Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
Judicial Decision-Making: Integrating Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives de Piotr Bystranowski

Judicial Decision-Making: Integrating Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives: Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship, cartea 14

Editat de Piotr Bystranowski, Bartosz Janik, Maciej Próchnicki
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 5 noi 2023
This book shares state-of-the-art insights on judicial decision-making from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. It offers in-depth coverage of the forefront of the field and reviews the most important issues and discussions connected with an empirical approach to judicial decision-making. It also addresses the challenges of judicial psychology to the ideal of rule of law and explores the promise and perils of applying artificial intelligence in law. In closing, it offers empirically-driven guidance on ways to improve the quality of legal reasoning.

Chapter “The Challenges of Artificial Judicial Decision-Making for Liberal Democracy” is available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com. 
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 86082 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 5 noi 2023 86082 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 86667 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 4 noi 2022 86667 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship

Preț: 86082 lei

Preț vechi: 104978 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1291
Preț estimativ în valută:
16474€ • 17326$ • 13723£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 03-17 ianuarie 25

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783031117466
ISBN-10: 3031117468
Pagini: 204
Ilustrații: VIII, 204 p. 1 illus.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.31 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2022
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Springer
Seria Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship

Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland

Cuprins

Introduction.- What do we Mean by Precedent? Empirical Evidence of Ordinary Usage.- Severity Bias Across Different Types of Mens rea.- "That's Him!": Evaluating a Hypothesis about Guilt Within the Context of a Suspect Lineup.- Judicial Discretion and Debiasing.- The Whole Truth About Dina: Judicial Reasoning and the Conjunction Fallacy.- An Analytic Framework for the Study of Legal Actors.- Judicial Activism – The Need for Parameters: Analysis of Legal Reasoning in Judicial Review.- How Authoritarian is the Slovenian Constitutional Court?.- Hercules on a Diet.- Exploring the Challenges of Artificial Judicial Decision Making for Liberal Democracy.

Notă biografică

Piotr Bystranowski is an assistant professor at the Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics at the Jagiellonian University. His research interests include philosophy of criminal law, judicial decision-making, computational methods in law and philosophy.

Bartosz Janik is an adjunct professor at the Faculty of Law and Administration at the University of Silesia in Katowice. His research interests include analytical philosophy of law, judicial decision making and philosophy of psychiatry.

Maciej Próchnicki is a PhD Candidate at Jagiellonian University, where he prepares a dissertation about issuing numerical verdicts in legal proceedings. His research interests include topics at the intersection of legal and cognitive sciences, especially judicial decision making.

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This book shares state-of-the-art insights on judicial decision-making from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. It offers in-depth coverage of the forefront of the field and reviews the most important issues and discussions connected with an empirical approach to judicial decision-making. It also addresses the challenges of judicial psychology to the ideal of rule of law and explores the promise and perils of applying artificial intelligence in law. In closing, it offers empirically-driven guidance on ways to improve the quality of legal reasoning.

Chapter “The Challenges of Artificial Judicial Decision-Making for Liberal Democracy” is available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com. 

Caracteristici

Offers empirical – both observational and experimental alike – insights into theoretical discussions Presents an interdisciplinary approach to judicial decision-making Examines theories in legal philosophy from an empirical standpoint