Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
What's Wrong with Sin: Sin in Individual and Social Perspective from Schleiermacher to Theologies of Liberation de Dr Derek R. Nelson

What's Wrong with Sin: Sin in Individual and Social Perspective from Schleiermacher to Theologies of Liberation

Autor Dr Derek R. Nelson
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 29 iul 2009
Examines two primary doctrines of sin the 'structural sin' type and the 'relational self' type. This title includes chapters that track the development of Latin American liberation theologies of sin, analyse feminist and womanist writings on sin, and offer an analysis of selected developments in doctrines of sin from Asian Christian theologians.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 29685 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 29 iul 2009 29685 lei  3-5 săpt.
Hardback (1) 94570 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 29 iul 2009 94570 lei  6-8 săpt.

Preț: 29685 lei

Preț vechi: 32582 lei
-9% Nou

Puncte Express: 445
Preț estimativ în valută:
5682€ • 5958$ • 4695£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 08-22 ianuarie 25

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780567266767
ISBN-10: 0567266761
Pagini: 232
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.34 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția T&T Clark
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

Puts the movement of Liberation Theology in a wider context for the student market.

Cuprins

Chapter I: Introduction

Part I: Nineteenth Century Typology
Chapter II: Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher on Individual Sin
Chapter III: Finney and Nevin on Individual and Social Sin

Part II: Twentieth Century Application
Chapter IV: Individual and Social Sin in Selected Latin American Theologies
Chapter V: Individual and Social Sin in Selected Feminist Theologies
Chapter VI: Individual and Social Sin in Selected Asian Theologies

Chapter VII: Conclusion

Recenzii

'For the theological student or pastor, Derek Nelson's study on the changing understanding of sin should become a vital reference. Nelson traces the critique of individualistic views of sin for more social views and the relational self in 19th century theology. He then shows the flowering of these new understandings in Latin American Liberation theologies, Feminist and Womanist theologies and Korean Minjung Theology in the last third of the twentieth century.' - Rosemary Radford Ruether, Claremont Graduate University, USA
'Derek Nelson offers persuasive proposals about how better to formulate a social doctrine of sin. It is based on the most wide-ranging analytical map available of such doctrines of sin, a map that exhibits their differing senses of "sin" and "social" and the various strategies they use to avoid the individualism characteristic of older theologies. Placing them in a larger historical perspective, Nelson shows that although social doctrines of sin are widespread in the past half-century, especially in liberationist theologies, have instructive precedents in nineteenth century theology.' - David H. Kelsey, Yale Divinity School, New Haven, CT, USA
'Hyper-individualism is everyone's favorite whipping-boy these days, but solutions to the problem too often end up flat or trite. Derek Nelson's survey of responses to individualism in the doctrine of sin in the last two centuries nicely sets the table for a constructive theology of social sin. A generous yet incisive reader, Nelson listens to and learns from wildly disparate voices (Schleiermacher and Finney and Gutierrez - oh my!). His critical patience and concern to engage in constructive Christian theology ensure that the strong medicine of contextual theology is not hopelessly diluted by mere description, the vacuous praise of the guilty holders of power, or the flattening of inter-religious generalizations. His proposal to integrate a structural account of sin and a relational anthropology, coupled with a call for analytic rigor in our understandings of both, brings clarity to a cloudy discussion. One only hopes that he will write the constructive theology of social sin for which he calls!' - Matt Jenson, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA