The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking: A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization
Autor Ana Ramalhoen Limba Engleză Paperback – 25 apr 2018
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 625.84 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Springer International Publishing – 25 apr 2018 | 625.84 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 631.92 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Springer International Publishing – 15 mar 2016 | 631.92 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 625.84 lei
Preț vechi: 736.28 lei
-15% Nou
Puncte Express: 939
Preț estimativ în valută:
119.81€ • 124.54$ • 99.34£
119.81€ • 124.54$ • 99.34£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 06-20 februarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9783319802978
ISBN-10: 3319802976
Ilustrații: XI, 249 p. 3 illus.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.37 kg
Ediția:Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2016
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Springer
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland
ISBN-10: 3319802976
Ilustrații: XI, 249 p. 3 illus.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.37 kg
Ediția:Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2016
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Springer
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland
Cuprins
1. Introduction.- 2. A Normative Gap inCopyright Lawmaking?.- 3. Colonizing the Normative Gap: The Intervention of theCourt of Justice.- 4. Minding the Normative Gap: The EU Treaties.- 5. Bridgingthe Normative Gap: Proposed Benchmarks for Copyright Lawmaking.- 6. Field-Testingthe Normative Bridge: The EU Copyright Acquis.- 7. The Normative Gap: Water Underthe Bridge.
Textul de pe ultima copertă
This book inquires into the competence of the EU to legislate in the field of copyright, and uses content analysis techniques to demonstrate the existence of a normative gap in copyright lawmaking. To address that gap, it proposes the creation of benchmarks of legislative activity, reasoning that EU secondary legislation, such as directives and regulations, should be based on higher sources of law. It investigates two such possible sources: the activity of the EU Court of Justice in the pre-legislative era and the EU treaties. From these sources, the author establishes concrete benchmarks of legislative activity, which she then tests by applying them to current EU copyright legislation. This provides examples of good and bad practices in copyright lawmaking and also shows how the benchmarks could be implemented in copyright legislation. Finally, the author offers some recommendations in this regard.
Caracteristici
Uses content analysis techniques to provide readers with objective data on copyright lawmaking Establishes benchmarks to propose a new approach to lawmaking that can also be used as a template in other fields Discusses the intersection between EU law and copyright law, encompassing an analysis of both fields, to provide readers with a holistic understanding of copyright lawmaking Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras