Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Ethnocentrism and the English Dictionary: Routledge Studies in the History of Linguistics

Autor Phil Benson
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 11 ian 2001
This unique work challenges the assumption that dictionaries act as objective records of our language, and instead argues that the English dictionary is a fundamentally ethnocentric work. Using theoretical, historical and empirical analyses, Phil Benson shows how English dictionaries have filtered knowledge through predominantly Anglo-American perspectives. The book includes a major case study of the most recent edition of the Oxford English Dictionary and its treatment of China.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 31299 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 10 apr 2014 31299 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 66161 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 11 ian 2001 66161 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Routledge Studies in the History of Linguistics

Preț: 66161 lei

Preț vechi: 77835 lei
-15% Nou

Puncte Express: 992

Preț estimativ în valută:
12663 13285$ 10505£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 29 ianuarie-12 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780415220743
ISBN-10: 0415220742
Pagini: 240
Ilustrații: 6 Tables, black and white
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.6 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Studies in the History of Linguistics

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Cuprins

Introduction 1. Dictionaries and theories of language 2. The semiotics of the dictionary 3. The centre-periphery metaphor in action 4. The monolingual English dictionary up to Johnson 5. From Johnson to the OED 6. The lexicography of English as an international language 7. China in the OED: the wordlist 8. China in the OED: associating words with China 9. China in the OED: definitions 10. China in the OED: quotations 11. Conclusion

Descriere

This unique work challenges the assumption that dictionaries act as objective records of our language, and instead argues that the English dictionary is a fundamentally ethnocentric work.