Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Precautionary Reasoning in Environmental and Public Health Policy: The International Library of Bioethics, cartea 86

Autor David B. Resnik
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 29 mar 2022
This book fills a gap in the literature on the Precautionary Principle by placing the principle within the wider context of precautionary reasoning and uses philosophical arguments and case studies to demonstrate when it does—and does not—apply.  The book invites the reader to take a step back from the controversy surrounding the Precautionary Principle and consider the overarching rationales for responding to threats to the environment or public health.  It provides practical guidance and probing insight for the intended audience, including scholars, students, journalists, and policymakers. 


Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 64334 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 29 mar 2022 64334 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 64824 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 28 mar 2021 64824 lei  3-5 săpt.

Din seria The International Library of Bioethics

Preț: 64334 lei

Preț vechi: 75686 lei
-15% Nou

Puncte Express: 965

Preț estimativ în valută:
12312 12837$ 10232£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 21 martie-04 aprilie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783030707934
ISBN-10: 3030707938
Ilustrații: XVIII, 335 p. 21 illus.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.5 kg
Ediția:2021
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Springer
Seria The International Library of Bioethics

Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland

Cuprins

Chapter 1. Precautionary Reasoning.- Chapter 2. Decision Theory.- Chapter 3. Moral Theory.- Chapter 4. The Precautionary Principle.- Chapter 5. Precautionary Reasoning and the Precautionary Principle.- Chapter 6. Chemical Regulation.- Chapter 7. Genetic Engineering.- Chapter 8. Dual Use Research in the Biomedical Sciences.- Chapter 9. Public Health Emergencies.- Chapter 10. Conclusion.



Notă biografică

Dr. Resnik has been a Bioethicist at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health since 2004. Dr. Resnik was an Associate and Full Professor of Medical Humanities at the Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University (ECU) from 1998-2004, and an Associate Director of the Bioethics Center at ECU and University Health Systems from 1998-2004.  Dr. Resnik was Assistant and Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Wyoming (UW) from 1990-1998, and Director of the Center for the Advancement of Ethics at UW from 1995-1998. Dr. Resnik has an M.A. and Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and J.D. from Concord University School of Law. He received his B.A. in philosophy from Davidson College.  Dr. Resnik has published over 300 articles and 9 books on various topics in philosophy and bioethics and is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He serves onseveral editorial boards and is an Associate Editor of the journal Accountability in Research.  Dr. Resnik is also a Certified IRB Professional.  


Textul de pe ultima copertă

This book fills a gap in the literature on the Precautionary Principle by placing the principle within the wider context of precautionary reasoning and uses philosophical arguments and case studies to demonstrate when it does—and does not—apply.  The book invites the reader to take a step back from the controversy surrounding the Precautionary Principle and consider the overarching rationales for responding to threats to the environment or public health.  It provides practical guidance and probing insight for the intended audience, including scholars, students, journalists, and policymakers. 


Caracteristici

Develops a novel and useful approach to precautionary reasoning in environmental and public health policy Places the Precautionary Principle within the wider context of precautionary reasoning Uses philosophical arguments and case studies to demonstrate when the principle does—and does not—apply