The concretization of general clauses of tort is carried out with the help of the terms: damage, causality, fault and wrongfulness. The attempt is made to limit liability solely by interpreting these abstract and general conditions of liability. However, such a system structure is not efficient. It leads to normative hypertrophy of the system. What is lost are the true arguments that decide on the liability issue. They disappear in the shadow of the constant conceptual game. The failure of traditional system structure requires the search for possible alternatives. In order to combine the adaptability of the system with legal certainty, the author suggests a system consisting of a movable general clause and topically formulated individual norms.