Scepticism and the Possibility of Knowledge

en Limba Engleză Paperback – 25 noi 2009

In seeking understanding of the human condition we need more than just a set of beliefs about it: all belief is irrational. We want to know or garner some kind of proof about the fundamental truths of human existence. This book illuminates this issue.

Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

	Preț	Express
Paperback (1)	106^.59 lei 6-8 săpt.
Bloomsbury Publishing – 25 noi 2009	106^.59 lei 6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1)	247^.75 lei 6-8 săpt.
Bloomsbury Publishing – 4 ian 2008	247^.75 lei 6-8 săpt.

Preț: 106^.59 lei

Preț vechi: 176^.39 lei
-40% Nou

Puncte Express: 160

:
20^.40€ • 21^.52$ • 17^.00£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 03-17 ianuarie 25

Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!

Adaugă în listă

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781441154361
ISBN-10: 1441154361
Pagini: 224
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 16 mm
Greutate: 0.3 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Continuum
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

Grayling is the foremost philosopher and commentator regularly invited onto radio and television programmes to voice his opinion on current issues.

Cuprins

IntroductionAcnowledgementsPart I CARTESIAN RESPONSESi. Berkeley's Immaterialismii Russell, Experience, and the Roots of Science.iii Russell's Transcendental Argument in An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry Part II VARIETIES OF NATURALISMi. Wittgenstein On Certaintyii. Quine's Naturalistic AssumptionsPart III SCEPTICISM AND JUSTIFICATION

Recenzii

"Grayling (philosophy, Birkbeck Coll., Univ. of London) sets himself the goal of refuting-or at least of attempting to refute-the philosophical doctrine that absolute knowledge is impossible. To do so, he considers two sets of arguments from major antiskeptical philosophers-Berkeley and Russell in one tradition and Quine and Wittgenstein in another-and argues that the strategies the aforementioned philosophers used to accomplish their goals are "not so much incorrect as incomplete." He thereupon argues in extensive, closely reasoned, if often turgid detail, his own stratagem-which, he believes, "is the right one overall." Because of the fecundity of the argument, readers will have a difficult time deciding if he has succeeded. This is not a book for beginners in philosophy: it deals with an issue most philosophers consider the central one in philosophy and requires extensive familiarity with the discipline, both current and historical. Recommended for academic collections."-Leon H. Brody, Falls Church, VA Library Journal

Papetărie, jocuri, reviste