Critical Race Judgments: Rewritten U.S. Court Opinions on Race and the Law
Editat de Bennett Capers, Devon W. Carbado, R. A. Lenhardt, Angela Onwuachi-Willigen Limba Engleză Paperback – 20 apr 2022
| Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
|---|---|---|
| Paperback (1) | 416.01 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Cambridge University Press – 20 apr 2022 | 416.01 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Hardback (1) | 698.70 lei 6-8 săpt. | +79.16 lei 4-10 zile |
| Cambridge University Press – 20 apr 2022 | 698.70 lei 6-8 săpt. | +79.16 lei 4-10 zile |
Preț: 416.01 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 624
Preț estimativ în valută:
79.62€ • 82.99$ • 66.28£
79.62€ • 82.99$ • 66.28£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 06-20 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781316616451
ISBN-10: 1316616452
Pagini: 600
Dimensiuni: 152 x 228 x 36 mm
Greutate: 0.95 kg
Ediția:Nouă
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 1316616452
Pagini: 600
Dimensiuni: 152 x 228 x 36 mm
Greutate: 0.95 kg
Ediția:Nouă
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Cuprins
Introduction: Brown v. Board of education Derrick Bell; Part I. Membership and Inclusion: Arizona v. United States Kevin Johnson; Chae Chan Ping v. United States Rose Cuizon Villazor; Plessy v. Ferguson Trina Jones; Korematsu v. United States Robert Chang; The Slaughter-House cases Francisco Valdez; Terry v. Ohio Paul Butler; Rogers v. American airlines Wendy Greene; Part II. Participation and Access: Shaw v. Reno Guy Charles and has Luis Fuentes-Rohwer; Rice v. Cayetano Addie Rolnick; Milliken v. Bradley Michelle Adams; Gong Lum v. Rice Reginald Oh; Regents of the university of california v. Bakke Luke Charles Harris; Parents involved v. seattle school district no. 1 Charles Lawrence; Part III. Property and Space: Dred Scott v. Sandford Cheryl Harris; Virginia v. Black Mari Matsuda; Palmer v. Thompson Elise Boddie; Griggs v. Duke Power Co. Angela Onwuachi-Willig and David Simson; Washington v. Davis Kimberlé Crewnshaw; Katz v. United States Bennett Capers; Illinois v. Wardlow L. Song Richardson; Part IV. Intimate choice and autonomy: Loving v. Virginia Peggy Cooper Davis; Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl Matthew Fletcher; Reno v. Flores Jennifer Chacón; Lawrence v. Texas Russell Robinson; Moore v. City of East Cleveland Robin Lenhardt; Buck v. Bell Dorothy Roberts; Roe v. Wade Melissa Murray; Part V. Justice: United States v. Cruikshank Pratheepan Gulasekaram; McCleskey v. Kemp Mario Barnes; Whren v. United States Devon Carbado and Jonathan Feingold; Richardson v. Ramirez Janai Nelson; Bean v. Southwestern waste management corp Sheila Foster; Barlow v. Collins Angela P. Harris; Muller v. Oregon Khiara Bridges; Williams v. Walker-Thomas furniture Co. Emily Hough; San Antonio Independent school district v. Rodriguez Rachel Moran.
Recenzii
'What a brilliant idea to invite critical race theorists to reimagine some of the most important and impactful legal cases in our history. The provocative collection shows what might have been if justices and judges employed an equitable lens to cases. It also shows what can still be: a fairer, egalitarian world.' Ibram X. Kendi, author of Stamped from the Beginning and How to Be an Antiracist
'What if the U.S. Supreme Court treated racial inequalities as diagnoses of where American institutions need change rather than as natural, immutable, and fair? At this contentious time, pitting racial reckoning against political backlash—when cynics hijack the phrase 'critical race theory' to terrorize teachers from sharing America's actual history even as corporations embrace 'diversity, equity, and inclusion'—this collection of rigorous chapters accepts constraints of legal reasoning while demonstrating how court decisions could have centered rather than obscured the actual experiences of African Americans, American Indians, Native Hawaiians, Mexican-Americans, and immigrants. Legal treatments of voting, schooling, employment, and policing could all have been different. With telling details across American law and history, this book invigorates future possibilities of justice for all families, communities, and human beings.' Martha Minow, author of In Brown's Wake: Legacies of America's Constitutional Landmark, 300th Anniversary University Professor, Harvard University
'American law is one of the battlegrounds on which the struggle for racial justice has been fought, at times serving as a barrier to justice and at other times pointing the way. The thought-provoking essays in this timely book force us to think about how we got where we are, and to imagine how these seminal decisions could have brought us to an altered, more just present.' Deborah N. Archer, President, ACLU, and Professor of Clinical Law and Co-Faculty Director, Center on Race, Law, and Inequality, NYU Law School
'Critical Race Judgments could not come at more important moment. Each offering from the brilliant array of legal scholars assembled for this extraordinary project compels us to imagine the America that could have been, had the Supreme Court's jurisprudence been informed by the necessary truths that critical race theory engages. Ironically this makes Critical Race Judgments both devastating and inspiring - clearly exposing the ruinous jurisprudential path that has led us away from fulfilling the promise of the Civil War Amendments, and offering a potential path towards a jurisprudence that could still save our fragile republic.' Sherrilyn Ifill, NAACP Legal Defense Fund President and Co-Director
'What if the U.S. Supreme Court treated racial inequalities as diagnoses of where American institutions need change rather than as natural, immutable, and fair? At this contentious time, pitting racial reckoning against political backlash—when cynics hijack the phrase 'critical race theory' to terrorize teachers from sharing America's actual history even as corporations embrace 'diversity, equity, and inclusion'—this collection of rigorous chapters accepts constraints of legal reasoning while demonstrating how court decisions could have centered rather than obscured the actual experiences of African Americans, American Indians, Native Hawaiians, Mexican-Americans, and immigrants. Legal treatments of voting, schooling, employment, and policing could all have been different. With telling details across American law and history, this book invigorates future possibilities of justice for all families, communities, and human beings.' Martha Minow, author of In Brown's Wake: Legacies of America's Constitutional Landmark, 300th Anniversary University Professor, Harvard University
'American law is one of the battlegrounds on which the struggle for racial justice has been fought, at times serving as a barrier to justice and at other times pointing the way. The thought-provoking essays in this timely book force us to think about how we got where we are, and to imagine how these seminal decisions could have brought us to an altered, more just present.' Deborah N. Archer, President, ACLU, and Professor of Clinical Law and Co-Faculty Director, Center on Race, Law, and Inequality, NYU Law School
'Critical Race Judgments could not come at more important moment. Each offering from the brilliant array of legal scholars assembled for this extraordinary project compels us to imagine the America that could have been, had the Supreme Court's jurisprudence been informed by the necessary truths that critical race theory engages. Ironically this makes Critical Race Judgments both devastating and inspiring - clearly exposing the ruinous jurisprudential path that has led us away from fulfilling the promise of the Civil War Amendments, and offering a potential path towards a jurisprudence that could still save our fragile republic.' Sherrilyn Ifill, NAACP Legal Defense Fund President and Co-Director
Descriere
Using CRT, this book demonstrates how law can make Black lives, and the lives of other racially marginalized groups, matter.