Cantitate/Preț
Produs

National Laws and International Commerce: The Problem of Extraterritoriality: Routledge Library Editions: International Trade Policy

Autor Douglas E. Rosenthal, William M. Knighton
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 12 oct 2017
This Chatham House Paper, first published in 1982, examines the problem of extraterritoriality. A wide range of economic activity is subject to the laws of more than one state, yet there is little provision for resolving situations where states impose contradictory requirements. This paper is particularly concerned with four areas of difficulty: extraterritorial anti-trust enforcement; overlapping regulatory claims; economic regulation for political aims; and different approaches to adjudication.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 31676 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 8 mai 2019 31676 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 59627 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 12 oct 2017 59627 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Routledge Library Editions: International Trade Policy

Preț: 59627 lei

Preț vechi: 90024 lei
-34% Nou

Puncte Express: 894

Preț estimativ în valută:
11415 11865$ 9464£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 06-20 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781138309432
ISBN-10: 1138309435
Pagini: 110
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Library Editions: International Trade Policy

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Cuprins

1. Overview  2. The Effects Doctrine and Antitrust Law  3. Overlapping Claims to Regulate Multi-State Transactions  4. Economic Regulation for Political Aims  5. Adjudication in the Courts of One Nation  6. Conclusions

Notă biografică

Douglas E. Rosenthal, William M. Knighton

Descriere

This Chatham House Paper, first published in 1982, examines the problem of extraterritoriality. A wide range of economic activity is subject to the laws of more than one state, yet there is little provision for resolving situations where states impose contradictory requirements.