Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops: Wageningen UR Frontis Series, cartea 7

Editat de Wageningen University
en Limba Engleză Paperback – iun 2005
Concern about the environmental impacts of transgenic crops is one of the major reasons for the EU’s quasi-moratorium on GMOs. The contributions in this book show that the economic implications of these concerns are far-reaching and complex. They range from the farm level to research and technology development on the one side and consumer reactions on the other side, and influence not only government response but also international trade and public and private incentives for R&D.
Each contribution includes a comment, which raises questions that need further investigation. A summary of the questions in research topics concludes the contributions. The book will be of interests for policy makers as well as scholars working in established areas of social and natural sciences with an interest in the complex issues related to the release of transgenic crops.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 62665 lei  43-57 zile
  SPRINGER NETHERLANDS – iun 2005 62665 lei  43-57 zile
Hardback (1) 63273 lei  43-57 zile
  SPRINGER NETHERLANDS – 2 mar 2005 63273 lei  43-57 zile

Din seria Wageningen UR Frontis Series

Preț: 62665 lei

Preț vechi: 73724 lei
-15% Nou

Puncte Express: 940

Preț estimativ în valută:
11993 12457$ 9962£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 03-17 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781402032486
ISBN-10: 140203248X
Pagini: 284
Ilustrații: IX, 269 p.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.4 kg
Ediția:2005
Editura: SPRINGER NETHERLANDS
Colecția Springer
Seria Wageningen UR Frontis Series

Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands

Public țintă

Research

Cuprins

Environmental benefits and costs of transgenic crops: introduction.- Environmental effects of genetically modified crops: differentiated risk assessment and management.- Comment on Ervin and Welsh: Environmental effects of genetically modified crops: differentiated risk assessment and management.- Assessing the environmental impact of changes in pesticide use on transgenic crops.- Comment on Kleter and Kuiper: Environmental fate and impact considerations related to the use of transgenic crops.- Biological limits on agricultural intensification: an example from resistance management.- Comment on Laxminarayan and Simpson: Biological limits on agricultural intensification: an example from resistance management.- Stability of pathogen-derived Potato virus Y resistance in potato under field conditions and some aspects of their ecological impact.- Comment on Schubert, Matoušek and Supp: Stability of pathogen-derived Potato virus Y resistance in potato under field conditions and some aspects of their ecological impact.- Bacillus thuringiensis resistance management: experiences from the USA.- Comment on Hurley: Bacillus thuringiensis resistance management: experiences from the USA.- Gene flow from crops to wild plants and its population-ecological consequences in the context of GM-crop biosafety, including some recent experiences from lettuce.- Comment on Van de Wiel, Groot and Den Nijs: Gene flow from crop to wild plants and its population-ecological consequences in the context of GM-crop biosafety, including some recent experiences from lettuce.- Irreversible costs and benefits of transgenic crops: what are they?.- Comment on Demont, Wesseler and Tollens: Irreversible costs and benefits of transgenic crops: what are they?.- Ex post evidence on adoption of transgenic crops:US soybeans.- Comment on Weaver: Ex post evidence on adoption of transgenic crops: US soybeans.- Spatial and temporal dynamics of gene movements arising from deployment of transgenic crops.- Comment on Gilligan, Claessen and Van den Bosch: Spatial and temporal dynamics of gene movements arising from deployment of transgenic crops.- Minimum distance requirements and liability: implications for co-existence.- Comment on Soregaroli and Wesseler: Minimum distance requirements and liability: implications for co-existence.- Biotechnology, the US-EU dispute and the Precautionary Principle.- Comment on Van den Belt: Biotechnology, the US-EU dispute and the Precautionary Principle.- Do patent-style intellectual property rights on transgenic crops harm the environment?.- Comment on Goeschl: Do patent-style intellectual property rights on transgenic crops harm the environment?.- Agricultural biotechnology and globalization: U.S. experience with public and private sector research.- Comment on Graff, Roland-Holst and Zilberman: Agricultural biotechnology and lobalization: how will public-private partnership evolve?.- Will consumers lose or gain from the environmental impacts of transgenic crops?.- Comment on Hobbs and Kerr: Will consumers lose or gain from the environmental impacts of transgenic crops?.- Conclusions.

Caracteristici

Concern about the environmental impacts of transgenic crops is one of the major reasons for the EU’s quasi-moratorium on GMOs Shows that the economic implications of these concerns are far-reaching and complex Range from the farm level to research and technology development on the one side and consumer reactions on the other side