Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law: Legality vs Legal Certainty in Europe

Editat de Mariolina Eliantonio, Dacian Dragos
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 27 mai 2024
This book provides a comparative analysis of the concept and concrete application of the system of indirect review of administrative action. The indirect review of administrative action is a judicial review mechanism that permits re-visiting already settled administrative measures. As an indirect way of challenging the validity of a measure or act by attacking the legal basis on which it is founded, it can regard either general acts or individual acts and measures. This book explores whether the system of indirect review is a suitable remedy for modern administrative justice, assessing whether it fairly balances the legality and the legal certainty principles. It examines the tension between the two principles and seeks to establish what the standards of review are and whether a common European trend can be discerned by analysing the theory and practice from jurisdictions in Western and Eastern Europe, as well as the EU legal system. The book will be a valuable resource for academics, researchers and policy-makers working in the areas of Administrative Law, EU law, and Public Administration.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 31141 lei  3-5 săpt. +2267 lei  7-13 zile
  Taylor & Francis – 27 mai 2024 31141 lei  3-5 săpt. +2267 lei  7-13 zile
Hardback (1) 86806 lei  3-5 săpt. +2680 lei  7-13 zile
  Taylor & Francis – 11 noi 2022 86806 lei  3-5 săpt. +2680 lei  7-13 zile

Preț: 31141 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 467

Preț estimativ în valută:
5966 6281$ 4925£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 01-15 ianuarie 25
Livrare express 18-24 decembrie pentru 3266 lei

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780367758622
ISBN-10: 0367758628
Pagini: 256
Ilustrații: 6
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Public țintă

Postgraduate

Cuprins

Lists of figures  List of tables  List of contributors  Introduction. The Indirect Review of Administrative Action in search of a fair balance between legality and legal certainty  1. Balancing legality and legal certainty: the plea of illegality in Belgian public law and the role of the Council of State and other judicial bodies  2. The Indirect Review of Administrative Action in the Czech Republic  3. Collateral challenges in England and Wales: More questions than answers  4. The system of indirect control of legality in French public law: between objective legality and increasing attention for legal certainty  5. Hierarchy of Norms, Iura Novit Curia and No Need to Plea for Indirect Review of Administrative Action – The Strictly German Legal Point of View  6. Rebalancing indirect judicial review of administrative action in The Netherlands  7. The indirect review of administrative action in Romania: the triumph of legality over legal certainty  8. Hitting not only the Target: The Indirect Review of Administrative Action in Serbia and Croatia  9. The Indirect Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Spain  10. The Indirect Review of Administrative Action in Sweden – Control and Judicial Protection  11. The plea of illegality in EU law: the missing piece in the puzzle of a ‘complete system of remedies’?  Annex  Index

Notă biografică

Mariolina Eliantonio is Professor of European and Comparative Administrative Law and Procedure, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Dacian C. Dragos is Jean Monnet Professor of Administrative and European Law at the Public Management and Administration Department, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj Napoca, Romania.

Descriere

This book provides a comparative analysis of the concept and concrete application of the system of indirect review of administrative action. The work explores whether the system of indirect review is a suitable remedy for modern administrative justice, assessing if it fairly balances the legality and the legal certainty principles.