Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors: The Pocket Books of The Hague Academy of International Law / Les livres de poche de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye, cartea 50
Autor Dire Tladien Limba Engleză Paperback – 26 iul 2022
Preț: 115.49 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 173
Preț estimativ în valută:
22.12€ • 22.79$ • 18.53£
22.12€ • 22.79$ • 18.53£
Carte indisponibilă temporar
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789004521476
ISBN-10: 900452147X
Greutate: 1.57 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria The Pocket Books of The Hague Academy of International Law / Les livres de poche de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye
ISBN-10: 900452147X
Greutate: 1.57 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria The Pocket Books of The Hague Academy of International Law / Les livres de poche de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye
Notă biografică
Dire Tladi is Professor of International Law and holder of the NRF SARChI Chair in International Constitutional Law at the University of Pretoria. He is a member of the UN International Law Commission and its Special Rapporteur on Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens). He is also a member of the Institut de Droit International.
Cuprins
Prologue ........................ 13
Chapter I. The issues................. 14
A. Introduction................... 14
B. Policy considerations.............. 18
C. Outline ..................... 22
Chapter II. The prohibition on the extraterritorial use of force: the nuts and bolts and the methodology of international law.............. 24
A. Introduction................... 24
B. The methodological issues ........... 25
1. General.................... 25
2. The methodology for the identification of rules ..................... 27
(a) The methodology of treaty and custo mary international law ......... 27
(b) Peremptory status of the prohibition on the use of force ............. 35
C. The context of the prohibition on the use of force ....................... 46
1. Point of departure .............. 46
2. Collective security.............. 51
D. A survey of exceptions............. 58
Chapter III. Self-defence against non-state actors: the expansive approach .............. 62
A. Introduction................... 62
B. The extraterritorial use of force in self defence: A brief description .......... 64
C. The emergence of the permissive approach to self-defence against non-State actors .... 67
1. General.................... 67
2. The sources of support for the emergent permissive trend ............... 69
(a) The Chatham House Principles .... 72
(b) The Leiden Recommendations ..... 73
(c) The Bethlehem Principles ....... 75
(d) Authority for the propositions advanced in the policy instruments.... 77
D. The argument for an expanded approach ... 79
1. Literal reading of Article 51 ........ 79
2. Pre-existing customary international law. . 81
3. Contemporary State practice ........ 83
E. Concluding remarks .............. 94
Chapter IV. Evaluating the arguments for an expansive view of the extraterritorial use of force against non-state actors ........... 96
A. Introduction................... 96
B. The language of Article 51 .......... 98
1. The “inherent right” to self-defence .... 98
2. The meaning of the phrase “armed attack” 102
(a) “Armed attack” in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice ... 103
(b) Interpretation according to the Vienna Convention ............... 117
C. Other means of interpretation relevant to the meaning of “armed attack”........... 124
1. General practice ............... 125
2. 9/11-related practice............. 130
3. ISIS-related practice............. 136
4. Other rules of international law ...... 142
D. The level of attribution............. 143
Chapter V. Extraterritorial use of force against non state actors upon the invitation of the territorial state ......................... 146
A. Introduction................... 146
B. Intervention by invitation against non-State actors ...................... 148
1. Definitional issues.............. 148
2. Intervention by invitation and the prohibi tion on the use of force ........... 151
3. Limitation on intervention by invitation . . 157
4. Examples from modern practice on the application of these principles ....... 168
C. Conclusion ................... 177
Chapter VI. Concluding words ........... 181
A. Synopsis .................... 181
B. Between the restrictive and expansive approaches ................... 183
1. Self-defence against non-state actors: res trictive approach............... 183
2. Intervention by invitation against non-state actors: expansive approach ......... 185
C. Why the discrepancy? ............. 186
About the Author ................... 187
Biographical note.................. 187
Principal publications ............... 187
Chapter I. The issues................. 14
A. Introduction................... 14
B. Policy considerations.............. 18
C. Outline ..................... 22
Chapter II. The prohibition on the extraterritorial use of force: the nuts and bolts and the methodology of international law.............. 24
A. Introduction................... 24
B. The methodological issues ........... 25
1. General.................... 25
2. The methodology for the identification of rules ..................... 27
(a) The methodology of treaty and custo mary international law ......... 27
(b) Peremptory status of the prohibition on the use of force ............. 35
C. The context of the prohibition on the use of force ....................... 46
1. Point of departure .............. 46
2. Collective security.............. 51
D. A survey of exceptions............. 58
Chapter III. Self-defence against non-state actors: the expansive approach .............. 62
A. Introduction................... 62
B. The extraterritorial use of force in self defence: A brief description .......... 64
C. The emergence of the permissive approach to self-defence against non-State actors .... 67
1. General.................... 67
2. The sources of support for the emergent permissive trend ............... 69
(a) The Chatham House Principles .... 72
(b) The Leiden Recommendations ..... 73
(c) The Bethlehem Principles ....... 75
(d) Authority for the propositions advanced in the policy instruments.... 77
D. The argument for an expanded approach ... 79
1. Literal reading of Article 51 ........ 79
2. Pre-existing customary international law. . 81
3. Contemporary State practice ........ 83
E. Concluding remarks .............. 94
Chapter IV. Evaluating the arguments for an expansive view of the extraterritorial use of force against non-state actors ........... 96
A. Introduction................... 96
B. The language of Article 51 .......... 98
1. The “inherent right” to self-defence .... 98
2. The meaning of the phrase “armed attack” 102
(a) “Armed attack” in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice ... 103
(b) Interpretation according to the Vienna Convention ............... 117
C. Other means of interpretation relevant to the meaning of “armed attack”........... 124
1. General practice ............... 125
2. 9/11-related practice............. 130
3. ISIS-related practice............. 136
4. Other rules of international law ...... 142
D. The level of attribution............. 143
Chapter V. Extraterritorial use of force against non state actors upon the invitation of the territorial state ......................... 146
A. Introduction................... 146
B. Intervention by invitation against non-State actors ...................... 148
1. Definitional issues.............. 148
2. Intervention by invitation and the prohibi tion on the use of force ........... 151
3. Limitation on intervention by invitation . . 157
4. Examples from modern practice on the application of these principles ....... 168
C. Conclusion ................... 177
Chapter VI. Concluding words ........... 181
A. Synopsis .................... 181
B. Between the restrictive and expansive approaches ................... 183
1. Self-defence against non-state actors: res trictive approach............... 183
2. Intervention by invitation against non-state actors: expansive approach ......... 185
C. Why the discrepancy? ............. 186
About the Author ................... 187
Biographical note.................. 187
Principal publications ............... 187