Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals

Autor Immanuel Kant
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 30 apr 2009
How should human beings behave toward one another? How must we behave? One of the most influential thinkers of the Western civilization, a man who profoundly shaped the mind-set of the modern world, Immanuel Kant developed his "Categorical Imperative" as a philosophical proof of the "Golden Rule," and in this 1873 essay, he elaborates upon and defends his understanding of the logical underpinnings of all human morality. Essential reading for anyone seeking an appreciation of modern philosophy, this is an intriguing and provocative work exploring the intersection of morality and reason. German metaphysician IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804) served as a librarian of the Royal Library, a prestigious government position, and as a professor at Konigsberg University. His other works include Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764), Critique of Pure Reason (1781), and Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785)."
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (4) 3192 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Dover Publications – 30 apr 2005 3192 lei  3-5 săpt.
  A & D Publishing – 17 feb 2008 7389 lei  6-8 săpt.
  COSIMO CLASSICS – 30 apr 2009 7461 lei  6-8 săpt.
  COSIMO CLASSICS – 30 oct 2008 8079 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 12873 lei  6-8 săpt.
  A & D Publishing – 2 apr 2018 12873 lei  6-8 săpt.

Preț: 7461 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 112

Preț estimativ în valută:
1428 1487$ 1176£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 31 ianuarie-14 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781605204529
ISBN-10: 1605204528
Pagini: 92
Dimensiuni: 140 x 216 x 6 mm
Greutate: 0.13 kg
Editura: COSIMO CLASSICS
Locul publicării:United States

Notă biografică

Immanuel Kant ( 22 April 1724 - 12 February 1804) was an influential German philosopher[23] in the Age of Enlightenment. In his doctrine of transcendental idealism, he argued that space, time, and causation are mere sensibilities; "things-in-themselves" exist, but their nature is unknowable.[24][25] In his view, the mind shapes and structures experience, with all human experience sharing certain structural features. In one of his major works, the Critique of Pure Reason (1781; second edition 1787),[26] he drew a parallel to the Copernican revolution in his proposition that worldly objects can be intuited a priori ('beforehand'), and that intuition is therefore independent from objective reality.[b] Kant believed that reason is also the source of morality, and that aesthetics arise from a faculty of disinterested judgment. Kant's views continue to have a major influence on contemporary philosophy, especially the fields of epistemology, ethics, political theory, and post-modern aesthetics. He attempted to explain the relationship between reason and human experience and to move beyond the failures of traditional philosophy and metaphysics. He wanted to put an end to what he saw as an era of futile and speculative theories of human experience, while resisting the skepticism of thinkers such as David Hume. He regarded himself as showing the way past the impasse between rationalists and empiricists,[28] and is widely held to have synthesized both traditions in his thought.[29] Kant was an exponent of the idea that perpetual peace could be secured through universal democracy and international cooperation. He believed that this would be the eventual outcome of universal history, although it is not rationally planned.[30] The nature of Kant's religious ideas continues to be the subject of philosophical dispute, with viewpoints ranging from the impression that he was an initial advocate of atheism who at some point developed an ontological argument for God, to more critical treatments epitomized by Schopenhauer, who criticized the imperative form of Kantian ethics as "theological morals" and the "Mosaic Decalogue in disguise",[31] and Nietzsche, who claimed that Kant had "theologian blood"[32] and was merely a sophisticated apologist for traditional Christian faith