Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Foundational Analysis: Presuppositions in Experimental Psychology: Routledge Progress in Psychology

Autor Pertti Saariluoma
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 10 iul 1997
In a critical analysis of the asumptions underlying experimental psychology, Pertti Saariluoma urges social scientists to reflect upon their procedures and methodology. He has revisited the philosophy of science to find a new way of applying its methods to psychology. Foundational Analysis shows how it is possible to analyze existing methodological arguments and find loopholes in them, and raises new issues for the rationale behind empirical technique. It will be of interest to researchers and students in cognitive science and other social sciences, and the philosophy of science.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Routledge Progress in Psychology

Preț: 98975 lei

Preț vechi: 120702 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1485

Preț estimativ în valută:
18955 19530$ 15879£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 24 februarie-10 martie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780415145855
ISBN-10: 0415145856
Pagini: 216
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 21 mm
Greutate: 0.36 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Progress in Psychology

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Cuprins

Chapter 1 Presuppositions in psychological argumentation; Chapter 2 Foundational analysis; Chapter 3 Operationalization analysis; Chapter 4 Concepts and conceptual postulates; Chapter 5 The consistency of theories; Chapter 6 Causal and representational explaining; Chapter 7 Foundational analysis and scientific progress; Chapter 8 Epilogue;

Notă biografică

Pertti Saariluoma is Professor of Cognitive Science at the University of Helsinki. He has been a visitor at the universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Carnegie-Mellon and Aberdeen. His previous publication include Chess Players’ Thinking (1995).

Descriere

In a critical analysis of the asumptions underlying experimental psychology, Pertti Saariluoma shows how it is possible to analyze existing methodological arguments and find loopholes in them.