This
book
engages
both
practitioners
and
scientific
audiences
alike,
particularly
those
interested
in
issues
addressed
by
the
Sendai
Framework
for
Disaster
Risk
Reduction
2015-2030,
the
2030
Agenda
for
Sustainable
Development,
the
recent
Water
Action
Decade
2018-2028
and
the
Rockefeller
Foundation’s
100
Resilient
Cities.
| Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
|---|---|---|
| Paperback (1) | 353.39 lei 39-44 zile | |
| Springer – 25 dec 2018 | 353.39 lei 39-44 zile | |
| Hardback (1) | 417.11 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Springer International Publishing – 25 oct 2018 | 417.11 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Din seria Palgrave Studies in Climate Resilient Societies
-
Preț: 358.68 lei -
Preț: 417.11 lei -
Preț: 419.40 lei -
Preț: 447.30 lei -
Preț: 412.78 lei -
Preț: 478.44 lei -
Preț: 447.80 lei - 15%
Preț: 461.84 lei -
Preț: 419.52 lei -
Preț: 348.24 lei -
Preț: 353.54 lei -
Preț: 409.94 lei
Preț: 353.39 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 530
Preț estimativ în valută:
67.67€ • 69.80$ • 56.08£
67.67€ • 69.80$ • 56.08£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 17-22 februarie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9783030076283
ISBN-10: 3030076288
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 mm
Greutate: 0.25 kg
Ediția:Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2019
Editura: Springer
Colecția Palgrave Pivot
Seria Palgrave Studies in Climate Resilient Societies
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland
ISBN-10: 3030076288
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 mm
Greutate: 0.25 kg
Ediția:Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2019
Editura: Springer
Colecția Palgrave Pivot
Seria Palgrave Studies in Climate Resilient Societies
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland
Cuprins
Introduction
(5
pages
max)
Solutions
pursued
(practical
solutions
focus)
Conclusion
&
Cross-Cutting
Themes
State
of
science
in
climate
resiliency
and
current
efforts
This
chapter
introduces
the
state
of
science
for
this
within
cities
and
urban
development,
addressing:
•What
do
we
mean
by
resilience?
(how
we
apply
this
in
a
practical
sense
–
so
implementation
within
an
urban
setting
–
what
does
it
mean
within
this
setting)
•What
is
meant
by
being
climate
resilient?
•Also
briefly
address
what
is
meant
by
social
readiness
(awareness
and
willingness
to
engage),
and
who
plays
the
main
roles
The
global
dialogue
and
examples
in
practice
•Should
present
the
state
of
global
dialogue
and
connect
to
other
major
global
policy
including
SDGs
and
post
Sendai
Framework
Examples
of
current
efforts
(global
scale
with
brief
mention
of
some
specific
examples)
•Provide
examples
from
e.g.
the
100
Resilient
cities
campaign
and
the
work
of
the
Rockefeller
Foundation
and
UNISDR
(also
current
developments
within
the
water
sector
side
of
this)
Chapter
setup
•The
chapters
presented
in
this
eBook
provide
a
series
of
practical
cases
from
Germany
and
the
US
•The
structure
of
these
chapters
is
as
follows:
oBrief
introduction
to
case
oCurrent
issues
faced
by
planning
and
current
natural
and
human
environmental
issues
oSolutions
pursued
(practical
solutions
focus)
oLearning
points
box
(basic
take
home
points
for
educational
focus)
Our
key
terms
[currently
will
use
from
combination
of
UNISDR
terminology
and
stakeholder
analysis
research,
to
be
updated
later]
•Resilience:
(to
be
added
shortly)
•Climate
resilient:
(to
be
added
shortly)
•Public
actors:
(to
be
added
shortly)
•Private
actors:
(to
be
added
shortly)
•Stakeholders:
(to
be
added
shortly)
Sample
Case
Chapter
Structure
(12
pages
max)
[this
section
to
be
removed
in
final
version
and
for
now
serves
as
a
chapter
guidance]
Brief
introduction
to
case
•This
brief
section
provides
an
idea
for
the
reader
of
location,
demographics,
land
use
distribution,
natural
and
human-based
resources
•It
should
also
be
stated
whether
the
case
is
connected
to
global
efforts
including
e.g.
funding
from
the
EU,
from
the
Rockefeller
Foundation
or
falls
within
the
100
Resilient
Cities
and
UNISDR
efforts,
etc.
Current
issues
faced
by
planning
and
current
natural
and
human
environmental
issues
•It
would
be
great
to
have
this
include
an
extreme
events
focus:
what
kind
of
events
does
the
case
face?
What
have
been
its
historic
events?
(e.g.
what
kind
of
damage,
how
long
did
it
take
for
recovery
and
who
were
the
major
actors
in
rebuilding)
•The
content
of
this
section
should
address
what
are
the
desired
outcomes
for
the
future
development
of
the
city?
Who
is
interested
in
achieving
these
outcomes?
(the
population,
the
government,
private
sector
as
well?)
This
should
help
transition
to
the
next
section
on
what
solutions
were
pursued
•This
should
include
a
description
of
the
kind
of
solutions
that
have
been
pursued
in
the
case
to
make
the
city
more
(or
at
least
work
toward)
resilient
•What
kind
of
“best
practices”
were
employed?
(and
how
they
directly
addressed
the
city’s
challenges
in
trying
to
enhance
resilience)
•Consider
also
the
main
components
of
the
call
as
follows:
oHow
solutions
address
what
is
desirable
and
undesirable
in
building
climate
resilient
societies?
oIn
the
solution:
What
does
a
resilient
society
look
like?
oWhere
slow
transitions
needed
or
rather
rapid
transformations?
oWere
there
any
implications
within
the
case
solution
of
how
governments
can
create
coherent,
forward-looking
and
flexible
policy?
oParticularly,
how
and
does
the
solution
help
the
society:
Support
ecosystem
conservation
Promote
sustainable
use
of
natural
resources
Encourage
sustainable
practices
and
management
systems
Develop
resilient
and
inclusive
communities
While
still
ensuring
economic
growth
And
protecting
livelihoods
from
climatic
extremes?
Learning
points
box
(basic
take
home
points
for
educational
focus)
•Major
challenge(s)
presented
in
the
case
•Tools
or
policy
used
to
address
challenge
•Why
this
was
helpful
in
reaching
desired
outcomeIntroduction
to
California
Cases
This
brief
introduction
chapter
provides
a
quick
background
into
the
planning
and
water
management
system
in
California.
The
purpose
of
this
section
is
primarily
educational
and
helps
the
readers
who
are
not
familiar
with
the
system
to
establish
a
basic
understanding
of
how
water
resources
and
supply
conveyance
typically
work
within
California
and
what
planning
mechanisms
and
in
place
at
the
state
level,
as
well
as
what
authorities
and
responsibilities
are
given
at
the
“regional”
(or
county)
and
municipal
levels.
Case:
San
Diego,
California,
USA
(Tess)
Brief
introduction
to
case
•Explain
in
brief
where
water
comes
from
(critical
in
relation
to
water
security
–
focus
on
Sacramento/San
Jaoquin
Delta
and
the
California
Aquaduct/State
Water
Project)
[Image:
Delta
water
and
start
of
California
Aquaduct
–
insert
from
tour
taken
in
February]
•Current
water
resources
supply,
and
current
water
distribution
system
•How
resilience
is
used
in
water
resources
and
system
planning
•Who
are
the
key
players
•What
is
meant
with
“climate
resilience”
–
what
factors
does
this
appear
to
entail
(see
also
Climate
Action
Plan
text)
–
what
is
desirable
/
not
desirable
Current
issues
faced
by
planning
and
current
natural
and
human
environmental
issues
•Need
for
diversification
of
urban
water
portfolio
•Potential
future
cut-off
from
Metropolitan
Water
District
(MWD)
imported
water
source
•Compounding
factors:
population
increase
and
urban
expansion
(only
4%
undeveloped
land)
•Sea
level
rise
and
saline
intrusion
•Include
past
studies
(Equinox
Report)
[Image:
coastal
protection
measures
in
La
Jolla
community]
Solutions
pursued
(practical
solutions
focus)
•
Pure
Water
San
Diego
(brief
explanation
of
role
in
diversification
process)
[Image:
Pure
Water
facilities
in
San
Diego,
CA
–
insert
from
tour
taken
last
year]
•Stormwater
capture
projects
•Conservation
strategies
(past
success
in
this
and
future
pursuits)
Learning
points
box
(basic
take
home
points
for
educational
focus)
•To
be
completed
with
table
including
major
challenges,
brief
detail
of
measures,
and
how
this
has
been
helpful
to
the
City
of
San
Diego
(current
status)
Case:
San
Francisco,
California,
USA
(Tess)
Brief
introduction
to
case
•Explain
in
brief
where
water
comes
from
(critical
in
relation
to
water
security
–
focus
on
Hetch
Hetchy
source)
•Brief
explanation
of
groundwater
situation
and
planning
environment
•How
resilience
is
used
in
water
resources
and
system
planning
•Who
are
the
key
players
•What
is
meant
with
“climate
resilience”
–
what
factors
does
this
appear
to
entail
(see
also
Climate
Action
Plan
text)
–
what
is
desirable
/
not
desirable
Current
issues
faced
by
planning
and
current
natural
and
human
environmental
issues
•Need
for
diversification
of
urban
water
portfolio
•Challenges
of
a
combined
system
Solutions
pursued
(practical
solutions
focus)
•
Living
Machine
and
PureWaterSF
at
the
San
Francisco
Public
Utilities
Commission
(SFPUC)
[Image:
pictures
of
Living
Machine
wetland
cells
and
PureWaterSF
system
from
visit
to
SFPUC]
Learning
points
box
(basic
take
home
points
for
educational
focus)
•To
be
completed
with
table
including
major
challenges,
brief
detail
of
measures,
and
how
this
has
been
helpful
to
the
City
of
San
Francisco
(current
status)
Introduction
to
German
Cases
Similar
to
the
previous
case
introduction
chapter,
this
educational
introductory
chapter
provides
a
brief
overview
of
the
water
planning
and
management
system
in
Germany.
The
contents
of
this
introduction
target
how
this
is
structured
from
the
national
to
regional
and
then
to
local
system
and
who
the
(general)
responsible
actors
are.
This
includes
a
short
descriptions
of
the
distribution
of
powers
between
the
different
levels
for
planning
in
an
urban
setting
and
particularly
for
the
management
of
water
resources
and
extreme
events.
Case:
Solingen,
Germany
(Kathrin)
Brief
introduction
to
case
•Solingen
is
a
city
dealing
with
flash
flooding
and
heavy
rainfall
events.
•The
city
itself
has
been
quite
active
in
regard
to
flash
flood
protection
•City
drainage
services
take
the
lead
in
implementation
of
flood
protection
measures
•Brief
explanation
of
planning
process
in
Solingen
(reference
also
that
in
Germany
this
process
will
be
the
same
for
the
City
of
Remscheid)
•How
resilience
is
used
in
water
resources
and
system
planning
•Who
are
the
key
players
•What
is
meant
with
“climate
resilience”
–
what
factors
does
this
appear
to
entail
(see
also
Climate
Action
Plan
text)
–
what
is
desirable
/
not
desirable
[Image:
pictures
from
past
Solingen
flash
flood]
Current
issues
faced
by
planning
and
current
natural
and
human
environmental
issues
•Flash
flooding
and
heavy
precipitation
make
for
a
need
to
divert
water
quickly
and
minimize
potential
damage
within
short
temporal
scale•Insert
examples
from
city
drainage
service
(include
image
where
possible
of
flood
mitigation
measure)
Solutions
pursued
(practical
solutions
focus)
•
Need
to
insert
mitigation
measure
examples
along
with
Solingen’s
overall
flood
management
and
planning
strategy
Learning
points
box
(basic
take
home
points
for
educational
focus)
•To
be
completed
with
table
including
major
challenges,
brief
detail
of
tool,
and
how
this
has
been
helpful
to
the
City
of
Solingen
(current
status)
Case:
Remscheid,
Germany
(Kathrin)
Brief
introduction
to
case
•The
City
of
Remscheid
deals
with
extreme
weather,
especially
flooding
that
severely
affects
urban
areas.
•How
resilience
is
used
in
water
resources
and
system
planning
•Who
are
the
key
players
•What
is
meant
with
“climate
resilience”
–
what
factors
does
this
appear
to
entail
(see
also
Climate
Action
Plan
text)
–
what
is
desirable
/
not
desirable
•The
project
“BESTKLIMA”
was
selected
to
address
these
issues
[Image:
flooding
in
Remscheid
urban
center]
Current
issues
faced
by
planning
and
current
natural
and
human
environmental
issues
•The
city
needed
a
tool
or
system
to
enable
them
to
map
flooding
issues
in
a
transparent
manner,
while
taking
into
account
environmental
as
well
as
human
factors
[Insert
table:
list
of
current
issues,
both
human
and
natural,
taken
into
account]
Solutions
pursued
(practical
solutions
focus)
•Water
flow
paths
were
created
and
mapped
for
flow
direction
model
for
the
City
of
Remscheid.
•The
city
decided
to
put
these
maps
online,
so
that
inhabitants
or
interested
locals
can
check
online,
whether
their
house
is
in
a
"critical"
zone:
http://geoportal.remscheid.de/mapbender3/application/vorsorgekarte_starkregen
•Only
very
few
cities
put
these
maps
online
(if
they
are
available
at
all),
because
usually
house
or
plot
owners
fear
that
their
property
might
lose
its
value
once
everyone
can
find
out
that
it
lies
in
a
critical
zone
(and
that
they
will
blame
the
city
for
this
loss
of
value).
But
Remscheid
decided
that
it's
the
city's
duty
to
inform
citizens
about
the
dangers
they
might
face
and
that
they
have
to
pass
the
information
they
have
onwards
to
the
public.
[Image:
view
of
map
example
showing
flow
paths
from
model]
Learning
points
box
(basic
take
home
points
for
educational
focus)
•To
be
completed
with
table
including
major
challenges,
brief
detail
of
tool,
and
how
this
has
been
helpful
to
the
City
of
Remscheid
(current
status)
Summary
of
key
points
and
cross-cutting
themes
•Focus
on
practical
implications
for
moving
forward
and
what
these
points
mean
for
on
the
ground
building
of
resilience,
particularly
addressing
the
calls
main
foci:
oDesirable/Undesirable:
What
is
desirable
and
undesirable
in
building
climate
resilient
societies
(commonalities
and
differences
within
above
in-practice
examples)
oResilience
visual:
What
does
a
resilient
society
look
like
(insert
diagram
schematic
with
key
desirable
and
undesirable
components)
oCatalysts/Inhibitors
to
resilient
transition:
Reflection
on
the
“speed”
of
resilient
transitions
in
these
cases
–
what
sparks
a
jump
forward,
what
factors
have
created
a
lag
in
progress
(e.g.
revamping
public
transparency
approach
in
Germany
case,
reduction
in
conservation
efforts
in
a
short
“post-drought”
period
in
the
CA
cases)
oPolicy:
Progress
in
policy
(brief
summary
from
cases),
focusing
on
how
recent
policy
in
these
cases
works
toward
coherent,
forward-looking
and
flexible
policy
(and
where
this
is
still
lacking).
Addresses
also
which
of
the
follow
boxes
are
being
addressed
by
these
policies:
Support
ecosystem
conservation
Promote
sustainable
use
of
natural
resources
Encourage
sustainable
practices
and
management
systems
Develop
resilient
and
inclusive
communities
While
still
ensuring
economic
growth
And
protecting
livelihoods
from
climatic
extremes
Summary
of
key
points
and
cross-cutting
themes
•Revisit
of
key
points
for
more
“global”
summary,
addressing
components
of
good
practice
(e.g.
transparent
planning
practices,
and
good
data
management
for
all
four,
diversification
of
supply
resources
unique
to
CA
cases,
mapping
technology
and
methods
unique
to
German
cases)
•[insert
bullet
point
text
box
of
both
“lessons
learned”
and
“BKM”
type
practices,
identifying
unique
and
cross-cutting
factors]
•Connect
to
greater
dialogue
of
current
global
efforts
including
Resilient
Cities,
Sendai,
and
SDGs.
Not
a
deep
dive,
but
a
reflection
on
how
these
in-practice,
local
societies
demonstrate
patters
of
what
are
common
issues
within
the
global
dialogue.
Notă biografică
Teresa
Sprague
is
a
water
resources
planner
at
Woodard
&
Curran
Inc.
in
San
Francisco,
California.
After
her
M.Sc.
at
the
University
of
Oxford,
UK
she
was
awarded
a
Marie
Skłodowska-Curie
Actions
Research
Fellowship
from
the
European
Union
and
completed
her
PhD
in
water
risk
governance
at
the
Technical
University
of
Dortmund,
Germany.
Kathrin
Prenger-Berninghoff
is
a
lecturer
and
scientific
staff
of
Urban
and
Regional
Planning
at
RWTH
Aachen
University,
Germany.
She
is
a
recipient
of
a
Marie
Skłodowska-Curie
Actions
Research
Fellowship
from
the
European
Union
and
completed
her
PhD
in
spatial
planning
at
the
Technical
University
of
Dortmund,
Germany.
Caracteristici
Explores
4
case
studies
for
resilient
cities
Discusses
the
continued
efforts
and
current
status
of
disaster
management
relating
to
water
Examines
how
German
and
US
approaches
to
resilience
could
be
applied
to
the
developing
world