The Rule of Reverse Results: The Effects of Unethical Policies?
Autor Audrey Wellsen Limba Engleză Hardback – 26 mai 2016
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 135.69 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Taylor & Francis – 30 iun 2021 | 135.69 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 323.90 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Taylor & Francis – 26 mai 2016 | 323.90 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 323.90 lei
Preț vechi: 422.77 lei
-23% Nou
Puncte Express: 486
Preț estimativ în valută:
61.99€ • 65.80$ • 51.65£
61.99€ • 65.80$ • 51.65£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 26 decembrie 24 - 09 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781472485465
ISBN-10: 1472485467
Pagini: 146
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.29 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1472485467
Pagini: 146
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.29 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Cuprins
1 ISRAEL 2WESTERN INTERVENTION IN MUSLIM STATES 3 CHINA AND RUSSIA 4 THE SECOND WORLD WAR 5 GENOCIDE 6 MASSACRES WITHOUT REVERSE RESULTS 7 FURTHER UNETHICAL POLICIES THAT HAVE NOT PRODUCED REVERSE RESULTS 8 PEACEMAKERS WITH POSITIVE RESULTS
Notă biografică
Audrey Wells, Royal Holloway College, University of London, UK
Recenzii
"This is a fascinating, thought-provoking book which will lead the reader to ponder the role of ethics in policies. As the author maintains, ethical policies are needed more than ever in the world today." - Martin McCauley in the New Year edition of East -West Review
Descriere
Do extreme, unethical governmental policies often produce results opposite to those intended? This book considers the ironic outcomes of recent global events and concludes that there is a 'rule of reverse results' at work. While not a hard and fast law, the rule points out the increased probability that a policy will backfire if it is immoral while ethical policies, even if extreme, are unlikely to produce reverse results. The issue here is that of increased likelihood but not of certainty.