Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Verbal Deficit: A Critique: Routledge Library Editions: Sociolinguistics

Autor J. C. B. Gordon
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 25 feb 2020
Originally published in 1981. Verbal deficit theories try to account for differential educational attainments in linguistic terms, suggesting that children reach varying levels of success in school as a result of their ability or inability to express themselves, and relate this to social class. This critique considers such theories, especially in the form propounded by Bernstein, primarily from a sociolinguistic viewpoint but with special attention to the historical and educational context behind the theories. It claims that verbal deficit theories are not only unscientific and non-linguistic, but are educationally damaging as well, and proposes instead a linguistic ‘difference’ theory.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 21838 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 25 feb 2020 21838 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 50055 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 3 oct 2018 50055 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Routledge Library Editions: Sociolinguistics

Preț: 21838 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 328

Preț estimativ în valută:
4179 4312$ 3537£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 04-18 martie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781138352872
ISBN-10: 113835287X
Pagini: 180
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Library Editions: Sociolinguistics

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Public țintă

Postgraduate and Undergraduate

Cuprins

Introduction  1. Differential Educational Attainment  2. ‘Classical’ Verbal Deficit Theory  3. Bernstein’s Sociolinguistic Theory  4. Challenges and Alternatives  5. Verbal Deficit Theories in Context.  Conclusion and Prospect.  Appendices

Descriere

Originally published in 1981. This critique considers verbal deficit theories, especially Bernstein's, from a sociolinguistic viewpoint but with attention to the historical and educational context. It concludes that verbal deficit theories are educationally damaging, and proposes instead a linguistic ‘difference’ theory.