Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration: Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue

Autor Jakob Karl Rinderknecht
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 17 oct 2016
 This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. 

In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.

Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 45091 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 20 iun 2018 45091 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 61790 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 17 oct 2016 61790 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue

Preț: 61790 lei

Preț vechi: 72695 lei
-15% Nou

Puncte Express: 927

Preț estimativ în valută:
11826 12476$ 9855£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 02-16 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783319400983
ISBN-10: 3319400983
Pagini: 313
Ilustrații: IX, 281 p. 17 illus.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 x 26 mm
Greutate: 0.47 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2016
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Palgrave Macmillan
Seria Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue

Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland

Cuprins

Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion.- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques.- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj.- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus.- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping.- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus?.- 4. Consensus Despite Difference.- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus.- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology.- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend:  Trent & Concupiscence.- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj.- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator.- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj.- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.     

Recenzii

“This inspiring book should become required reading both in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome and for the bookkeepers of Lutheran orthodoxy, but also for all theologians who deal with Christians from different confessions and traditions.” (Theodor Dieter, Anglican Theological Review, Vol. 101 (4), 2019)

Notă biografică

 Jakob Karl Rinderknecht is Director of the Pastoral Institute and an Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at the University of the Incarnate Word, USA. He is also a Postdoctoral Fellow of the Louisville Institute, USA. His research on ecumenical questions has appeared in Horizons and The American Benedictine Review.

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.

Caracteristici

Winner of the Harding Meyer Prize in Ecumenism, 2020 Provides a timely addition to the study of ecumenism at the 500th anniversary of the Reformation Offers a unique approach to the question of differentiated consensus that makes use of the tools of contemporary cognitive linguistics Investigates the embodied character of human knowing to demonstrate that agreements between communities require understanding the particular structures of language operative in each group