Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
Nietzsche and the Origin of Virtue de Lester H. Hunt

Nietzsche and the Origin of Virtue

Autor Lester H. Hunt
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 6 mai 1993
In Ecce Homo (1908) Friedrich Nietzsche calls himself "the first immoralist" and adds "that makes me the annihilator par excellence".
Lester Hunt examines this and other radical claims in order to show that Nietzsche does have a coherent ethical and political philosophy. He uses Nietzsche's writings as a starting point for a critique of a wider, contemporary ethical project - one that should inform our lives as well as our thoughts.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 36396 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 6 mai 1993 36396 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 76420 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 31 mar 2016 76420 lei  6-8 săpt.

Preț: 36396 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 546
Preț estimativ în valută:
6966€ • 7179$ • 5881£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 03-17 martie

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780415095808
ISBN-10: 0415095808
Pagini: 224
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.32 kg
Ediția:Revised edition
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Recenzii

`Hunt's interpretation is ... not only a new interpretation of Nietzsche, but also a representation of a significant position in ethical and political philosophy' - Richard Schacht, University of Illinois

Cuprins

Editor’s foreword, Preface and acknowledgements, Note on translations, citations, and abbreviations, 1 INTRODUCTION: READING NIETZSCHE, 2 IMMORALISM, 3 POLITICS AND ANTI-POLITICS, 4 CHAOS AND ORDER, 5 VIRTUE, 6 JUSTICE AND THE GIFT-GIVING VIRTUE, 7 WHICH TRAITS ARE VIRTUES?, 8 IMMORALISM AGAIN, 9 CONCLUSION: VIRTUE AND SOCIETY, Notes, Index

Descriere

Lester Hunt examines in detail areas such as Nietzsche's views on human rights, his `anti-political` stance and his unusual use of the idea of `experimentation' as an ethical ideal. Should we accept and use his ideas?