Shakespeare and Abraham

"Ken Jackson's Shakespeare and Abraham poses a powerful model for how a biblical hero can be recovered within a number of divergent dramatic contexts—both Shakespearean and medieval—as well as in philosophy and theology. Writing with great clarity about challenging ideas, Jackson has led us a great deal closer to understanding the meanings that the binding of Isaac held for Shakespeare." —Julia Reinhard Lupton, University of California, Irvine

"Ken Jackson’s powerfully argued book challenges us to rethink what religion may have meant to Shakespeare and what it may yet come to mean for us. Neither secular nor orthodox, neither skeptical nor pious, Jackson’s Shakespeare is nevertheless a passionately committed playwright deeply aware of the inescapably religious dimensions of everyday life. Through a series of startling readings, Jackson shows Shakespeare bearing witness to a desire for pure generosity that quickens even as it unsettles the three great monotheisms. Shakespeare and Abraham is high-stakes criticism sure to provoke." —Gary Kuchar, University of Victoria

“Ken Jackson’s timely book makes a forceful case for attending to Shakespeare’s engagement with the Abrahamic roots of monotheism as a way of looking anew at some of the most perplexing moments in the plays. Reevaluating the playwright’s attitude toward religion without getting bogged down in debates over doctrinal commitments, Jackson gives us a Shakespeare deeply invested in religious questions, if not religious controversy. Moving effortlessly among theological, literary, and philosophical works from antiquity to the present, Jackson reveals that Shakespeare’s response to Abraham raises urgent questions about the intersections of religion and culture in early modern England that are no less relevant today.” —James A. Knapp, Edward Surtz, S.J., Professor of English, Loyola University Chicago

"Not long ago, Shakespeare criticism generally cast the Bard as a protomodern secular humanist. Lately, the foundational importance of religion to his art has come to the fore. To this new critical recognition, Jackson adds a study of how the aborted sacrifice of Isaac by his father, Abraham, in Genesis 22 informs six plays—Henry VI, King John, Richard II, Titus Andronicus, The Merchant of Venice, and Timon of Athens—that today’s audiences and presenters alike consider difficult. . . .  Jackson’s exposition . . . is hardly easy reading, but it is rich in freshening insights." —Booklist

"For Ken Jackson, Shakespeare is not the secular, modern writer so many critics construct: he is a deeply religious thinker. . . . Jackson's remarkable conclusion is that Shakespeare, like Kierkegaard and Derrida, points in the direction of a certain Abraham beyond Christianity and outside Western metaphysics." —Times Literary Supplement

“Jackson’s stance is less dogmatic than many of the ‘religious turn’ claims that Shakespeare was a closet Catholic . . . . The book is consistently provocative.” —Choice

“While any number of books analyze Shakespeare’s plays and either his religious leanings or biblical imagery, Ken Jackson has a much tighter focus: the famously difficult Genesis 22 story of Abraham and Isaac and its echoes throughout certain of Shakespeare’s plays.” —Catholic Library World

“Jackson’s approach is not just a philological overview of overt references to Genesis, chapter 22; he makes the so-called Binding of Isaac emblematic of Shakespeare’s philosophical struggles with the relationships between religion, sovereignty, law, and justice. . . Shakespeare and Abraham is an excellent inquiry into a rather niche research question. Jackson’s reading, though novel, is very compelling, and resolves some of Shakespeare’s most perplexing moments in a way that almost seems obvious in hindsight.” —Comitatus

“Ken Jackson’s marvelously provocative book Shakespeare and Abraham pushes back against historiographical masterplots in which modernity is realized via secularization. . . Jackson finds, in this premodern text’s grappling with the story of Abraham, a powerful theorization of faith now made legible once again via modern and postmodern theory. This argument works strongly against periodizing ideas about medieval Christianity: it recovers something urgent in medieval though, something that has been occluded and ignored as a result of ideas about progress, secularization and modernity.” —Recent Studies in Tudor and Stuart Drama

Ken Jackson is professor of English and associate dean of the graduate school at Wayne State University. He is co-editor, with Arthur F. Marotti, of Shakespeare and Religion: Early Modern and Postmodern Perspectives (2011), also published by the University of Notre Dame Press.