Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Freewill and Determinism: A Study of Rival Conceptions of Man: Routledge Library Editions: Free Will and Determinism

Autor R.L. Franklin
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 11 dec 2018
This book, first published in 1968, examines the complicated issues which surround the problem of freewill. Although it reaches a libertarian conclusion, its focus is largely on other questions. What ultimately is at stake in this debate? What difference would it make whether we had freewill or not? Why must disagreement persist, and why do philosophes each opposed conclusions with such confidence? The answers to these questions open new perspectives.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 23354 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 11 dec 2018 23354 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 67682 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 6 iun 2017 67682 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Routledge Library Editions: Free Will and Determinism

Preț: 23354 lei

Preț vechi: 28126 lei
-17% Nou

Puncte Express: 350

Preț estimativ în valută:
4470 4715$ 3725£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 03-17 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781138703735
ISBN-10: 1138703737
Pagini: 358
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 19 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Library Editions: Free Will and Determinism

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Cuprins

1. The Problem  2. Freedom and Indeterminism  3. The Nature of the Debate  4. The Scope of Libertarianism  5. Freewill and Philosophy of Mind  6. The Re-Emergence of the Problem  7. Predictability  8. Moral Philosophy and Moral Problems  9. desert and Efficacy  10. Excuses  11. Determinism and Phenomenology  12. Theoretical and Practical Explanation  13. Determinism, Science and Morality  14. Conclusion

Descriere

This book, first published in 1968, examines the complicated issues which surround the problem of freewill. Although it reaches a libertarian conclusion, its focus is largely on other questions. What ultimately is at stake in this debate? What difference would it make whether we had freewill or not?