Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals

Autor Immanuel Kant
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 10 iul 2011
Many of the earliest books, particularly those dating back to the 1900s and before, are now extremely scarce and increasingly expensive. We are republishing these classic works in affordable, high quality, modern editions, using the original text and artwork.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (17) 3804 lei  3-5 săpt.
  CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform – 3804 lei  3-5 săpt.
  CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform – 3983 lei  3-5 săpt.
  CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform – 4443 lei  3-5 săpt.
  5684 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Prometheus Books – 28 feb 1987 6447 lei  3-5 săpt.
  CREATESPACE – 9118 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Merchant Books – dec 2009 4480 lei  6-8 săpt.
  6491 lei  6-8 săpt.
  NuVision Publications – aug 2007 6743 lei  38-44 zile
  COLE PR – 10 iul 2011 6810 lei  38-44 zile
  Binker North – 14 ian 1785 7461 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Martino Fine Books – iun 2011 7757 lei  38-44 zile
  BLURB INC – 8 ian 2019 8040 lei  17-23 zile
  Book Jungle – 7 mai 2008 8128 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Book Jungle – 12 mar 2008 8929 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Theophania Publishing – 9977 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Echo Library – 31 oct 2006 10556 lei  38-44 zile
Hardback (2) 11011 lei  6-8 săpt. +4020 lei  4-10 zile
  Classic Wisdom Reprint – 9 apr 2019 11011 lei  6-8 săpt. +4020 lei  4-10 zile
  Binker North – 27 dec 2019 15986 lei  38-44 zile

Preț: 6810 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 102

Preț estimativ în valută:
1303 1354$ 1083£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 30 ianuarie-05 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781447418269
ISBN-10: 1447418263
Pagini: 76
Dimensiuni: 140 x 216 x 4 mm
Greutate: 0.11 kg
Editura: COLE PR

Notă biografică

Immanuel Kant ( 22 April 1724 - 12 February 1804) was an influential German philosopher[23] in the Age of Enlightenment. In his doctrine of transcendental idealism, he argued that space, time, and causation are mere sensibilities; "things-in-themselves" exist, but their nature is unknowable.[24][25] In his view, the mind shapes and structures experience, with all human experience sharing certain structural features. In one of his major works, the Critique of Pure Reason (1781; second edition 1787),[26] he drew a parallel to the Copernican revolution in his proposition that worldly objects can be intuited a priori ('beforehand'), and that intuition is therefore independent from objective reality.[b] Kant believed that reason is also the source of morality, and that aesthetics arise from a faculty of disinterested judgment. Kant's views continue to have a major influence on contemporary philosophy, especially the fields of epistemology, ethics, political theory, and post-modern aesthetics. He attempted to explain the relationship between reason and human experience and to move beyond the failures of traditional philosophy and metaphysics. He wanted to put an end to what he saw as an era of futile and speculative theories of human experience, while resisting the skepticism of thinkers such as David Hume. He regarded himself as showing the way past the impasse between rationalists and empiricists,[28] and is widely held to have synthesized both traditions in his thought.[29] Kant was an exponent of the idea that perpetual peace could be secured through universal democracy and international cooperation. He believed that this would be the eventual outcome of universal history, although it is not rationally planned.[30] The nature of Kant's religious ideas continues to be the subject of philosophical dispute, with viewpoints ranging from the impression that he was an initial advocate of atheism who at some point developed an ontological argument for God, to more critical treatments epitomized by Schopenhauer, who criticized the imperative form of Kantian ethics as "theological morals" and the "Mosaic Decalogue in disguise",[31] and Nietzsche, who claimed that Kant had "theologian blood"[32] and was merely a sophisticated apologist for traditional Christian faith