Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Conservatism and the Quarterly Review: A Critical Analysis: The History of the Book

Editat de Jonathan Cutmore
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 21 ian 2016
In its time, the Quarterly Review was thought to closely reflect government policy, however, the essays in this volume reveal that it was inconsistent in its support of government positions and reflected disagreement over a broad range of religious, economic and political issues.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 44941 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 21 ian 2016 44941 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 105930 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – oct 2007 105930 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria The History of the Book

Preț: 44941 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 674

Preț estimativ în valută:
8599 8979$ 7101£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 15-29 aprilie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781138663664
ISBN-10: 1138663662
Pagini: 290
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria The History of the Book

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Cuprins

Introduction, Jonathan Cutmore; Chapter 1 Plotting the Success of the Quarterly Review, Kim Wheatley; Chapter 2 'Sardonic Grins' and 'Paranoid Politics': Religion, Economics, and Public Policy in the Quarterly Review, Boyd Hilton; Chapter 3 A Plurality of Voices in the Quarterly Review, Jonathan Cutmore; Chapter 4 Politics, Culture and Scholarship: Classics in the Quarterly Review, Christopher Stray; Chapter 5 Walter Scott and the Quarterly Review, Sharon Ragaz; Chapter 6 John Barrow, the Quarterly 's Imperial Reviewer, J. M. R. Cameron; Chapter 7 Hung, Drawn and Quarterlyed: Robert Southey, Poetry, Poets and the Quarterly Review, Lynda Pratt; Chapter 8 Robert Southey's Contribution to the Quarterly Review, W. A. Speck;

Descriere

In its time, the Quarterly Review was thought to closely reflect government policy, however, the essays in this volume reveal that it was inconsistent in its support of government positions and reflected disagreement over a broad range of religious, economic and political issues.