Daydream Believers: How a Few Grand Ideas Wrecked American Power
Autor Fred Kaplanen Limba Engleză Hardback – 13 mar 2008
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 86.86 lei 22-36 zile | |
Wiley – 18 dec 2008 | 86.86 lei 22-36 zile | |
Hardback (1) | 139.56 lei 22-36 zile | |
Wiley (TP) – 13 mar 2008 | 139.56 lei 22-36 zile |
Preț: 139.56 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 209
Preț estimativ în valută:
26.71€ • 27.84$ • 22.24£
26.71€ • 27.84$ • 22.24£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 16-30 decembrie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780470121184
ISBN-10: 0470121181
Pagini: 246
Dimensiuni: 164 x 233 x 25 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Editura: Wiley (TP)
Colecția John Wiley &Sons
Locul publicării:Hoboken, United States
ISBN-10: 0470121181
Pagini: 246
Dimensiuni: 164 x 233 x 25 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Editura: Wiley (TP)
Colecția John Wiley &Sons
Locul publicării:Hoboken, United States
Public țintă
The push to do something about the Iranian nuclear program is getting bigger every day. And the primary voices are all exactly the sort of daydreamers this book is about––still making the same mistakes.Descriere
America′s power is in decline, its foreign policy adrift, its allies alienated, its soldiers trapped in a war that even generals regard as unwinnable. What has happened these past eight years is well known. Why it happened continues to puzzle. In Daydream Believers, celebrated Slate columnist Fred Kaplan combines in–depth reporting and razor–sharp analysis to explain just how George W. Bush and his aides got so far off track and why much of the nation followed. Kaplan demonstrates that their disasters stemmed not from mere incompetence but from two grave misconceptions. First, they believed that the world changed after 9/11, when it didn′t. The nature of power, warfare, and politics among nations remained the same, no matter how deeply they wanted to break free from the real world′s constraints. Second, they thought that America emerged from its Cold War victory stronger than before, when in fact it was weaker. The disappearance of the Soviet Union brought freedom to much of the globe. But by the same token, the shattering of their common enemy gave many of America′s allies leave to go their own way and pursue their own interests, without regard for what Washington desired.
For eight years, Kaplan reminds us, the White House and many of the nation′s podiums and opinion pages rang out with appealing but deluded claims: that we live in a time like no other and that, therefore, the lessons of history no longer apply; that new technology has transformed warfare; that the world′s peoples will be set free, if only America topples their dictators; and that those who dispute such promises do so for partisan reasons. They thought they were visionaries, but they only had visions. And they believed in their daydreams.
Kaplan traces the genesis and evolution of these ideas from the era of Nixon through Reagan to the present day and reveals how they have been either twisted through the years or rebutted as illusions at every step.
Packed with stunning anecdotes, hidden history, and a level of insight only Fred Kaplan can bring to issues of national security, Daydream Believers tells a story whose understanding is central to getting America back on track and to finding leaders who can improve the world, and America′s position in it, by seeing the world as it really is.
For eight years, Kaplan reminds us, the White House and many of the nation′s podiums and opinion pages rang out with appealing but deluded claims: that we live in a time like no other and that, therefore, the lessons of history no longer apply; that new technology has transformed warfare; that the world′s peoples will be set free, if only America topples their dictators; and that those who dispute such promises do so for partisan reasons. They thought they were visionaries, but they only had visions. And they believed in their daydreams.
Kaplan traces the genesis and evolution of these ideas from the era of Nixon through Reagan to the present day and reveals how they have been either twisted through the years or rebutted as illusions at every step.
Packed with stunning anecdotes, hidden history, and a level of insight only Fred Kaplan can bring to issues of national security, Daydream Believers tells a story whose understanding is central to getting America back on track and to finding leaders who can improve the world, and America′s position in it, by seeing the world as it really is.
Textul de pe ultima copertă
America′s power is in decline, its foreign policy adrift, its allies alienated, its soldiers trapped in a war that even generals regard as unwinnable. What has happened these past eight years is well known. Why it happened continues to puzzle. In Daydream Believers, celebrated Slate columnist Fred Kaplan combines in–depth reporting and razor–sharp analysis to explain just how George W. Bush and his aides got so far off track and why much of the nation followed. Kaplan demonstrates that their disasters stemmed not from mere incompetence but from two grave misconceptions. First, they believed that the world changed after 9/11, when it didn′t. The nature of power, warfare, and politics among nations remained the same, no matter how deeply they wanted to break free from the real world′s constraints. Second, they thought that America emerged from its Cold War victory stronger than before, when in fact it was weaker. The disappearance of the Soviet Union brought freedom to much of the globe. But by the same token, the shattering of their common enemy gave many of America′s allies leave to go their own way and pursue their own interests, without regard for what Washington desired.
For eight years, Kaplan reminds us, the White House and many of the nation′s podiums and opinion pages rang out with appealing but deluded claims: that we live in a time like no other and that, therefore, the lessons of history no longer apply; that new technology has transformed warfare; that the world′s peoples will be set free, if only America topples their dictators; and that those who dispute such promises do so for partisan reasons. They thought they were visionaries, but they only had visions. And they believed in their daydreams.
Kaplan traces the genesis and evolution of these ideas from the era of Nixon through Reagan to the present day and reveals how they have been either twisted through the years or rebutted as illusions at every step.
Packed with stunning anecdotes, hidden history, and a level of insight only Fred Kaplan can bring to issues of national security, Daydream Believers tells a story whose understanding is central to getting America back on track and to finding leaders who can improve the world, and America′s position in it, by seeing the world as it really is.
For eight years, Kaplan reminds us, the White House and many of the nation′s podiums and opinion pages rang out with appealing but deluded claims: that we live in a time like no other and that, therefore, the lessons of history no longer apply; that new technology has transformed warfare; that the world′s peoples will be set free, if only America topples their dictators; and that those who dispute such promises do so for partisan reasons. They thought they were visionaries, but they only had visions. And they believed in their daydreams.
Kaplan traces the genesis and evolution of these ideas from the era of Nixon through Reagan to the present day and reveals how they have been either twisted through the years or rebutted as illusions at every step.
Packed with stunning anecdotes, hidden history, and a level of insight only Fred Kaplan can bring to issues of national security, Daydream Believers tells a story whose understanding is central to getting America back on track and to finding leaders who can improve the world, and America′s position in it, by seeing the world as it really is.
Cuprins
Introduction. 1 The Mirage of Instant Victory.
2 The Fog of Moral Clarity.
3 Chasing Silver Bullets.
4 Breaking the World Anew.
5 The Dreams Dissolve into Nightmares.
6 Waking Up to Reality.
Acknowledgments.
Notes.
Bibliography.
Index.
2 The Fog of Moral Clarity.
3 Chasing Silver Bullets.
4 Breaking the World Anew.
5 The Dreams Dissolve into Nightmares.
6 Waking Up to Reality.
Acknowledgments.
Notes.
Bibliography.
Index.
Recenzii
Regular Swampland readers know how much I respect the Pentagon analysis filed by Fred Kaplan of Slate. Kaplan′s new book Daydream Believers is excellent and devastating, not just on the Iraq war, but also on the Bush Administration′s fantastic devotion to anti–missile defense and its first term refusal to negotiate with the North Koreans. Kaplan is also terrific on the depredations of former Rumsfeld assistant Douglas Feith, who also has a new, rather obese book out trying to justify his lethal foolishness. I′d love to see Kaplan review it somewhere––a Cliff′s Notes version of Feith′s greatest whoppers would be a small, but essential, public service. But go, please, and buy Kaplan′s book. His great work deserves attention and reward.
Patrick Cockburn′s Iraq obsession puts my tiny 5–year jones to shame. He′s been out there for two decades and really knows the place and the players, which makes his new biography of Muqtada Sadr essential reading, especially now. I haven′t finished it yet––last few chapters to go––but it seems eminently fair and very well–informed so far and I decided to include here and now because of the events on the ground in Mesopotamia.
Speaking of which, I agree with Kevin Drum′s assessment of today′s New York Times piece about the mysterious Mr. Sadr...especially the part where Kevin confesses that he′s not quite sure what′s going on. My suspicion is that Sadr sees more hope in the October elections than in a military confrontation with the U.S. and Badr Corps right now. Also fascinating that the Iran seems, for the moment, to be taking sides with its more tradition partner––the Hakim Shi′ite faction––and against the militias that Crocker and Petraeus, Bush and McCain were so convinced were Iran′s cat′s paw in Iraq. It′s always good to remember that while the Sadr family stayed in Iraq during Saddam′s reign, the Hakims lived in Iran and their militia––the Badr Corps, now melted into the Iraqi Army, were organized and served as part of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps.
It′s a classic policy conundrum: Sadr is more anti–American, but Hakim is more pro–Iranian. Short–term Sadr is a real problem––especially those Sadrist elements that are lobbing mortars into the Green Zone and setting bombs to kill American troops. Long term, though, the Hakim faction may be crucial in the further empowerment of Iran in the region. (Time.com, April 20, 2008) "Author Fred Kaplan offers an insightful analysis of what he sees as the unrealistic hopes at the root of President George W. Bush′s problematic foreign policy in the Mideast" [and calls his arguments] "strong." (Boston Globe, April 12, 2008)
"[Kaplan] sheds new light on the important part played by certain advisers within the Bush White House, while explicating several pivotal and perplexing matters concerning the administration s decision–making process.... illuminating... incisive." (The New York Times, March 18, 2008)
"A lively and entertaining –– if occasionally horrifying –– read, it offers a cautionary tale for any administration and for the men and women who hope to serve in one...master archaeologist who can see through the shards and stones of a dig to reconstruct the culture of the city below." (Washington Post, March 16, 2008)
America s leaders have gone from hubris to waking fantasy, according to this caustic critique of the Bush administration s foreign policy. Kaplan (The Wizards of Armageddon) argues that the Cold War s end and 9/11 persuaded President Bush and his advisers to unilaterally impose America s political will on the world, while remaining blind to the military and diplomatic fiascoes that followed. Rumsfeld s "Revolution in Military Affairs," a doctrine touting supposedly omnipotent mobile forces and high–tech smart weapons, convinced Pentagon officials that Iraq could be pacified without a large force or a reconstruction plan. Bush abandoned Clinton s diplomatic rapprochement with North Korea, then stood by as Kim Jong–Il built nuclear weapons. And imbued with a "mix of neo–conservatism and evangelism" that was peddled most flamboyantly by Israeli ideologue Natan Sharansky, Bush backed clumsy pro democracy initiatives that backfired by bringing anti–American and sectarian groups to power in the Middle East. Eschewing Kaplan s favored approach of fostering international security through alliances and consensus building, Bush assumed that "by virtue of American power, saying something was tantamount to making it so." The particulars of Kaplan s indictment aren t new, but his detailed, illuminating (if occasionally disjointed) accounts of the evolution of the Bush administration s strategic doctrines add up to a cogent brief for soft realism over truculent idealism. (Feb.) (Publishers Weekly, November 12, 2007)
"...detailed, illuminating accounts." (Publishers Weekly, November 12, 2007) The tone throughout is cool and detached, but his overall conclusions are anything but. Sunday Business Post (Dublin) Sunday 11 May 2008
Patrick Cockburn′s Iraq obsession puts my tiny 5–year jones to shame. He′s been out there for two decades and really knows the place and the players, which makes his new biography of Muqtada Sadr essential reading, especially now. I haven′t finished it yet––last few chapters to go––but it seems eminently fair and very well–informed so far and I decided to include here and now because of the events on the ground in Mesopotamia.
Speaking of which, I agree with Kevin Drum′s assessment of today′s New York Times piece about the mysterious Mr. Sadr...especially the part where Kevin confesses that he′s not quite sure what′s going on. My suspicion is that Sadr sees more hope in the October elections than in a military confrontation with the U.S. and Badr Corps right now. Also fascinating that the Iran seems, for the moment, to be taking sides with its more tradition partner––the Hakim Shi′ite faction––and against the militias that Crocker and Petraeus, Bush and McCain were so convinced were Iran′s cat′s paw in Iraq. It′s always good to remember that while the Sadr family stayed in Iraq during Saddam′s reign, the Hakims lived in Iran and their militia––the Badr Corps, now melted into the Iraqi Army, were organized and served as part of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps.
It′s a classic policy conundrum: Sadr is more anti–American, but Hakim is more pro–Iranian. Short–term Sadr is a real problem––especially those Sadrist elements that are lobbing mortars into the Green Zone and setting bombs to kill American troops. Long term, though, the Hakim faction may be crucial in the further empowerment of Iran in the region. (Time.com, April 20, 2008) "Author Fred Kaplan offers an insightful analysis of what he sees as the unrealistic hopes at the root of President George W. Bush′s problematic foreign policy in the Mideast" [and calls his arguments] "strong." (Boston Globe, April 12, 2008)
"[Kaplan] sheds new light on the important part played by certain advisers within the Bush White House, while explicating several pivotal and perplexing matters concerning the administration s decision–making process.... illuminating... incisive." (The New York Times, March 18, 2008)
"A lively and entertaining –– if occasionally horrifying –– read, it offers a cautionary tale for any administration and for the men and women who hope to serve in one...master archaeologist who can see through the shards and stones of a dig to reconstruct the culture of the city below." (Washington Post, March 16, 2008)
America s leaders have gone from hubris to waking fantasy, according to this caustic critique of the Bush administration s foreign policy. Kaplan (The Wizards of Armageddon) argues that the Cold War s end and 9/11 persuaded President Bush and his advisers to unilaterally impose America s political will on the world, while remaining blind to the military and diplomatic fiascoes that followed. Rumsfeld s "Revolution in Military Affairs," a doctrine touting supposedly omnipotent mobile forces and high–tech smart weapons, convinced Pentagon officials that Iraq could be pacified without a large force or a reconstruction plan. Bush abandoned Clinton s diplomatic rapprochement with North Korea, then stood by as Kim Jong–Il built nuclear weapons. And imbued with a "mix of neo–conservatism and evangelism" that was peddled most flamboyantly by Israeli ideologue Natan Sharansky, Bush backed clumsy pro democracy initiatives that backfired by bringing anti–American and sectarian groups to power in the Middle East. Eschewing Kaplan s favored approach of fostering international security through alliances and consensus building, Bush assumed that "by virtue of American power, saying something was tantamount to making it so." The particulars of Kaplan s indictment aren t new, but his detailed, illuminating (if occasionally disjointed) accounts of the evolution of the Bush administration s strategic doctrines add up to a cogent brief for soft realism over truculent idealism. (Feb.) (Publishers Weekly, November 12, 2007)
"...detailed, illuminating accounts." (Publishers Weekly, November 12, 2007) The tone throughout is cool and detached, but his overall conclusions are anything but. Sunday Business Post (Dublin) Sunday 11 May 2008
Notă biografică
Fred Kaplan writes the "War Stories" column in Slate. The author of the classic book The Wizards of Armageddon, he has also written for the New York Times, the New Yorker, the Washington Post, the Atlantic Monthly, and other publications. He earned a Ph.D. from MIT, worked as a foreign policy aide on Capitol Hill, and spent decades as a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter in Washington and Moscow. He lives in Brooklyn with his wife, NPR journalist Brooke Gladstone.