Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Judicial Deference in International Adjudication: A Comparative Analysis: Studies in International Law

Autor Johannes Hendrik Fahner
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 5 aug 2020
International courts and tribunals are increasingly asked to pass judgment on matters that are traditionally considered to fall within the domestic jurisdiction of States. Especially in the fields of human rights, investment, and trade law, international adjudicators commonly evaluate decisions of national authorities that have been made in the course of democratic procedures and public deliberation. A controversial question is whether international adjudicators should review such decisions de novo or show deference to domestic authorities. This book investigates how various international courts and tribunals have responded to this question. In addition to a comparative analysis, the book provides a normative argument, discussing whether different forms of deference are justified in international adjudication. It proposes a distinction between epistemic deference, which is based on the superior capacity of domestic authorities to make factual and technical assessments, and constitutional deference, which is based on the democratic legitimacy of domestic decision-making. The book concludes that epistemic deference is a prudent acknowledgement of the limited expertise of international adjudicators, whereas the case for constitutional deference depends on the relative power of the reviewing court vis-à-vis the domestic legal order.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 35369 lei  6-8 săpt. +10220 lei  4-10 zile
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 23 feb 2022 35369 lei  6-8 săpt. +10220 lei  4-10 zile
Hardback (1) 59906 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 5 aug 2020 59906 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Studies in International Law

Preț: 59906 lei

Preț vechi: 85948 lei
-30% Nou

Puncte Express: 899

Preț estimativ în valută:
11465 11909$ 9523£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 03-17 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781509932283
ISBN-10: 1509932283
Pagini: 312
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 25 mm
Greutate: 0.61 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Seria Studies in International Law

Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

Examines the degree to which international courts defer to national courts

Notă biografică

Johannes Hendrik Fahner is an attorney-at-law practising at the Dutch bar and a researcher at the University of Amsterdam.

Cuprins

1. Introduction I. Deference in International Adjudication II. The Concept of Deference A. Defining Deference B. Deference in the Domestic Context C. Deference in the International Context III. Approach: A Comparative Analysis of Deference 2. Judicial Deference in International Practice I. Introduction II. The International Court of Justice III. The European Court of Human Rights A. Development of the Margin of Appreciation B. Conceptual Analysis of the Margin of Appreciation C. Justifications for the Margin of Appreciation D. Deference to Domestic Courts Beyond the Margin of Appreciation E. Conclusions on the European Court of Human Rights IV. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights V. The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights VI. The World Trade Organization A. Article 11 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding B. Article 17.6 of the Anti-dumping Agreement C. Conclusions on the WTO VII. Investor-State Arbitration Tribunals A. Approaches in Favour of (Some) Deference B. Approaches Critical of Deference C. Conclusions on Investment Arbitration VIII. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea IX. Conclusions 3. A Comparative Analysis of Deference in International Practice I. Introduction II. The Scope of Deference A. Deference in the Context of Specific Assessments i. Assessments of Facts ii. Technical Assessments iii. Interpretation and Application of Domestic Law iv. Public Policy Choices v. Treaty Interpretation B. Deference Towards Specific Domestic Actors i. Domestic Parliaments ii. Domestic Administrative Agencies iii. Domestic Courts C. Deference in the Context of Specific Norms i. Indeterminate Standards ii. Self-Judging Clauses D. Conclusions on the Scope of Deference III. The Depth of DeferenceA. From Treaty Standard to Standard of Review B. The Margin of Appreciation C. Reasonableness D. Good Faith E. Proportionality F. Procedural Review G. Overlapping Standards of Review IV. Conclusions4. A Normative Assessment of Deference in International Adjudication I. Introduction II. Epistemic Deference III. Constitutional Deference A. Introduction B. Arguments in Favour of Constitutional Deference: The Domestic Parallel i. The Domestic Court Analogy ii. The Democratic Argument C. Arguments in Favour of Constitutional Deference: The International Dimension i. State Sovereignty ii. Subsidiarity D. Arguments against Constitutional Deference i. Deference as an Abdication of the Judicial Task ii. Procedural Fairness iii. Universalism and Uniformity E. Taking Stock: A Purposeful Rejection of Constitutional Deference i. The Separation of Powers and the Perks of Sovereignty ii. The Purpose of International Courts and Tribunals iii. The Ambiguities of Deference and the Alternative of Restrictive Interpretation IV. Conclusions5. Final Conclusions