Cantitate/Preț
Produs

The Constitutional Structure of Europe’s Area of ‘Freedom, Security and Justice’ and the Right to Justification: Hart Studies in Security and Justice

Autor Ester Herlin-Karnell
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 18 noi 2020
This book explores the implications of freedom as a non-domination-oriented view for understanding EU security regulation and its constitutional implications. At a time when the European borders are under pressure and with the refugee and migration crisis, which escalated in 2015, the idea of exploring a constitutional theory for the 'Area of Freedom, Security and Justice' (AFSJ) might seem to be a utopian project. This appears especially true in the light of the increased threat of terrorism in Europe (and on a global scale) and where the expanding EU security agenda is often advanced through the administrative law path, in contrast to the constitutional trajectory. Add to this the prolonged financial crisis, which continues to cast a long shadow on the future development of EU integration, and which suggests that Europe needs to 're-invent itself' beyond the sphere of economics. Therefore, it is precisely because of the current uncertainties regarding the progress of the EU and the constitutional law project that a constitutional take on the AFSJ is of particular importance. The book investigates the meaning of non-domination and the idea of justice and justification in the area of EU security regulation. In doing so, it focuses on the development of an AFSJ, what it means, and why it represents a fascinating example of contemporary constitutional law with interacting layers of security regulation, human rights law and transnational legal theory at its core.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 26868 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 18 noi 2020 26868 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 53710 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 17 apr 2019 53710 lei  3-5 săpt.

Din seria Hart Studies in Security and Justice

Preț: 26868 lei

Preț vechi: 34732 lei
-23% Nou

Puncte Express: 403

Preț estimativ în valută:
5142 5341$ 4271£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 03-17 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781509945733
ISBN-10: 1509945733
Pagini: 200
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.29 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Seria Hart Studies in Security and Justice

Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

Original research on the constitutional structure of Europe's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, an increasingly topical and important area of constitutional and EU law.

Notă biografică

Ester Herlin-Karnell is Professor in EU Law, University Research Chair of EU Constitutional Law and Justice, and the Director of the VU Centre for European Legal Studies at the Free University of Amsterdam.

Cuprins

PART I1. Introduction I. The Idea of the Book II. The Structure of the Book III. Why Constitutionalism Matters for Constructing the AFSJ Sphere IV. Introduction to the Contested Concept of Justice and the EU Security Status Quo V. Justice, EU Legal Debate and the External Aspect VI. Conclusion 2. The Concept of Non-domination in the EU Security-related Context I. Introduction II. The Concept of 'Freedom as Non-domination' as a Constitutional Set-up: Charting the Main Debate III. Non-domination, Justice and EU Security Regulation IV. Legitimacy and Justification V. Judicial Review and Non-domination VI. Translating the 'Non-domination' Question to the Supranational EU Level and its Relevance for EU Security Regulation VII. Introduction to the Links between Justification and Proportionality in the Context of Non-domination VIII. Conclusion PART II3. The Right to Justification, Justice and the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice I. Introduction II. Justice as a Contested Concept III. Justice and on the Constitutional Structure IV. The Idea of Justification, Democracy and the Question of Legitimacy V. The Ideal and Non-ideal Picture of Justice VI. Constitutional Essentials, Public Reason and Judicial Review II. Same for States and Citizens? The EU Context VIII. Conclusion 4. Proportionality and Reasonable Disagreement in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice I. Introduction II. Proportionality in the AFSJ and Beyond III. Proportionality Discourse: Introductory Remarks to a Grand Debate IV. An Umbrella Principle of Proportionality in EU Law V. Proportionality on the EU Legislative Table VI. The New Contours of Proportionality within the AFSJ: Case Law VII. Critique and Appraisal of the Principle VIII. The Turn to Justification: Proportionality as Reasonable Disagreement IX. Proportionality and Justice as a Force for Good AFSJ Structure? X. Conclusion: Non-domination Utilised Through Proportionality? PART III5. The Right to Justification, Territoriality and Migration, Refugees and Terrorism I. Introduction II. The Decent Society and its Borders: Some Key Debates Explored III. Migration Ethics and the AFSJ Challenge IV. Anti-terrorism, Security and Prevention V. Adjudication and Security in Real Time VI. Agencies and the Accountability Deficit VII. What Kind of Justification for What Kind of Solidarity? VIII. Conclusion 6. The Dimensions of Constitutional Justice: The Multi-Speed Scenario I. Introduction II. Justice and Fragmentation: Cherry-picking AFSJ Standards III. Constitutional Justice, Trust and the CJEU IV. The Court of Justice as a Trustee Court in the AFSJ? V. National Courts and Fiduciary Obligations: When the EU Standard is not Robust Enough VI. Conclusion 7. Conclusion I. Conclusion II. The Justification of the Book

Recenzii

The analysis presented in the book provides more classic discussion points around the AFSJ with robust philosophical foundations. The conceptual richness of the volume sparks a number of follow-up questions that will be hopefully investigated in the future. This piece of scholarship fills a gap in the existing literature by offering a more systemic understanding of the functioning of the AFSJ, and offers an original angle to assess long-standing questions of constitutional relevance.
Herlin-Karnell brings a different perspective to the table and points to the big picture, with well-articulated and compelling arguments that seek to advance the debate in the field of EU criminal law.
It is interesting how Herlin-Karnell connects the topics of non-domination theory, the right to justification and the proportionality principle. This is an added value indeed . the very many questions discussed, the thorough analysis of scholarship and case-law offer a very decent basis for further investigations in European criminal law.