Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
Corporations and the Privilege against Self-Incrimination de Dr Stijn Lamberigts

Corporations and the Privilege against Self-Incrimination: Hart Studies in European Criminal Law

Autor Dr Stijn Lamberigts
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 3 iul 2024
This book asks whether the well-established privilege against self-incrimination applies to corporations, whether it should, and if so, to what extent. Those questions have an increasingly important EU criminal law dimension. To answer them, this study draws on comparative insights from Belgium, England and Wales, and the US; as well as case law of the ECtHR and EU Law. It covers the established CJEU case law in competition cases, the recent CJEU ruling in DB v Consob and addresses Directive (EU) 2016/343. It will appeal to scholars of EU criminal law, but also to white-collar and competition practitioners.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 29678 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 3 iul 2024 29678 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 50743 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 28 dec 2022 50743 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Hart Studies in European Criminal Law

Preț: 29678 lei

Preț vechi: 36577 lei
-19% Nou

Puncte Express: 445
Preț estimativ în valută:
5681€ • 6109$ • 4734£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 20 decembrie 24 - 03 ianuarie 25

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781509953356
ISBN-10: 1509953353
Pagini: 304
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 25 mm
Greutate: 0.43 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Seria Hart Studies in European Criminal Law

Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

Looks at the increasingly important question of the extent to which the privilege against self-incrimination applies to corporations

Notă biografică

Stijn Lamberigts is an attorney at Eubelius and member of the Brussels Bar, Belgium.

Cuprins

1. Introduction I. Corporate Offenders and Procedural Safeguards II. Corporations, Punitive Cases and the Privilege against Self-Incrimination III. Structure and Methodology 2. The Roots and Historical Rationale(s) of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination I. Nemo Tenetur Prodere Seipsum II. The Oath ex Officio III. Torture IV. Consolidation of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination V. The Missing Piece of the Puzzle? VI. Applying the Historical Rationales to Corporations 3. How Different Are Corporations for the Purpose of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination? I. Corporate Personhood II. (Im)possibility of Exerting Physical or Psychological Pressure on Corporations III. Importance of Documentary Evidence IV. Impossibility of Exercising the Privilege against Self-Incrimination Independently V. Comparable Categories VI. Legitimate Aim VII. Objective Criterion of DistinctionVIII. Suitability and Necessity IX. Proportionality Sensu Stricto 4. Contemporary Rationales of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination I. Protection from Cruel Choices II. The Protection of the Innocent III. The Privilege against Self-Incrimination and the Presumption of Innocence IV. Privacy Protection 5. Self-Incrimination 6. Compulsion I. Compulsion by Public Authorities II. Permitted Compulsion III. Adverse InferencesIV. Private Compulsion 7. The Privilege against Self-Incrimination and Different Types of Evidence I. Oral Statements II. Documentary EvidenceIII. Encrypted Evidence 8. The Applicability of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination Ratione Temporis 9. Waiver of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination 10. Corporations and the Privilege against Self-Incrimination I. (Supra)national Models of Corporate Criminal Liability II. Corporations and the Privilege against Self-Incrimination III. Linking Models of Corporate Criminal Liability to the (Un)availability of a Corporate Privilege against Self-Incrimination IV. The Cooperating Corporation 11. A Proposal for a Balanced Corporate Privilege against Self-Incrimination I. Different Models of a Corporate Privilege against Self-Incrimination II. A Proposal for a Balanced Corporate Privilege against Self-Incrimination 12. Overall Conclusion