Cantitate/Preț
Produs

The Anatomy of Revolution Revisited: A Comparative Analysis of England, France, and Russia

Autor Bailey Stone
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 25 iun 2014
This study aims to update a classic of comparative revolutionary analysis, Crane Brinton's 1938 study The Anatomy of Revolution. It invokes the latest research and theoretical writing in history, political science and political sociology to compare and contrast, in their successive phases, the English Revolution of 1640–60, the French Revolution of 1789–99 and the Russian Revolution of 1917–29. This book intends to do what no other comparative analysis of revolutionary change has yet adequately done. It not only progresses beyond Marxian socioeconomic 'class' analysis and early 'revisionist' stresses on short-term, accidental factors involved in revolutionary causation and process; it also finds ways to reconcile 'state-centered' structuralist accounts of the three major European revolutions with postmodernist explanations of those upheavals that play up the centrality of human agency, revolutionary discourse, mentalities, ideology and political culture.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 45260 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Cambridge University Press – 25 iun 2014 45260 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 86956 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Cambridge University Press – 24 noi 2013 86956 lei  6-8 săpt.

Preț: 45260 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 679

Preț estimativ în valută:
8661 8948$ 7205£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 19 martie-02 aprilie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781107623606
ISBN-10: 110762360X
Pagini: 544
Ilustrații: black & white illustrations
Dimensiuni: 153 x 230 x 30 mm
Greutate: 0.79 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:New York, United States

Cuprins

Introduction: from revolutionary theory to revolutionary historiography: England, France, and Russia; 1. Anciens régimes; 2. Transitions: breakthroughs to revolution; 3. Revolutionary 'honeymoons'?; 4. The 'revolutionizing' of the revolutions; 5. Revolutionary climacterics; 6. Thermidor?; Conclusion: 'revolutions from below' and 'revolutions from above'.

Recenzii

'Despite covering an enormous and highly contentious historiography for these revolutions, and covering hundreds of years of history, this book is deft, clear, and a good read. Bailey Stone is particularly good at working with the international, religious/nationalist, and social forces behind every twist and turn of the detailed events. There is nothing else quite like it for telling the story of these three major revolutions in a comparative framework. This is an outstanding book, a worthy sequel to Crane Brinton.' Jack A. Goldstone, Virginia E. and John T. Hazel, Jr, Professor of Public Policy and Eminent Scholar, George Mason University
'The Anatomy of Revolution Revisited is an ambitious effort to chart and analyze three major revolutions that defined the meaning of 'revolution' in the European political tradition. However, the purpose of the book is not to evince a standard model for the revolutionary process, nor is it to apply a ready-made one to the three upheavals under examination. Rather, as a work of comparative history, the book tells the 'story' of each revolution largely on its own terms. A thoughtful, sophisticated, and illuminating comparative study of three European revolutions that helped form the modern world, this book is a worthy successor to Crane Brinton's classic, Anatomy of Revolution.' Thomas Kaiser, University of Arkansas, Little Rock
'Stone's book is a brilliant tour de force, certain to prove of interest to many readers. Needless to say, it should have a place in every serious university library.' Sabrina P. Ramet, Europe-Asia Studies
'As its title suggests, this book seeks to offer a comparative analysis of the three great revolutions in European history - the English (1640–60), the French (1789–99), and the Russian (1917–29), revisiting themes first explored by Crane Brinton in his Anatomy of Revolution of 1938. … There is much to admire here, and throughout the author makes a powerful case for the importance of comparative history.' Tim Harris, Journal of Modern History

Notă biografică


Descriere

This study aims to update a classic of comparative revolutionary analysis, Crane Brinton's 1938 study The Anatomy of Revolution.