The Language of Brexit: How Britain Talked Its Way Out of the European Union
Autor Dr Steve Buckledeeen Limba Engleză Paperback – 7 feb 2018
| Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
|---|---|---|
| Paperback (1) | 154.11 lei 3-5 săpt. | |
| Bloomsbury Publishing – 7 feb 2018 | 154.11 lei 3-5 săpt. | |
| Hardback (1) | 467.92 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Bloomsbury Publishing – 7 feb 2018 | 467.92 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 154.11 lei
Preț vechi: 166.82 lei
-8% Nou
Puncte Express: 231
Preț estimativ în valută:
29.50€ • 30.34$ • 24.48£
29.50€ • 30.34$ • 24.48£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 29 ianuarie-12 februarie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781350047969
ISBN-10: 1350047961
Pagini: 240
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 19 mm
Greutate: 0.39 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1350047961
Pagini: 240
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 19 mm
Greutate: 0.39 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Caracteristici
Looks at the how, not the why: concentrates solely on the question of language and the highly effective linguistic strategies employed by the Brexit campaigners compared with the dispassionate and at times spiritless language used by pro-Remain supporters
Notă biografică
Steve Buckledee is a Researcher/Lecturer in English language and linguistics at the University of Cagliari, Italy.
Cuprins
Introduction1. "The EU isn't much cop but.": Remain supporters' use of coordinative constructions2. Hedging and modality versus strident claims and apparent absence of doubt 3. More to imperatives than meets the eye4. Inclusive we, the former City broker as champion of the common man, and good old Bojo: how the pro-Brexit press created the illusion of a classless alliance 5. Democracy myths and facts: a double defeat for David Cameron 6. "Free": a little word that did a big job for Brexit 7. Nominalization, presupposition and naturalization 8. The language of racism lite, and not so lite 9. Comparison with the Scottish independence referendum of 2014: how Project Fear worked in 2014 but not in 2016 10. Leave's appointment with history and Remain's another day at the office 11. Little Englanders or reaching out to the world beyond Europe? Comparison with the 1975 referendum on remaining a member of the European Economic Community 12. From "Up Yours Delors" (1990) to "Stick it up your Juncker" (2016). Was it The Sun what done it once again? 13. Dirty Tricks: lies, personal attacks and 'the Queen supports UKIP' 14. The Day After: How could this happen? 15. The issue that would not go away: the General Election of 2017Epilogue Bibliography
Recenzii
Insightful ... [and] fittingly succinct ... [It] explains how the emotive language used by Brexiteers in 2016 overpowered the Remainers' rhetorical hedging.
Enlightening.
Highly engaging ... [The book] has succeeded in giving an all in all concise overview of the linguistic and discourse strategies that were employed by both sides in the referendum to persuade voters ... Contributes greatly to our understanding of the role that language played in one of the most heated and longest public debates in the UK in the past few decades ... Its insights could help readers to interpret the ongoing verbal battles with greater con?dence and a better informed critical eye.
All chapters are extremely well written, never tedious, often outright amusing, and there is something for everyone ... This book appears to be written for a wide audience and has indeed the merit of being highly accessible, without needing any sort of background in linguistics ... The Language of Brexit should be mandatory reading beyond academia, for press officers, speech writers and politicians, especially those involved in the disastrous pro-Remain campaign.
This is forensic linguistic analysis set within a detailed account of the referendum campaigns. It is discourse analysis at its best, with the political context clearly interwoven with the linguistic choices. While rigorous, the book is also extremely accessible. It would be an excellent and accessible text for undergraduates. It is a book to alert the general public to the way 'truth' is constructed in discourse. It is a timely book and, in an era of growing populism, it prompts readers to deconstruct and challenge what they are told by their politicians and journalists.
A timely contribution to the understanding of the discursive mechanism that contributes to the victory for the pro-Brexit camp ... Affords useful insights into the discursive mechanism of an ongoing and significant social event.
Just how influential is mediated language in crucial and complex democratic popular decisions? That is the question at the heart of a fascinating new book ... This is the sort of book we might reasonably expect to have been written by a scholar of media, journalism or politics, but Buckledee demonstrates a sure hand on covering both the politics and the journalism involved in this still controversial issue. Indeed . it is remarkably readable for non-expert linguistics and the general reader.
This excellent volume represents a timely and insightful contribution to the ongoing analysis of a referendum that divided a nation, continues to cast a shadow over political debate in Britain and is likely to have repercussions for years to come both at a national and at an international level. Technical terminology is clearly defined and exemplified, so the detailed, accurate and penetrating linguistic investigations offered are perfectly accessible to readers with little or no background in discourse analysis, while the texts quoted amply and cogently demonstrate the contrasting approaches to language use adopted by Leave and Remain supporters during the sometimes rancorous referendum campaign, thereby uncovering the crucial though implicit socio-political implications such divergent uses give rise to.
This book is an impressive scholarly achievement that makes a major contribution to a better understanding of both Brexit, its causes and consequences and the persuasive power of language in determining the outcome of the Referendum. Steve Buckledee relates language use to the wider socio-political and historical context of Britain in the post-war period, leading up to the Referendum of 2016. His analysis of the language of Brexit and the use of his own language reveal a linguist's ear for the subtleties of expression, and a profound understanding of British political discourse and the British mindset. The book promotes comprehension of the complexity of British politics and the deep divisions of the Remain and Leave campaigns. It is of great interest and benefit for researchers, analysts, teachers and students alike.
Using a clear set of analytical tools, Buckledee compares the rhetorical language of the Leave and Remain camps during the 'Brexit' referendum debate. He then discusses the historical and social-political factors that led to the corrosion of a Pro-Europeanism that had been a centrist force in British politics. The overall analysis shows how the Brexiteers tapped into popular belief and emotional groundswell concerning national pride, anxiety over immigration and loss of secure employment, dislike of the EU and much more. This rhetoric proved to be far more persuasive than the Remainers' lacklustre economic forecasts. A lucid, compelling and timely book.
A timely, well-documented analysis of the role that language has played in one of the key political developments of our uncertain times.
Brexiteers and Remain supporters alike should read The Language of Brexit. While politicians and historians are at pains to articulate the reasons behind this once-in-a-lifetime event, Steve Buckledee, an academic, linguist and novelist, took it upon himself to analyse the relevant public discourse and the linguistic tools that paved the way for Brexit. This book offers an intellectually honest, highly engaging and readable insight into the mass-media supported manipulation of what we once considered to be a monolithic 'reality'.
Buckledee's book is recommended because it serves as a convincing reminder that, as in all matters of human affairs, words do matter.
Enlightening.
Highly engaging ... [The book] has succeeded in giving an all in all concise overview of the linguistic and discourse strategies that were employed by both sides in the referendum to persuade voters ... Contributes greatly to our understanding of the role that language played in one of the most heated and longest public debates in the UK in the past few decades ... Its insights could help readers to interpret the ongoing verbal battles with greater con?dence and a better informed critical eye.
All chapters are extremely well written, never tedious, often outright amusing, and there is something for everyone ... This book appears to be written for a wide audience and has indeed the merit of being highly accessible, without needing any sort of background in linguistics ... The Language of Brexit should be mandatory reading beyond academia, for press officers, speech writers and politicians, especially those involved in the disastrous pro-Remain campaign.
This is forensic linguistic analysis set within a detailed account of the referendum campaigns. It is discourse analysis at its best, with the political context clearly interwoven with the linguistic choices. While rigorous, the book is also extremely accessible. It would be an excellent and accessible text for undergraduates. It is a book to alert the general public to the way 'truth' is constructed in discourse. It is a timely book and, in an era of growing populism, it prompts readers to deconstruct and challenge what they are told by their politicians and journalists.
A timely contribution to the understanding of the discursive mechanism that contributes to the victory for the pro-Brexit camp ... Affords useful insights into the discursive mechanism of an ongoing and significant social event.
Just how influential is mediated language in crucial and complex democratic popular decisions? That is the question at the heart of a fascinating new book ... This is the sort of book we might reasonably expect to have been written by a scholar of media, journalism or politics, but Buckledee demonstrates a sure hand on covering both the politics and the journalism involved in this still controversial issue. Indeed . it is remarkably readable for non-expert linguistics and the general reader.
This excellent volume represents a timely and insightful contribution to the ongoing analysis of a referendum that divided a nation, continues to cast a shadow over political debate in Britain and is likely to have repercussions for years to come both at a national and at an international level. Technical terminology is clearly defined and exemplified, so the detailed, accurate and penetrating linguistic investigations offered are perfectly accessible to readers with little or no background in discourse analysis, while the texts quoted amply and cogently demonstrate the contrasting approaches to language use adopted by Leave and Remain supporters during the sometimes rancorous referendum campaign, thereby uncovering the crucial though implicit socio-political implications such divergent uses give rise to.
This book is an impressive scholarly achievement that makes a major contribution to a better understanding of both Brexit, its causes and consequences and the persuasive power of language in determining the outcome of the Referendum. Steve Buckledee relates language use to the wider socio-political and historical context of Britain in the post-war period, leading up to the Referendum of 2016. His analysis of the language of Brexit and the use of his own language reveal a linguist's ear for the subtleties of expression, and a profound understanding of British political discourse and the British mindset. The book promotes comprehension of the complexity of British politics and the deep divisions of the Remain and Leave campaigns. It is of great interest and benefit for researchers, analysts, teachers and students alike.
Using a clear set of analytical tools, Buckledee compares the rhetorical language of the Leave and Remain camps during the 'Brexit' referendum debate. He then discusses the historical and social-political factors that led to the corrosion of a Pro-Europeanism that had been a centrist force in British politics. The overall analysis shows how the Brexiteers tapped into popular belief and emotional groundswell concerning national pride, anxiety over immigration and loss of secure employment, dislike of the EU and much more. This rhetoric proved to be far more persuasive than the Remainers' lacklustre economic forecasts. A lucid, compelling and timely book.
A timely, well-documented analysis of the role that language has played in one of the key political developments of our uncertain times.
Brexiteers and Remain supporters alike should read The Language of Brexit. While politicians and historians are at pains to articulate the reasons behind this once-in-a-lifetime event, Steve Buckledee, an academic, linguist and novelist, took it upon himself to analyse the relevant public discourse and the linguistic tools that paved the way for Brexit. This book offers an intellectually honest, highly engaging and readable insight into the mass-media supported manipulation of what we once considered to be a monolithic 'reality'.
Buckledee's book is recommended because it serves as a convincing reminder that, as in all matters of human affairs, words do matter.