Edmund Burke and the Invention of Modern Conservatism, 1830-1914: An Intellectual History: Oxford Historical Monographs
Autor Emily Jonesen Limba Engleză Hardback – 5 apr 2017
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 240.61 lei 31-37 zile | |
OUP OXFORD – 6 feb 2019 | 240.61 lei 31-37 zile | |
Hardback (1) | 622.70 lei 31-37 zile | |
OUP OXFORD – 5 apr 2017 | 622.70 lei 31-37 zile |
Din seria Oxford Historical Monographs
- 27% Preț: 536.88 lei
- 23% Preț: 910.29 lei
- 27% Preț: 496.59 lei
- 27% Preț: 559.30 lei
- 14% Preț: 499.81 lei
- 27% Preț: 496.59 lei
- 19% Preț: 628.25 lei
- 19% Preț: 655.05 lei
- 16% Preț: 243.34 lei
- 19% Preț: 556.86 lei
- 18% Preț: 495.47 lei
- 21% Preț: 566.33 lei
- 24% Preț: 500.91 lei
- 8% Preț: 308.58 lei
- 19% Preț: 625.99 lei
- 19% Preț: 625.21 lei
- 27% Preț: 601.48 lei
- 27% Preț: 497.41 lei
- 9% Preț: 529.44 lei
- 9% Preț: 534.72 lei
- 19% Preț: 627.49 lei
- 15% Preț: 494.74 lei
- 24% Preț: 533.81 lei
- 23% Preț: 884.80 lei
- 31% Preț: 1148.14 lei
- 48% Preț: 611.87 lei
- 32% Preț: 1189.38 lei
- 32% Preț: 1423.37 lei
- 28% Preț: 326.82 lei
- 31% Preț: 571.08 lei
- 31% Preț: 1061.78 lei
- 32% Preț: 998.88 lei
- 28% Preț: 329.32 lei
- 31% Preț: 1030.93 lei
- 31% Preț: 1146.69 lei
- 32% Preț: 1247.42 lei
- 31% Preț: 1000.98 lei
- 31% Preț: 857.80 lei
- 31% Preț: 1155.36 lei
- 31% Preț: 942.23 lei
- 31% Preț: 957.40 lei
- 31% Preț: 1118.85 lei
- 28% Preț: 467.99 lei
- 24% Preț: 330.14 lei
- 24% Preț: 373.08 lei
- 31% Preț: 1043.75 lei
- 31% Preț: 1031.26 lei
- 48% Preț: 753.52 lei
- 31% Preț: 1076.38 lei
- 31% Preț: 1148.79 lei
Preț: 622.70 lei
Preț vechi: 807.31 lei
-23% Nou
Puncte Express: 934
Preț estimativ în valută:
119.16€ • 125.33$ • 99.57£
119.16€ • 125.33$ • 99.57£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 28 decembrie 24 - 03 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780198799429
ISBN-10: 019879942X
Pagini: 288
Dimensiuni: 142 x 223 x 23 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Seria Oxford Historical Monographs
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 019879942X
Pagini: 288
Dimensiuni: 142 x 223 x 23 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Seria Oxford Historical Monographs
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Recenzii
This is an impressive book, steeped in the intellectual history of Britain in the 19th century, but touching luminously on wider aspects of political and cultural history in explaining Burke's shifting fortunes. The resourcefulness and perceptiveness of the book strike the reader on every page, as does its feel for the different and often conflicting movements of thought that heightened interest in -- and controversy about -- Burke. It will inform new avenues of inquiry into C/conservatism, both in the period it has brought into focus and in others; also in related research areas. Most of all, this book underlines the nature of C/conservatism as a historical construct, rooted in claims and arguments that mobilise past thinkers in support of particular views rooted firmly in the present.
It remains to be seen how Jones's work will shape the field of Burke studies, but it is difficult to imagine anyone writing about Burke and conservatism as they did before her groundbreaking study. She demonstrates how much more there is to say about even the most well-studied topics if we return to the foundational historical question: 'When?'. Influence - as much as the political traditions it succours - is also an invention: a product of, not something separate from, history. In essence, Jones shows us that claims, assumptions, or denials of influence - of the sort that Burke had and has on conservative traditions - have a history of their own and until we come to terms with this history, we risk not only misinterpreting that influence - i.e. Burke's relationship to conservatism - but asking the wrong questions about it.
When we think of British C/conservatism (both the party-political and the social philosophy) we think of Edmund Burke ... The association between Burke and such ideas has taken on the status of an immemorial truism. But the great value of Emily Jones's perceptive and erudite book is to show that this association was the outcome of a century of writing about Burke that only gradually turned him into a C/conservative master spirit. Hers is a compelling and admirably well-researched study in the construction of a durable political tradition.
rich, satisfyingly complex, rigorously researched, and vigorously written
superb analysis likely to become a classic of 'reception history'
perceptive and erudite a compelling and admirably well-researched study
well-grounded, and consistently interesting
Jones ... show[s] that Burke has much to offer readers grappling with their own situations.
However, if Burke is not the founder of modern conservatism, then when, why, and how was it invented? In particular, how did Burke become so linked with British conservatives? Jones provides a thorough, fascinating treatment of the question, examining how British historians, politicians, and political theorists understood the work, life, and significance of Burke. Most important, she shows that from the 1890s, Burke's corpus was 'de-contextualized' and his principles were 'gradually extracted,' forming an interpretation of 'Burke as C/conservative' and the 'invention' of modern conservatism. Jones's book is an illuminating, timely, important contribution to scholarship ... Highly recommended.
The power of Jones's analysis lies in the skill with which she shows how 'perceived similarities' dominate so much intellectual history and how, consequently, they misinform our understanding of the history of ideologies ... [A] vital contribution
[A] fascinating story
[Edmund Burke is] the subject of an intriguing, surprisingly accessible study by Emily Jones.
[This book] is by no means a traditional history of political thought. It is about public discourse in the broadest sense, basing its analysis on a wide variety of printed sources, from political journalism to philosophical treatises to calendars of evening classes. It offers by turns in-depth analyses of pivotal texts and speeches, and wider sampling from reviews, pamphlets, and Hansard. It deals with a topic of obvious importance in a consistently illuminating fashion, aiming to show how established party doctrines and entrenched assumptions rendered certain readings of Burke's ideas particularly persuasive ... a work of serious scholarship and methodological intent, which opens new doors in the study of political reputations. And at the absolute least, it must force historians to abandon their long-standing reflexive recourse to the adjective "Burkean" in writing on modern British politics.
It remains to be seen how Jones's work will shape the field of Burke studies, but it is difficult to imagine anyone writing about Burke and conservatism as they did before her groundbreaking study. She demonstrates how much more there is to say about even the most well-studied topics if we return to the foundational historical question: 'When?'. Influence - as much as the political traditions it succours - is also an invention: a product of, not something separate from, history. In essence, Jones shows us that claims, assumptions, or denials of influence - of the sort that Burke had and has on conservative traditions - have a history of their own and until we come to terms with this history, we risk not only misinterpreting that influence - i.e. Burke's relationship to conservatism - but asking the wrong questions about it.
When we think of British C/conservatism (both the party-political and the social philosophy) we think of Edmund Burke ... The association between Burke and such ideas has taken on the status of an immemorial truism. But the great value of Emily Jones's perceptive and erudite book is to show that this association was the outcome of a century of writing about Burke that only gradually turned him into a C/conservative master spirit. Hers is a compelling and admirably well-researched study in the construction of a durable political tradition.
rich, satisfyingly complex, rigorously researched, and vigorously written
superb analysis likely to become a classic of 'reception history'
perceptive and erudite a compelling and admirably well-researched study
well-grounded, and consistently interesting
Jones ... show[s] that Burke has much to offer readers grappling with their own situations.
However, if Burke is not the founder of modern conservatism, then when, why, and how was it invented? In particular, how did Burke become so linked with British conservatives? Jones provides a thorough, fascinating treatment of the question, examining how British historians, politicians, and political theorists understood the work, life, and significance of Burke. Most important, she shows that from the 1890s, Burke's corpus was 'de-contextualized' and his principles were 'gradually extracted,' forming an interpretation of 'Burke as C/conservative' and the 'invention' of modern conservatism. Jones's book is an illuminating, timely, important contribution to scholarship ... Highly recommended.
The power of Jones's analysis lies in the skill with which she shows how 'perceived similarities' dominate so much intellectual history and how, consequently, they misinform our understanding of the history of ideologies ... [A] vital contribution
[A] fascinating story
[Edmund Burke is] the subject of an intriguing, surprisingly accessible study by Emily Jones.
[This book] is by no means a traditional history of political thought. It is about public discourse in the broadest sense, basing its analysis on a wide variety of printed sources, from political journalism to philosophical treatises to calendars of evening classes. It offers by turns in-depth analyses of pivotal texts and speeches, and wider sampling from reviews, pamphlets, and Hansard. It deals with a topic of obvious importance in a consistently illuminating fashion, aiming to show how established party doctrines and entrenched assumptions rendered certain readings of Burke's ideas particularly persuasive ... a work of serious scholarship and methodological intent, which opens new doors in the study of political reputations. And at the absolute least, it must force historians to abandon their long-standing reflexive recourse to the adjective "Burkean" in writing on modern British politics.
Notă biografică
Emily Jones read for a BA in Politics and Modern History at the University of Manchester and, subsequently, the MSt and DPhil in History at Exeter College, University of Oxford. In 2015 she joined Pembroke College, University of Cambridge as the Mark Kaplanoff Research Fellow. Her current research focuses on the development of ideas about C/conservatism -- beyond Burke -- at the turn of the twentieth century.