How to Write and Illustrate a Scientific Paper
Autor Björn Gustaviien Limba Engleză Paperback – 15 feb 2017
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 177.39 lei 3-5 săpt. | +14.99 lei 7-13 zile |
Cambridge University Press – 15 feb 2017 | 177.39 lei 3-5 săpt. | +14.99 lei 7-13 zile |
Hardback (1) | 419.81 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Cambridge University Press – 15 feb 2017 | 419.81 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 177.39 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 266
Preț estimativ în valută:
33.95€ • 35.86$ • 28.38£
33.95€ • 35.86$ • 28.38£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 11-25 decembrie
Livrare express 27 noiembrie-03 decembrie pentru 24.98 lei
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781316607916
ISBN-10: 1316607917
Pagini: 240
Ilustrații: 71 b/w illus.
Dimensiuni: 153 x 228 x 10 mm
Greutate: 0.39 kg
Ediția:3Revizuită
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:Cambridge, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1316607917
Pagini: 240
Ilustrații: 71 b/w illus.
Dimensiuni: 153 x 228 x 10 mm
Greutate: 0.39 kg
Ediția:3Revizuită
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:Cambridge, United Kingdom
Cuprins
Preface to the third edition; Acknowledgements; 1. Basic rules of writing; 2. Comments on scientific writing; 3. Drafting the manuscript; 4. Choosing a journal; 5. How to begin; 6. Figure captions (legends); 7. Preparing a graph; 8. Graph combination; 9. Drawings; 10. How to design a table; 11. Title; 12. Authors; 13. Abstract; 14. Introduction; 15. Methods; 16. Results; 17. Discussion; 18. Acknowledgements; 19. References; 20. PhD and other doctoral theses; 21. Letters and case reports; 22. Numbers; 23. Abbreviations; 24. How to present statistical results; 25. Typing; 26. Dealing with editors and referees; 27. Correcting proofs; 28. Authors' responsibility; Literature needed on your desk; Further reading; Literature cited; Index.
Recenzii
Review of previous edition: 'This book ranks with the best in the field. It is brief, to the point and easy to follow … useful to the author and editor … recommended.' Research Communications in Molecular Pathology and Pharmacology
Review of previous edition: '… short and straightforward … complete and user-friendly … for those making their first public steps in science, Gustavii's book is certainly very useful.' Annals of Human Biology
Review of previous edition: '… enjoyable and well written … an ideal reference book to have at hand when writing and organizing many types of scientific literature.' The British Society for Cell Biology
Review of previous edition: '… a very welcome learning resource … clear and concise … well structured, easy to read and well-illustrated … a highly useful resource indeed … [I] would highly recommend it.' The Biologist
Review of previous edition: 'Every aspiring writer should read and follow the advice in How to Write and Illustrate a Scientific Paper. Even accomplished scientific authors will add to their proficiency by going through this enjoyable volume.' Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Review of previous edition: '… short and straightforward … complete and user-friendly … for those making their first public steps in science, Gustavii's book is certainly very useful.' Annals of Human Biology
Review of previous edition: '… enjoyable and well written … an ideal reference book to have at hand when writing and organizing many types of scientific literature.' The British Society for Cell Biology
Review of previous edition: '… a very welcome learning resource … clear and concise … well structured, easy to read and well-illustrated … a highly useful resource indeed … [I] would highly recommend it.' The Biologist
Review of previous edition: 'Every aspiring writer should read and follow the advice in How to Write and Illustrate a Scientific Paper. Even accomplished scientific authors will add to their proficiency by going through this enjoyable volume.' Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Descriere
A concise and easy-to-read guide to writing and illustrating a scientific paper, detailing examples of good versus bad practice.