Transcendence and Non-Naturalism in Early Chinese Thought
Autor Dr Alexus McLeod, Dr Joshua R. Brownen Limba Engleză Paperback – 23 mar 2022
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 197.49 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Bloomsbury Publishing – 23 mar 2022 | 197.49 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 596.74 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Bloomsbury Publishing – 2 sep 2020 | 596.74 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 197.49 lei
Preț vechi: 258.06 lei
-23% Nou
Puncte Express: 296
Preț estimativ în valută:
37.80€ • 39.68$ • 31.23£
37.80€ • 39.68$ • 31.23£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 30 ianuarie-13 februarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781350204034
ISBN-10: 135020403X
Pagini: 256
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.36 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 135020403X
Pagini: 256
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.36 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Caracteristici
Co-written by a philosopher and a theologian, allowing the authors to stage a comparative and interdisciplinary conversation.
Notă biografică
Alexus McLeod is Associate Professor in Philosophy and Asian/Asian American Studies at the University of Connecticut, USA. He has published numerous books and articles in Chinese and Comparative Philosophy. Theories of Chinese Philosophy (Rowman and Littlefield International) has appeared in print, and Philosophy of the Ancient Maya: Lords of Time is forthcoming (Lexington Books). Joshua R. Brown is Assistant Professor in Theology at Mount St. Mary's University, USA. He has published several articles in the fields of comparative and systematic theologies, focusing on Confucian Philosophy in the Pre-Qin through Han periods. He has articles forthcoming in Theological Studies, The Heythrop Journal, Pro Ecclesia, and Nova et Vetera.
Cuprins
Introduction: Arguments for a Non-Naturalist Reading of Early Chinese Thought Part I: Groundwork-Questioning a Naturalistic Interpretation of Early Chinese Thoughts 1. "Naturalism" in Western Philosophy and its Use in Scholarship on Chinese Thought2. Rethinking Transcendence and Nature3. The Naturalist Project of the HanPart II: Transcendence-Readings of Key Concepts and Texts4. Does Tian Will? The Debate in Warring States and Han5. The Relationship Between Tian and Humanity6. Tian and the Grounding of Ritual7. Dao and the Propensities of Tian 8. Dao and Cosmogony9. Dao as Action and Natural LawPart III: Substance-Readings of Key Concepts and Texts10. Qi as Substance in the Early Han12. Chapter Twelve: Qi as Essential Spirit13. An Essential Reading of Xing14. An Essential Reading of XinBibliographyIndex
Recenzii
[T]he greatest value of Brown and McLeod's study consists in that they have made an extremely convincing case for comparative theologians, philosophers and interreligious scholars on Chinese thought to abandon the binary "the same or not" mindset identified at the beginning of this review. With a further respect towards the historical and traditional nature of classical Chinese thought, I believe their work can lead to even more fruitful conversations on how to harmonize classical Chinese thought and Western thought without making them uniform.
Whether it is a discussion of the non-naturalism of dao or tian, Brown and McLeod demonstrate the intellectual value of comparative philosophy as one formidable approach to early Chinese philosophical writings.
[What] Brown and McLeod try to accomplish in this book is to prove there are a number of texts of early Chinese thought . which can be interpreted fruitfully by means of a conversation with Western thinkers rich on transcendence and non-naturalism . I celebrate that, because of their sophisticated analyses of so many early Chinese texts, Brown and McLeod have accomplished their goal.
Challenging the popular scholastic view that early Chinese thinkers lacked non-naturalistic concepts, Brown and McLeod robustly demonstrate the importance and varied ways of non-naturalist and transcendental concepts in early China, presenting an invaluable contribution to the field of Chinese philosophy and comparative philosophy.
Whether it is a discussion of the non-naturalism of dao or tian, Brown and McLeod demonstrate the intellectual value of comparative philosophy as one formidable approach to early Chinese philosophical writings.
[What] Brown and McLeod try to accomplish in this book is to prove there are a number of texts of early Chinese thought . which can be interpreted fruitfully by means of a conversation with Western thinkers rich on transcendence and non-naturalism . I celebrate that, because of their sophisticated analyses of so many early Chinese texts, Brown and McLeod have accomplished their goal.
Challenging the popular scholastic view that early Chinese thinkers lacked non-naturalistic concepts, Brown and McLeod robustly demonstrate the importance and varied ways of non-naturalist and transcendental concepts in early China, presenting an invaluable contribution to the field of Chinese philosophy and comparative philosophy.