Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Plato's Use of Fallacy (RLE: Plato): A Study of the Euthydemus and some Other Dialogues: Routledge Library Editions: Plato

Autor Rosamond Sprague
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 10 iun 2014
There are many fallacious arguments in the dialogues of Plato. The author argues that Plato was fully conscious of the fallacious character of at least an important number of these arguments and that he sometimes made deliberate use of fallacy as an indirect means of setting forth certain of his fundamental philosophical views. Plato introduces them, the author maintains, for the purpose of working out their implications. Plato is thus able to expose them for what they are, to clear away possible lines of attack upon his own position, and even to show that when the proper correction is applied his own views receive support.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 31987 lei  43-57 zile
  Taylor & Francis – 10 iun 2014 31987 lei  43-57 zile
Hardback (1) 62310 lei  43-57 zile
  Taylor & Francis – 10 sep 2012 62310 lei  43-57 zile

Din seria Routledge Library Editions: Plato

Preț: 31987 lei

Preț vechi: 41478 lei
-23% Nou

Puncte Express: 480

Preț estimativ în valută:
6122 6359$ 5085£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 03-17 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781138007710
ISBN-10: 1138007714
Pagini: 4
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.25 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Library Editions: Plato

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Public țintă

General, Postgraduate, Professional, and Undergraduate

Cuprins

Introduction 1. The Euthydemus Introduction (271A-275D) Scene I (275D-278E) Scene II (278E-282D) Scene III (282D-288D) Scene IV (288D-293A) Scene V(293A-304C) Epilogue (304C-307C) 2. Theaetetus (163Aff.) 3. Cratylus (429Bff.) 4. The Hippias Minor. Conclusion. Appendix. Fr. Bichenski on Plato’s Logic. General Index. Index of Passages.

Descriere

There are many fallacious arguments in the dialogues of Plato. The author argues that Plato was fully conscious of the fallacious character of at least an important number of these arguments and that he sometimes made deliberate use of fallacy as an indirect means of setting forth certain of his fundamental philosophical views. Plato introduces them, the author maintains, for the purpose of working out their implications. Plato is thus able to expose them for what they are, to clear away possible lines of attack upon his own position, and even to show that when the proper correction is applied his own views receive support.