Perfecting Justice in Rawls, Habermas and Honneth: A Deconstructive Perspective: Continuum Studies in Political Philosophy
Autor Dr Miriam Bankovskyen Limba Engleză Hardback – 22 feb 2012
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 255.16 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Bloomsbury Publishing – 20 noi 2013 | 255.16 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 882.26 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Bloomsbury Publishing – 22 feb 2012 | 882.26 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 882.26 lei
Preț vechi: 1282.43 lei
-31% Nou
Puncte Express: 1323
Preț estimativ în valută:
168.88€ • 181.58$ • 140.79£
168.88€ • 181.58$ • 140.79£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 20 decembrie 24 - 03 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781441195418
ISBN-10: 1441195416
Pagini: 256
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 25 mm
Greutate: 0.52 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Continuum
Seria Continuum Studies in Political Philosophy
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1441195416
Pagini: 256
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 25 mm
Greutate: 0.52 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Continuum
Seria Continuum Studies in Political Philosophy
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Caracteristici
Explores and deconstructs theories of justice presented by three major political thinkers
Notă biografică
Miriam Bankovsky lectures in politics at La Trobe University, Australia. She is the co-editor, with Alice Le Goff, of Recognition theory and contemporary French moral and political philosophy: Reopening the dialogue (2012).
Cuprins
Acknowledgements \ 1. Perfecting justice: an art of the im/possible \ Part I. Justice as fairness: a project to pursue \ 2. Rawls and the possibility of 'ideal theory' \ 3. Rawls and the 'undecidability' of the original position procedure \ Part II. Rational consensus: open to contestation in principle \ 4. Habermas and the possibility of popular sovereignty \ 5. Habermas and the perfectibility of deliberative outcomes \ Part III. Perfecting recognition relations \ 6. Honneth and the possibility of mutual recognition \ 7. Honneth and moral progress in the quality of recognition relations \ 8. Im/possibility and the cultivation of deconstructive civic attitudes \ Bibliography \ Index
Recenzii
In this clearly written and carefully argued book, Miriam Bankovsky brings Jacques Derrida's deconstruction to bear on Rawls, Habermas and Honneth to develop a deconstructive perspective on justice that does not simply deny the possibility of justice. The book will be hard to ignore for anyone interested in the relationship between these thinkers.
Miriam Bankovsky's exemplary book offers a thoughtful reflection on theorizing justice, which demonstrates the benefits of bringing different traditions of thought into dialogue with one another. Lucidly written and compellingly argued, it offers both a distinctive account of theorizing justice as a civic activity and provides the basis for a productive rapprochement between contrasting approaches to this activity.
Miriam Bankovsky's exemplary book offers a thoughtful reflection on theorizing justice, which demonstrates the benefits of bringing different traditions of thought into dialogue with one another. Lucidly written and compellingly argued, it offers both a distinctive account of theorizing justice as a civic activity and provides the basis for a productive rapprochement between contrasting approaches to this activity.