Nietzsche's Critiques: The Kantian Foundations of His Thought
Autor R. Kevin Hillen Limba Engleză Paperback – 7 iul 2005
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 350.25 lei 31-37 zile | |
OUP OXFORD – 7 iul 2005 | 350.25 lei 31-37 zile | |
Hardback (1) | 340.41 lei 31-37 zile | |
OUP OXFORD – 29 mai 2003 | 340.41 lei 31-37 zile |
Preț: 350.25 lei
Preț vechi: 408.01 lei
-14% Nou
Puncte Express: 525
Preț estimativ în valută:
67.03€ • 69.63$ • 55.68£
67.03€ • 69.63$ • 55.68£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 22-28 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780199285525
ISBN-10: 0199285527
Pagini: 260
Ilustrații: 1 table
Dimensiuni: 157 x 233 x 16 mm
Greutate: 0.41 kg
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 0199285527
Pagini: 260
Ilustrații: 1 table
Dimensiuni: 157 x 233 x 16 mm
Greutate: 0.41 kg
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Recenzii
...a major and important contribution to Nietzsche studies...superior to any other so far published...
Although some commentators consider Nietzsche sufficiently influenced by Kant to count him a neo-Kantian, the English literature on Nietzsche contains little information about what Nietzsche actually read of Kant's, much less a detailed study of Nietzsche's debt to Kant. Kevin Hill's book is a noteworthy attempt to fill in this gap in Nietzsche scholarship. Hill effectively counters the common view that Nietzsche neither read much Kant nor understood him very well, and that he arrived at his view of Kant largely through the distorting lens of Schopenhauer's philosophy. . . . Hill's book is to be recommended . . . for its provocative interpretation of Nietzsche's debt to Kant.
Although some commentators consider Nietzsche sufficiently influenced by Kant to count him a neo-Kantian, the English literature on Nietzsche contains little information about what Nietzsche actually read of Kant's, much less a detailed study of Nietzsche's debt to Kant. Kevin Hill's book is a noteworthy attempt to fill in this gap in Nietzsche scholarship. Hill effectively counters the common view that Nietzsche neither read much Kant nor understood him very well, and that he arrived at his view of Kant largely through the distorting lens of Schopenhauer's philosophy. . . . Hill's book is to be recommended . . . for its provocative interpretation of Nietzsche's debt to Kant.