How To Do Things With Logic Workbook: Workbook with Exercises
Autor C. Grant Luckhardt, William Bechtel, Grant Luckhardten Limba Engleză Paperback – mar 1994
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 235.49 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Taylor & Francis – mar 1994 | 235.49 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 1011.57 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Taylor & Francis – 2 aug 2017 | 1011.57 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 235.49 lei
Preț vechi: 286.24 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 353
Preț estimativ în valută:
45.08€ • 47.26$ • 37.24£
45.08€ • 47.26$ • 37.24£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 29 ianuarie-12 februarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780805800777
ISBN-10: 0805800778
Pagini: 112
Dimensiuni: 210 x 280 x 7 mm
Greutate: 0.21 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Psychology Press
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 0805800778
Pagini: 112
Dimensiuni: 210 x 280 x 7 mm
Greutate: 0.21 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Psychology Press
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Public țintă
ProfessionalCuprins
Contents: Logic as a Tool. The Nature of Arguments. Valid Argument Forms. The Basic Argumentative Essay: Identifying Your Audience and Developing Your Conclusion. The Basic Argumentative Essay: Generating a Logical Diagram and Written Prose. Evaluation Arguments. Critiques: The Essential Preparation. Critiques: Types of Objections. Critiques: Presenting Objections. Defending Against a Critique. Authority. The Logic of Explanation. Arguing from Analogy.
Descriere
Descriere de la o altă ediție sau format:
This text aims to teach the constructions of good arguments first and then introduce criticism as a secondary skill. The emphasis is not on learning to name fallacies, but on being able to identify weaknesses in an argument so as to be able to construct an effective critique of that argument.
This text aims to teach the constructions of good arguments first and then introduce criticism as a secondary skill. The emphasis is not on learning to name fallacies, but on being able to identify weaknesses in an argument so as to be able to construct an effective critique of that argument.