History of the Supreme Court of the United States: Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States
Autor Charles Fairmanen Limba Engleză Hardback – 22 noi 2009
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Hardback (3) | 456.42 lei 43-57 zile | |
Cambridge University Press – 22 noi 2009 | 456.42 lei 43-57 zile | |
Cambridge University Press – 22 noi 2009 | 775.27 lei 43-57 zile | |
Cambridge University Press – 22 noi 2009 | 851.72 lei 43-57 zile |
Preț: 456.42 lei
Preț vechi: 563.49 lei
-19% Nou
Puncte Express: 685
Preț estimativ în valută:
87.38€ • 89.86$ • 72.49£
87.38€ • 89.86$ • 72.49£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 17 februarie-03 martie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780521769105
ISBN-10: 0521769108
Pagini: 224
Ilustrații: 57 b/w illus.
Dimensiuni: 162 x 239 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.5 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Seria Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 0521769108
Pagini: 224
Ilustrații: 57 b/w illus.
Dimensiuni: 162 x 239 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.5 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Seria Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Cuprins
1. The election of Tuesday, November 7, 1876 and the Electoral Commission Act of January 29, 1877; 2. Proceedings of the electoral commission; 3. 'Immense gratuitous and unfounded abuse'; 4. Nevins' Hewitt and the 'secret history'.
Notă biografică
Descriere
In this book, Charles Fairman examines the Supreme Court's participation in the Electoral Commission of 1877, paying particular attention to the role of Justice Joseph P. Bradley.
Recenzii
'This almost-immovable feast will guide and inform generations to come; any serious collection or library worth using will have a copy. Determined readers, blessed with good eyesight and sturdy bookrests, will exploit it as a standard by which to measure others' more modestly conceived efforts.' Harold B. Hyman, The American Historical Review
'Eschewing concepts such as judicial activism and judicial restraint, Fairman for the most part avoids generalization and interpretative summary. An admirer of Thayer and Frankfurter, he writes with judicious restraint and a keen appreciation for the difficulties faced by the court in this period of constitutional stress.' Herman Belz, University of Maryland
'Charles Fairman's magisterial volume sets an Olympian standard for the Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court … [H]is book is considerably more than a compendium. It is as well a creative work of historical scholarship. Never before has the political, social, and ideological context of the Court's decisions been set forth with such learning, or with such sensitivity to the surrounding milieu … Professor Fairman has produced a magnum opus. Its appearance is a notable event in the history of American legal scholarship.' Harvard Law Review
'Finally, my summary view of Fairman's work: the book is an awesome, if sometimes excruciatingly discursive, accomplishment. Its forbidding scope and excellence of detail have to be experienced rather than read about. For once, nomen est omen: the author bends over backward to be fair to all the data he has collected – and that is almost all the data there is.' Gerhard Casper, Columbia Law Review
'In this massive text (with a table of cases containing about 1,250 entries), Fairman has considered in great depth a far larger portion of the Court's decisions than has any previous scholar … [A]s an authoritative reference work which provides an elaborate and comprehensive tracing of doctrinal lines from one case to another – lines drawn expertly across formal topical boundaries – Reconstruction and Reunion will long stand as an indispensable tool for new scholarship.' American Journal of Legal History
'Eschewing concepts such as judicial activism and judicial restraint, Fairman for the most part avoids generalization and interpretative summary. An admirer of Thayer and Frankfurter, he writes with judicious restraint and a keen appreciation for the difficulties faced by the court in this period of constitutional stress.' Herman Belz, University of Maryland
'Charles Fairman's magisterial volume sets an Olympian standard for the Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court … [H]is book is considerably more than a compendium. It is as well a creative work of historical scholarship. Never before has the political, social, and ideological context of the Court's decisions been set forth with such learning, or with such sensitivity to the surrounding milieu … Professor Fairman has produced a magnum opus. Its appearance is a notable event in the history of American legal scholarship.' Harvard Law Review
'Finally, my summary view of Fairman's work: the book is an awesome, if sometimes excruciatingly discursive, accomplishment. Its forbidding scope and excellence of detail have to be experienced rather than read about. For once, nomen est omen: the author bends over backward to be fair to all the data he has collected – and that is almost all the data there is.' Gerhard Casper, Columbia Law Review
'In this massive text (with a table of cases containing about 1,250 entries), Fairman has considered in great depth a far larger portion of the Court's decisions than has any previous scholar … [A]s an authoritative reference work which provides an elaborate and comprehensive tracing of doctrinal lines from one case to another – lines drawn expertly across formal topical boundaries – Reconstruction and Reunion will long stand as an indispensable tool for new scholarship.' American Journal of Legal History