Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Pesky Essays on the Logic of Philosophy: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, cartea 6

Autor Kenneth G. Lucey
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 4 dec 2014
This collection of essays explores the philosophy of human knowledge from a multitude of perspectives, with a particular emphasis upon the justification component of the classical analysis of knowledge and with an excursion along the way to explore the role of knowledge in Texas Hold ‘Em poker.
An important theme of the collection is the role of knowledge in religion, including a detailed argument for agnosticism. A number of the essays touch upon issues in philosophical logic, among them a fascinating new counter-example to Modus Ponens. The collection is rounded out with essays on causality and the philosophy of mind.
The author’s perspective on the philosophy of human knowledge is fresh and challenging, as evidenced by essays entitled “On Epistemic Preferability;” “On Being Unjustified;” “The Logic of ‘Unless’” and “Is ‘This sentence is true.’ True?”
An interesting feature of The Logic of Philosophy: Pesky Essays is the inclusion of responses to several of its key essays, contributed by such prominent contemporary philosophers as Roderick Chisholm, Ted Sider and Tomas Kapitan.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 37787 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 23 aug 2016 37787 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 38507 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 4 dec 2014 38507 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning

Preț: 38507 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 578

Preț estimativ în valută:
7370 7732$ 6114£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 29 ianuarie-12 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783319080628
ISBN-10: 3319080628
Pagini: 240
Ilustrații: IX, 240 p. 13 illus.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.53 kg
Ediția:2015
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Springer
Seria Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning

Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland

Public țintă

Research

Cuprins

Introduction.- Knowledge & Justification.- What is Knowing?.- Scales of Epistemic Appraisal.- On Epistemic Preferability.- On Being Unjustified.- “I Should Have Known It!”: Gilbert Ryle and Poker Knowledge.- Philosophy of Religion.- An Agnostic Argument.- “Lucey’s Agnosticism: The Believer’s Reply by Tomis Kapitan.- Theism, Necessity and Invalidity.- Logical Form and the Ontological Argument.- Philosophical Logic.- Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.- A New Counter-Example to Modus Ponens.- Comments on Lucey’s “An Invalid Instance of Modus Ponens” by Ted Sider.- The Ancestral Relation Without Classes.- Laws of Excluded Middle And a Temporal Dilemma.- The Logic of ‘Unless’.- Harry Frankfurt on Why We Care About Truth.- Causality and the Mind.- An Analysis of Causal Contribution; (co-authored with Carol A. Lucey).- The Testability of the Identity Theory.- On Being Purely Psychological.- “Comments on Lucey’s Paper” by R. M. Chisholm.-Ontological Parasites.- Is There A Set of All Truths?.- The Generalization Argument Defended.-Taxonomies & Teaching.- Rudolf Carnap on False Propositions & Specificity.     

Notă biografică

Kenneth Lucey is Sanford Distinguished Professor of the Humanities at the University of Nevada, Reno, U.S.A. He is a philosophical generalist with wide interests in epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of religion and philosophical logic.

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This collection of essays explores the philosophy of human knowledge from a multitude of perspectives, with a particular emphasis upon the justification component of the classical analysis of knowledge, and with an excursion along the way to explore the role of knowledge in Texas Hold ‘Em poker.
An important theme of the collection is the role of knowledge in religion, including a detailed argument for agnosticism. A number of the essays touch upon issues in philosophical logic, among them a fascinating new counter-example to Modus Ponens. The collection is rounded out with essays on causality and the philosophy of mind.
The author’s perspective on the philosophy of human knowledge is fresh and challenging, as evidenced by essays entitled “On Epistemic Preferability;” “On Being Unjustified;” “The Logic of ‘Unless’” and “Is ‘This sentence is true.’ True?”
An interesting feature of The Logic of Philosophy: Pesky Essays is the inclusion of responses to several of its key essays, contributed by such prominent contemporary philosophers as Roderick Chisholm, Ted Sider and Tomas Kapitan.

Caracteristici

Spans a wide range of subjects, including the philosophy of human knowledge, the role of knowledge in religion, causality and the philosophy of mind Discusses issues in philosophical logic, including a new counter-example to Modus Ponens Includes responses to key essays by prominent contemporary philosophers including Roderick Chisholm, Ted Sider and Tomis Kapitan Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras