Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice: Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law, cartea 22

Editat de Mordechai Kremnitzer, Talya Steiner, Andrej Lang
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 29 apr 2020
Proportionality in Action presents an empirical and comparative exploration of the proportionality doctrine, based on detailed accounts of the application of the framework by apex courts in six jurisdictions: Germany, Canada, South Africa, Israel, Poland and India. The analysis of each country is written and contextualized by a constitutional scholar from the relevant jurisdiction. Each country analysis draws upon a large sample of case law and employs a mixed methodological approach: an expansive coding scheme allows for quantitative analysis providing comparable and quantifiable measurements, which is enriched by qualitative analysis that engages with the substance of the decisions and captures nuance, contextualizing the data and providing it with meaning. The book concludes with a comparative chapter that synthesizes some of the most interesting findings. Focusing on deviations of the practice of proportionality from theory, the authors conclude their argument in support of an integrated approach to the application of proportionality.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 35011 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Cambridge University Press – 10 aug 2022 35011 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 99294 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Cambridge University Press – 29 apr 2020 99294 lei  3-5 săpt.

Din seria Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law

Preț: 99294 lei

Preț vechi: 115458 lei
-14% Nou

Puncte Express: 1489

Preț estimativ în valută:
19005 19754$ 15743£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 14-28 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781108497589
ISBN-10: 1108497586
Pagini: 686
Ilustrații: 36 b/w illus. 2 tables
Dimensiuni: 159 x 234 x 38 mm
Greutate: 1.04 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Seria Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law

Locul publicării:Cambridge, United Kingdom

Cuprins

Introduction. Analyzing proportionality comparatively and empirically Talya Steiner, Andrej Lang and Mordechai Kremnitzer; 1. Proportionality analysis by the German Federal Constitutional Court Andrej Lang; 2. Proportionality analysis by the Canadian Supreme Court Lorian Hardcastle; 3. Proportionality analysis by the South African Constitutional Court Richard Stacey; 4. Proportionality analysis by the Israeli Supreme Court Talya Steiner; 5. Proportionality analysis by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal Anna Śledzińska-Simon; 6. Proportionality analysis by the Indian Supreme Court Aparna Chandra; 7. Comparative and empirical insights into judicial practice: towards an integrative model of proportionality Talya Steiner, Andrej Lang and Mordechai Kremnitzer; Index.

Recenzii

'It lifts the discussion on proportionality out of the theoretical plane and places in squarely in the realm of the empirical. Their contribution is in other words exceptionally important, in steering the normative debate from a spiral of theoretical debates lifting ever further from the ground, to one shaped by the reality of practice. It is in short a considerable feat of comparative empirical constitutional scholarship.' Liora Lazarus, Associate Professor in Law, University of Oxford
'Originally developed by the German Constitutional Court, proportionality as a tool to examine limitations or infringements of fundamental rights is today discussed worldwide and practiced in more and more countries, albeit in different ways. The comparison of six leading jurisdictions makes this book a foremost source of information on the proportionality principle and a valuable guide for its practical use.' Dieter Grimm, Professor of Law, Humboldt University Berlin and Former Justice of the German Constitutional Court

Descriere

A comparative and empirical analysis of proportionality in the case law of six constitutional and supreme courts.