The Two Faces of Judicial Power: Dynamics of Judicial-Political Bargaining
Autor Benjamin G. Engsten Limba Engleză Paperback – 18 apr 2022
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 564.84 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Springer International Publishing – 18 apr 2022 | 564.84 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 568.97 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Springer International Publishing – 18 apr 2021 | 568.97 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 564.84 lei
Preț vechi: 664.51 lei
-15% Nou
Puncte Express: 847
Preț estimativ în valută:
108.10€ • 114.04$ • 90.09£
108.10€ • 114.04$ • 90.09£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 03-17 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9783030460181
ISBN-10: 3030460185
Pagini: 245
Ilustrații: XVI, 245 p. 30 illus.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 mm
Greutate: 0.35 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2021
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Palgrave Macmillan
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland
ISBN-10: 3030460185
Pagini: 245
Ilustrații: XVI, 245 p. 30 illus.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 mm
Greutate: 0.35 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2021
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Palgrave Macmillan
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland
Cuprins
1. The Two Faces of Judicial Power.- 2. The Judicial-Policy-Dialog Game.- 3. Judicial Power in Germany and the European Union.- 4. The First Face of Judicial Power.- 5. The Second Face of Judicial Power.- 6. Conclusion: The Implications of Judicial Power.
Notă biografică
Benjamin G. Engst is a Postdoctoral Researcher in Political Science at the University of Mannheim, Germany. He specializes in Comparative Political Institutions and Behavior and has a strong background in quantitative methods with a focus on Judicial Politics.
Textul de pe ultima copertă
This book shows that constitutional courts exercise direct and indirect power on political branches through decision-making. The first face of judicial power is characterized by courts directing political actors to implement judicial decisions in specific ways. The second face leads political actors to anticipate judicial review and draft policies accordingly. The judicial–political interaction originating from both faces is herein formally modeled. A cross-European comparison of pre-conditions of judicial power shows that the German Federal Constitutional Court is a well-suited representative case for a quantitative assessment of judicial power. Multinomial logistic regressions show that the court uses directives when evasion of decisions is costly while accounting for the government’s ability to implement decisions. Causal analyses of the second face of judicial power show that bills exposed to legal signals are drafted accounting for the court. These findings re-shape our understanding of judicialization and shed light on a silent form of judicialization.
Benjamin G. Engst is a Postdoctoral Researcher in Political Science at the University of Mannheim, Germany.
Caracteristici
Shows that constitutional courts exercise direct and indirect power on political branches through decision-making Presents that the first face of judicial power is characterized by courts directing political actors to implement judicial decisions in specific ways Models judicial–political interaction originating from both faces